Literature DB >> 22872802

Control of Campylobacter spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica by virulent bacteriophages.

Stefanie Orquera, Greta Gölz, Stefan Hertwig, Jens Hammerl, Doreen Sparborth, Alma Joldic, Thomas Alter.   

Abstract

The efficacy of the Campylobacter (C.) phages NCTC12684 (group II) and CP81 (group III) and of the Yersinia (Y.) phage PY100 to reduce the numbers of Campylobacter and Y. enterocolitica in meat at 4(o)C applying different Multiplicities of Infection (MOIs) was analyzed. Initial experiments were carried out in broth at 4(o)C and 37(o)C to compare cell number reductions under chilling and optimized growth conditions, respectively. The results showed a 1 log(10) unit reduction of Campylobacter cell numbers at 37(o)C in broth. However, no reduction was observed in broth and meat at 4(o)C. In contrast, Y. enterocolitica cell numbers were reduced in broth at 4(o)C (up to 3 log(10) units after 24hr) and 37(o)C (5 log(10) units after 1.5hr) and also in meat at 4(o)C (2 log(10) units after 48hr). The highest cell number reductions were obtained at the highest MOIs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Campylobacter; Yersinia; bacteriophage; biocontrol; food safety

Year:  2012        PMID: 22872802      PMCID: PMC3410378          DOI: 10.4172/1747-0862.1000049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Genet Med        ISSN: 1747-0862


INTRODUCTION

Campylobacter causes approximately 200,000 cases of campylobacterosis in the European Union (EFSA, 2009) and thus is one of the most important bacterial foodborne pathogens. Yersinia infections are of secondary importance with about 7,500 cases yearly (EFSA, 2009). Complete elimination of both pathogens in the food chain is currently not feasible, but the quantitative load can be reduced by several pre- and post-harvest applications. Post-harvest approaches exploiting virulent phages have already been described and focus up to now on the control of Listeria (L.) monocytogenes and Salmonella. Due to the effectiveness and innocuousness of Listeria phages, two products were already approved by the FDA: ListShield, the LMP-102 phage preparation comprising six phages for the control of L. monocytogenes on ready-to-eat foods (Bren, 2007), and Listex P100 (phage P100) for the control of this species in meat and cheese products (Carlton et al, 2005). P100 is able to eliminate or reduce Listeria up to 3.5 log10 cfu/g under appropriate conditions (Carlton et al, 2005; Holck and Berg, 2009; Soni et al, 2009; Soni and Nannapaneni, 2010). With Salmonella, up to 4 log10 unit reductions of cell number have been described in vegetables, chicken, chicken products, sausages and cheese (Modi et al, 2001; Goode et al, 2003; Leverentz et al, 2003; Whichard et al, 2003; Higgins et al, 2005). Some studies demonstrated the efficacy of phages on C. jejuni. Cell numbers were reduced by approximately 1 log10 unit at 4-5°C on chicken skin, and on raw and cooked meat (Atterbury et al, 2003; Goode et al, 2003, Bigwood et al, 2008). No data are currently available on post-harvest application of Y. enterocolitica phages. This work describes the potential of the Campylobacter phages NCTC12684 and CP81 and of the Yersinia phage PY100 to control their hosts in broth and meat.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and bacteriophages

Two Campylobacter strains and one Yersinia strain were used in this study: C. jejuni NCTC 11168 and C. coli NCTC 12668 were obtained from the National Collection of Type Cultures (NCTC), Health Protection Agency, United Kingdom. Y. enterocolitica 83/88/2 is a plasmid-cured derivative of the serogroup O:5,27, biogroup 2 strain 83/88 (Hertwig et al, 2003). Campylobacter strains were grown on Mueller-Hinton-blood (MHB) agar (Oxoid, Wesel, Germany), modified Charcoal-Cefoperazon-Desoxycholat (mCCDA) agar (Oxoid) or in Sodium-NZamines-Casaminoacids-Yeast-Magnesiumsulfate (NZCYM) medium (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) at 37°C under microaerobic conditions. Y. enterocolitica 83/88/2 was grown on Luria Bertani (LB) agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), Yersinia selective (CIN) agar (Oxoid) or in NZCYM medium at 37oC under aerobic conditions. C. jejuni phage CP81 isolated from retail chicken meat has recently been characterized (Hammerl et al, 2011). The NCTC group II phage 12684 that infects C. jejuni and C. coli strains has also previously been described (Sails et al, 1998). PY100 is a broad host range Yersinia phage lysing strains of Y. enterocolitica, Y. pseudotuberculosis and Y. pestis (Schwudke et al, 2008).

Reduction of bacterial cell numbers in broth

Overnight cultures of bacterial strains were diluted to a final cell number of approximately 1x105 cfu/ml. 1ml phage lysate or SM buffer (negative control) was added to 1ml of the diluted culture. The mixture was incubated at 37oC (microaerobic/aerobic) or 4oC (aerobic). The initial bacterial host concentration was kept constant in all assays at approximately 1x105 cfu/ml. Bacterial counts were determined after 0, 6, 24, 27, 30, 48, 72 and 168 hours. The following MOIs were applied: high MOI for C. jejuni (102), and for C. coli and Y. enterocolitica (104); low MOI for C. jejuni and C. coli (101), and for Y. enterocolitica (102).

Reduction of bacterial cell numbers in meat

Raw chicken and pork meat was tested to be free of Campylobacter spp. and Yersinia spp. Meat was sliced aseptically into portions of 10gm, frozen at -20oC, and defrosted in a refrigerator 24hr prior to use. Campylobacter and Yersinia strains were grown overnight in NZCYM medium at 37oC under microaerobic (Campylobacter) resp. aerobic (Yersinia) conditions. Each meat portion was inoculated with 100μl of the diluted bacterial suspensions (approximately 1x106 cfu/ml). Bacteria were allowed to attach to the matrix for 30min at room temperature. Thereafter, 1ml of the corresponding phage lysate or SM buffer was added. All samples were vacuum sealed and stored either at 37oC or at 4oC, depending on the experimental setup. At each sampling time, inoculated meat pieces were diluted 1:10 with NZCYM medium, blended for 2min, and serially diluted with NZCYM medium before being spread onto mCCDA or CIN agar plates. For the enumeration of the bacteria, plates were incubated for 48hr (Campylobacter) or 24hr (Yersinia). All experiments were performed in triplicates. Statistical differences between bacterial cell numbers in the samples were assessed by using the Mann-Whitney-U test.

RESULTS

All three phages reduced the numbers of their hosts in broth at 37oC. While the Campylobacter phages CP81 and NCTC12684 yielded reductions of only 1-2 log10 units, irrespectively of the applied MOI, PY100 reduced Y. enterocolitica cell numbers at a MOI of 102 by up to 3 log10 units (after 24hr) and at a MOI of 104 by up to 5 log10 units (after 1.5hr) (Figure 1). No growth inhibition of C. jejuni and C. coli was observed at 4oC in broth at any MOI (Figure 2 A and B). At this temperature, Y. enterocolitica cell numbers were reduced by up to 1 log10 unit (low MOI) after 24hr and up to 3 log10 units (high MOI) after 24hr (Figure 2C).
Figure 1.

Phage-induced lysis of Campylobacter and Yersinia in broth at 37oC. A. C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (Phage CP81). B. C. coli NCTC 12668 (Phage NCTC12684). C. Y. enterocolitica 83/88/2 (Phage PY100).

Figure 2.

Phage-induced lysis of Campylobacter and Yersinia in broth at 4oC. A. C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (Phage CP81). B. C. coli NCTC 12668 (Phage NCTC12684). C. Y. enterocolitica 83/88/2 (Phage PY100).

Phage-induced lysis of Campylobacter and Yersinia in broth at 37oC. A. C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (Phage CP81). B. C. coli NCTC 12668 (Phage NCTC12684). C. Y. enterocolitica 83/88/2 (Phage PY100). Phage-induced lysis of Campylobacter and Yersinia in broth at 4oC. A. C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (Phage CP81). B. C. coli NCTC 12668 (Phage NCTC12684). C. Y. enterocolitica 83/88/2 (Phage PY100). Due to restricted growth of Campylobacter at 4oC, experiments with chicken meat (Campylobacter assays) and pork meat (Y. enterocolitica assays) were exclusively carried out at high MOIs allowing lysis from without. Though, both Campylobacter phages did not lyse their host in chicken meat at 4oC (Figure 3A and B). By contrast, phage PY100 reduced the Y. enterocolitica cell numbers in pork meat significantly by approximately 2 log10 units after 24hr (Figure 3C).
Figure 3.

Phage-induced lysis of Campylobacter and Yersinia in meat at 4oC. A. C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (Phage CP81). B. C. coli NCTC 12668 (Phage NCTC12684). C. Y. enterocolitica 83/88/2 (Phage PY100). (*p <0.05)

□ control

▴ high MOI

Phage-induced lysis of Campylobacter and Yersinia in meat at 4oC. A. C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (Phage CP81). B. C. coli NCTC 12668 (Phage NCTC12684). C. Y. enterocolitica 83/88/2 (Phage PY100). (*p <0.05) □ control ▴ high MOI

DISCUSSION

In this study the potential of the three phages to control foodborne pathogens at the post-harvest level was analysed. We ascertained that at 37oC the Campylobacter phages CP81 and NCTC12684 reduced the cell numbers of their respective host in broth, whereas no reduction was observed at 4oC, even at a high MOI (102 resp 104). The phages probably did not cause lysis from without under these conditions. Other studies demonstrated phage-induced lysis of Campylobacter at 4oC, where an up to 1 log10 unit reduction on chicken skin and in cooked and raw meat was achieved (Atterbury et al, 2003; Goode et al, 2003; Bigwood et al, 2008). As the lysis of Campylobacter at refrigeration temperatures is rather limited, post-harvest application of phages is apparently not a promising tool to reduce the Campylobacter load on carcasses or meat. On the other hand, high Campylobacter cell number reductions (2-5 log10 units) by phage were obtained in chickens at the pre-harvest level (Loc Carrillo et al, 2005; Wagenaar et al, 2005; El-Shibiny et al, 2009). Contrary to the Campylobacter phages, Yersinia phage PY100 significantly reduced cell numbers of its host at 4oC in broth and in pork meat. The most efficient reductions occurred at the highest MOI. The data are consistent with previously published studies, in which a control of various pathogens was accomplished by application of high phage numbers (Goode et al, 2003; Leverentz et al, 2004; O'Flynn et al, 2004; Carlton et al, 2005; Guenther et al, 2009). To our knowledge, this is the first report on an application of phage to reduce Yersinia cell numbers in food.

CONCLUSION

An application of virulent bacteriophages for the control of Y. enterocolitica at the post-harvest level seems to be promising, whereas the potential of phages to control Campylobacter in food appears to be limited.
  21 in total

1.  Effect of phage on survival of Salmonella enteritidis during manufacture and storage of cheddar cheese made from raw and pasteurized milk.

Authors:  R Modi; Y Hirvi; A Hill; M W Griffiths
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.077

2.  Reduction of Listeria monocytogenes on the surface of fresh channel catfish fillets by bacteriophage Listex P100.

Authors:  Kamlesh A Soni; Ramakrishna Nannapaneni; Steven Hagens
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.171

3.  Bacteriophage significantly reduces Listeria monocytogenes on raw salmon fillet tissue.

Authors:  Kamlesh A Soni; Ramakrishna Nannapaneni
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.077

4.  Phage inactivation of foodborne pathogens on cooked and raw meat.

Authors:  T Bigwood; J A Hudson; C Billington; G V Carey-Smith; J A Heinemann
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.516

5.  Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes in cooked ham by virulent bacteriophages and protective cultures.

Authors:  A Holck; J Berg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Characterisation of 16 Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli typing bacteriophages.

Authors:  A D Sails; D R Wareing; F J Bolton; A J Fox; A Curry
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Application of a group II Campylobacter bacteriophage to reduce strains of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli colonizing broiler chickens.

Authors:  Ayman El-Shibiny; Andrew Scott; Andrew Timms; Yasser Metawea; Phillippa Connerton; Ian Connerton
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.077

8.  Virulent bacteriophage for efficient biocontrol of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods.

Authors:  Susanne Guenther; Dominique Huwyler; Simon Richard; Martin J Loessner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Bacteria-eating virus approved as food additive.

Authors:  Linda Bren
Journal:  FDA Consum       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

10.  Bacteriophage therapy to reduce Campylobacter jejuni colonization of broiler chickens.

Authors:  C Loc Carrillo; R J Atterbury; A el-Shibiny; P L Connerton; E Dillon; A Scott; I F Connerton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Phage Biocontrol of Campylobacter: A One Health Approach.

Authors:  Sophie Kittler; Severin Steffan; Elisa Peh; Madeleine Plötz
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Yersinia enterocolitica-Specific Infection by Bacteriophages TG1 and ϕR1-RT Is Dependent on Temperature-Regulated Expression of the Phage Host Receptor OmpF.

Authors:  Carlos G Leon-Velarde; Lotta Happonen; Maria Pajunen; Katarzyna Leskinen; Andrew M Kropinski; Laura Mattinen; Monika Rajtor; Joanna Zur; Darren Smith; Shu Chen; Ayesha Nawaz; Roger P Johnson; Joseph A Odumeru; Mansel W Griffiths; Mikael Skurnik
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Primary isolation strain determines both phage type and receptors recognised by Campylobacter jejuni bacteriophages.

Authors:  Martine C Holst Sørensen; Yilmaz Emre Gencay; Tina Birk; Signe Berg Baldvinsson; Claudia Jäckel; Jens A Hammerl; Christina S Vegge; Horst Neve; Lone Brøndsted
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Isolation and characterization of a bacteriophage phiEap-2 infecting multidrug resistant Enterobacter aerogenes.

Authors:  Erna Li; Xiao Wei; Yanyan Ma; Zhe Yin; Huan Li; Weishi Lin; Xuesong Wang; Chao Li; Zhiqiang Shen; Ruixiang Zhao; Huiying Yang; Aimin Jiang; Wenhui Yang; Jing Yuan; Xiangna Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  BtuB-Dependent Infection of the T5-like Yersinia Phage ϕR2-01.

Authors:  Lotta J Happonen; Maria I Pajunen; Jin Woo Jun; Mikael Skurnik
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 6.  Phage therapy: eco-physiological pharmacology.

Authors:  Stephen T Abedon
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2014-05-20

7.  Reduction of Campylobacter jejuni in broiler chicken by successive application of group II and group III phages.

Authors:  Jens A Hammerl; Claudia Jäckel; Thomas Alter; Pawel Janzcyk; Kerstin Stingl; Marie Theres Knüver; Stefan Hertwig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Yersinia Phages and Food Safety.

Authors:  Carlos G Leon-Velarde; Jin Woo Jun; Mikael Skurnik
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.048

9.  The Yersinia Phage X1 Administered Orally Efficiently Protects a Murine Chronic Enteritis Model Against Yersinia enterocolitica Infection.

Authors:  Yibing Xue; Shengjie Zhai; Zijing Wang; Yalu Ji; Gang Wang; Tianqi Wang; Xinwu Wang; Hengyu Xi; Ruopeng Cai; Rihong Zhao; Hao Zhang; Lanting Bi; Yuan Guan; Zhimin Guo; Wenyu Han; Jingmin Gu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Isolation and Characterization of Group III Campylobacter jejuni-Specific Bacteriophages From Germany and Their Suitability for Use in Food Production.

Authors:  Severin Michael Steffan; Golshan Shakeri; Jens Andre Hammerl; Corinna Kehrenberg; Elisa Peh; Manfred Rohde; Claudia Jackel; Madeleine Plotz; Sophie Kittler
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 5.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.