Literature DB >> 22871226

Analysis of 777 cases with obstruction of the ureter or extrahepatic bile duct by ultrasonography after normal saline retention enema.

Chong Tang1, Xuegang Wu, Qiuhong Fan, Zhensheng Deng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional transabdominal ultrasound usually fails to visualize parts of the ureter or extrahepatic bile duct covered by bowel gas. In this study, we propose a new method for gaining acoustic access to the ureters and extrahepatic bile duct to help determine the nature of obstruction to these structures when conventional transabdominal ultrasound fails.
METHODS: The normal saline retention enema method, that is, using normal saline-filled colons to gain acoustic access to the bilateral ureters and extrahepatic bile duct and detecting the lesions with transabdominal ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus, was applied to 777 patients with obstructive lesions, including 603 with hydroureter and 174 with dilated common bile duct, which were not visualized by conventional ultrasonography. The follow-up data of all the patients were collected to verify the results obtained by this method.
RESULTS: Of the 755 patients who successfully finished the examination after normal saline retention enema (the success rate of the enema is about 98%), the nature of obstruction in 718 patients was determined (the visualizing rate is approximately 95%), including 533 with ureteral calculus, 23 with ureteral stricture, 129 with extrahepatic bile duct calculus, and 33 with common bile duct tumor.
CONCLUSIONS: Colons filled fully with normal saline can surely give acoustic access to the bilateral ureters and extrahepatic bile duct so as to determine the nature of obstruction of these structures when conventional transabdominal ultrasound fails.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22871226      PMCID: PMC3395038          DOI: 10.1186/2036-7902-4-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J        ISSN: 2036-3176


  9 in total

1.  Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi.

Authors:  A Andrew Ray; Daniela Ghiculete; Kenneth T Pace; R John D'A Honey
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Ultrasound findings in urolithiasis in the lower ureter.

Authors:  K Ohnishi; H Watanabe; H Ohe; M Saitoh
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Carcinosarcoma of the extrahepatic bile duct.

Authors:  Jun Kadono; Nobuo Hamada; Michiyo Higashi; Naoki Ishizaki; Noboru Nakamura; Ryuzo Sakata
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2005

4.  The misdiagnosis of common bile duct stones with ultrasound.

Authors:  K C Dewbury; C L Smith
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. The use of a liquid-filled stomach method.

Authors:  M Fukuda; Y Nakano; K Saito; K Hirata; S Terada; I Urushizaki
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1984

6.  Improved sonographic visualization of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  B Dong; M Chen
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.910

7.  Ultrasonic evaluation of common bile duct stones: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  B H Gross; L P Harter; R M Gore; P W Callen; R A Filly; H A Shapiro; H I Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Choledocholithiasis and cystic duct obstruction: difficult ultrasonographic diagnosis.

Authors:  F C Laing; R B Jeffrey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Patient radiation dose at CT urography and conventional urography.

Authors:  Richard D Nawfel; Philip F Judy; A Robert Schleipman; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 11.105

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.