PURPOSE: Anticancer drug development is inefficient, but genetically engineered murine models (GEMM) and orthotopic, syngeneic transplants (OST) of cancer may offer advantages to in vitro and xenograft systems. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We assessed the activity of 16 treatment regimens in a RAS-driven, Ink4a/Arf-deficient melanoma GEMM. In addition, we tested a subset of treatment regimens in three breast cancer models representing distinct breast cancer subtypes: claudin-low (T11 OST), basal-like (C3-TAg GEMM), and luminal B (MMTV-Neu GEMM). RESULTS: Like human RAS-mutant melanoma, the melanoma GEMM was refractory to chemotherapy and single-agent small molecule therapies. Combined treatment with AZD6244 [mitogen-activated protein-extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor] and BEZ235 [dual phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor] was the only treatment regimen to exhibit significant antitumor activity, showed by marked tumor regression and improved survival. Given the surprising activity of the "AZD/BEZ" combination in the melanoma GEMM, we next tested this regimen in the "claudin-low" breast cancer model that shares gene expression features with melanoma. The AZD/BEZ regimen also exhibited significant activity in this model, leading us to testing in even more diverse GEMMs of basal-like and luminal breast cancer. The AZD/BEZ combination was highly active in these distinct breast cancer models, showing equal or greater efficacy compared with any other regimen tested in studies of over 700 tumor-bearing mice. This regimen even exhibited activity in lapatinib-resistant HER2(+) tumors. CONCLUSION: These results show the use of credentialed murine models for large-scale efficacy testing of diverse anticancer regimens and predict that combinations of PI3K/mTOR and MEK inhibitors will show antitumor activity in a wide range of human malignancies.
PURPOSE: Anticancer drug development is inefficient, but genetically engineered murine models (GEMM) and orthotopic, syngeneic transplants (OST) of cancer may offer advantages to in vitro and xenograft systems. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We assessed the activity of 16 treatment regimens in a RAS-driven, Ink4a/Arf-deficient melanoma GEMM. In addition, we tested a subset of treatment regimens in three breast cancer models representing distinct breast cancer subtypes: claudin-low (T11 OST), basal-like (C3-TAg GEMM), and luminal B (MMTV-Neu GEMM). RESULTS: Like human RAS-mutant melanoma, the melanoma GEMM was refractory to chemotherapy and single-agent small molecule therapies. Combined treatment with AZD6244 [mitogen-activated protein-extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor] and BEZ235 [dual phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor] was the only treatment regimen to exhibit significant antitumor activity, showed by marked tumor regression and improved survival. Given the surprising activity of the "AZD/BEZ" combination in the melanoma GEMM, we next tested this regimen in the "claudin-low" breast cancer model that shares gene expression features with melanoma. The AZD/BEZ regimen also exhibited significant activity in this model, leading us to testing in even more diverse GEMMs of basal-like and luminal breast cancer. The AZD/BEZ combination was highly active in these distinct breast cancer models, showing equal or greater efficacy compared with any other regimen tested in studies of over 700 tumor-bearing mice. This regimen even exhibited activity in lapatinib-resistant HER2(+) tumors. CONCLUSION: These results show the use of credentialed murine models for large-scale efficacy testing of diverse anticancer regimens and predict that combinations of PI3K/mTOR and MEK inhibitors will show antitumor activity in a wide range of humanmalignancies.
Authors: Matthew H Kulke; George D Demetri; Norman E Sharpless; David P Ryan; Ramesh Shivdasani; Jeffrey S Clark; Bruce M Spiegelman; Haesook Kim; Robert J Mayer; Charles S Fuchs Journal: Cancer J Date: 2002 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.360
Authors: M R Middleton; J J Grob; N Aaronson; G Fierlbeck; W Tilgen; S Seiter; M Gore; S Aamdal; J Cebon; A Coates; B Dreno; M Henz; D Schadendorf; A Kapp; J Weiss; U Fraass; P Statkevich; M Muller; N Thatcher Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: L Chin; J Pomerantz; D Polsky; M Jacobson; C Cohen; C Cordon-Cardo; J W Horner; R A DePinho Journal: Genes Dev Date: 1997-11-01 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Antoinette Hollestelle; Jord H A Nagel; Marcel Smid; Suzanne Lam; Fons Elstrodt; Marijke Wasielewski; Ser Sue Ng; Pim J French; Justine K Peeters; Marieke J Rozendaal; Muhammad Riaz; Daphne G Koopman; Timo L M Ten Hagen; Bertie H C G M de Leeuw; Ellen C Zwarthoff; Amina Teunisse; Peter J van der Spek; Jan G M Klijn; Winand N M Dinjens; Stephen P Ethier; Hans Clevers; Aart G Jochemsen; Michael A den Bakker; John A Foekens; John W M Martens; Mieke Schutte Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2009-07-11 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Zhijian He; Anita Schulz; Xiaomeng Wan; Joshua Seitz; Herdis Bludau; Daria Y Alakhova; David B Darr; Charles M Perou; Rainer Jordan; Iwao Ojima; Alexander V Kabanov; Robert Luxenhofer Journal: J Control Release Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Craig C Carson; Stergios J Moschos; Sharon N Edmiston; David B Darr; Nana Nikolaishvili-Feinberg; Pamela A Groben; Xin Zhou; Pei Fen Kuan; Shaily Pandey; Keefe T Chan; Jamie L Jordan; Honglin Hao; Jill S Frank; Dennis A Hopkinson; David C Gibbs; Virginia D Alldredge; Eloise Parrish; Sara C Hanna; Paula Berkowitz; David S Rubenstein; C Ryan Miller; James E Bear; David W Ollila; Norman E Sharpless; Kathleen Conway; Nancy E Thomas Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Christian Posch; Homayoun Moslehi; Luzviminda Feeney; Gary A Green; Anoosheh Ebaee; Valentin Feichtenschlager; Kim Chong; Lily Peng; Michelle T Dimon; Thomas Phillips; Adil I Daud; Timothy H McCalmont; Philip E LeBoit; Susana Ortiz-Urda Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Erin E Talbert; Jennifer Yang; Thomas A Mace; Matthew R Farren; Alton B Farris; Gregory S Young; Omar Elnaggar; Zheng Che; Cynthia D Timmers; Priyani Rajasekera; Jennifer M Maskarinec; Mark Bloomston; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Denis C Guttridge; Gregory B Lesinski Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Capucine Van Rechem; Joshua C Black; Myriam Boukhali; Martin J Aryee; Susanne Gräslund; Wilhelm Haas; Cyril H Benes; Johnathan R Whetstine Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Zhao Chen; Esra Akbay; Oliver Mikse; Tanya Tupper; Katherine Cheng; Yuchuan Wang; Xiaohong Tan; Abigail Altabef; Sue-Ann Woo; Liang Chen; Jacob B Reibel; Pasi A Janne; Norman E Sharpless; Jeffrey A Engelman; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Andrew L Kung; Kwok-Kin Wong Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Sara A Flanigan; Todd M Pitts; Timothy P Newton; Gillian N Kulikowski; Aik Choon Tan; Martine C McManus; Anna Spreafico; Maria I Kachaeva; Heather M Selby; John J Tentler; S Gail Eckhardt; Stephen Leong Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jon S Zawistowski; Kazuhiro Nakamura; Joel S Parker; Deborah A Granger; Brian T Golitz; Gary L Johnson Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 4.272