Literature DB >> 22874123

Pareto evolution of gene networks: an algorithm to optimize multiple fitness objectives.

Aryeh Warmflash1, Paul Francois, Eric D Siggia.   

Abstract

The computational evolution of gene networks functions like a forward genetic screen to generate, without preconceptions, all networks that can be assembled from a defined list of parts to implement a given function. Frequently networks are subject to multiple design criteria that cannot all be optimized simultaneously. To explore how these tradeoffs interact with evolution, we implement Pareto optimization in the context of gene network evolution. In response to a temporal pulse of a signal, we evolve networks whose output turns on slowly after the pulse begins, and shuts down rapidly when the pulse terminates. The best performing networks under our conditions do not fall into categories such as feed forward and negative feedback that also encode the input-output relation we used for selection. Pareto evolution can more efficiently search the space of networks than optimization based on a single ad hoc combination of the design criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22874123      PMCID: PMC3609408          DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/9/5/056001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Biol        ISSN: 1478-3967            Impact factor:   2.583


  19 in total

Review 1.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: analyzing the state-of-the-art.

Authors:  D A Van Veldhuizen; G B Lamont
Journal:  Evol Comput       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.277

2.  The coherent feedforward loop serves as a sign-sensitive delay element in transcription networks.

Authors:  S Mangan; A Zaslaver; U Alon
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Design of genetic networks with specified functions by evolution in silico.

Authors:  Paul François; Vincent Hakim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif.

Authors:  S Mangan; U Alon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Surviving heat shock: control strategies for robustness and performance.

Authors:  H El-Samad; H Kurata; J C Doyle; C A Gross; M Khammash
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Environmental selection of the feed-forward loop circuit in gene-regulation networks.

Authors:  Erez Dekel; Shmoolik Mangan; Uri Alon
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Simulating the evolution of signal transduction pathways.

Authors:  Orkun S Soyer; Thomas Pfeiffer; Sebastian Bonhoeffer
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 8.  The evolution of genetic networks by non-adaptive processes.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 9.  Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space.

Authors:  Boris N Kholodenko
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 94.444

10.  Negative autoregulation speeds the response times of transcription networks.

Authors:  Nitzan Rosenfeld; Michael B Elowitz; Uri Alon
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-11-08       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  11 in total

1.  NetExplore: a web server for modeling small network motifs.

Authors:  Dmitri Papatsenko; Ihor R Lemischka
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Mechanistic links between cellular trade-offs, gene expression, and growth.

Authors:  Andrea Y Weiße; Diego A Oyarzún; Vincent Danos; Peter S Swain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Computer-assisted design for scaling up systems based on DNA reaction networks.

Authors:  Nathanaël Aubert; Clément Mosca; Teruo Fujii; Masami Hagiya; Yannick Rondelez
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Trade-offs between microbial growth phases lead to frequency-dependent and non-transitive selection.

Authors:  Michael Manhart; Bharat V Adkar; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Design principles of regulatory networks: searching for the molecular algorithms of the cell.

Authors:  Wendell A Lim; Connie M Lee; Chao Tang
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Evolutionary tradeoffs between economy and effectiveness in biological homeostasis systems.

Authors:  Pablo Szekely; Hila Sheftel; Avi Mayo; Uri Alon
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Using Sub-Network Combinations to Scale Up an Enumeration Method for Determining the Network Structures of Biological Functions.

Authors:  J Y Xi; Q Ouyang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  φ-evo: A program to evolve phenotypic models of biological networks.

Authors:  Adrien Henry; Mathieu Hemery; Paul François
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Feed-forward regulation adaptively evolves via dynamics rather than topology when there is intrinsic noise.

Authors:  Kun Xiong; Alex K Lancaster; Mark L Siegal; Joanna Masel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  The geometry of the Pareto front in biological phenotype space.

Authors:  Hila Sheftel; Oren Shoval; Avi Mayo; Uri Alon
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.