Literature DB >> 22871168

A probabilistic framework for peptide and protein quantification from data-dependent and data-independent LC-MS proteomics experiments.

Keith Richardson1, Richard Denny, Chris Hughes, John Skilling, Jacek Sikora, Michał Dadlez, Angel Manteca, Hye Ryung Jung, Ole Nørregaard Jensen, Virginie Redeker, Ronald Melki, James I Langridge, Johannes P C Vissers.   

Abstract

A probability-based quantification framework is presented for the calculation of relative peptide and protein abundance in label-free and label-dependent LC-MS proteomics data. The results are accompanied by credible intervals and regulation probabilities. The algorithm takes into account data uncertainties via Poisson statistics modified by a noise contribution that is determined automatically during an initial normalization stage. Protein quantification relies on assignments of component peptides to the acquired data. These assignments are generally of variable reliability and may not be present across all of the experiments comprising an analysis. It is also possible for a peptide to be identified to more than one protein in a given mixture. For these reasons the algorithm accepts a prior probability of peptide assignment for each intensity measurement. The model is constructed in such a way that outliers of any type can be automatically reweighted. Two discrete normalization methods can be employed. The first method is based on a user-defined subset of peptides, while the second method relies on the presence of a dominant background of endogenous peptides for which the concentration is assumed to be unaffected. Normalization is performed using the same computational and statistical procedures employed by the main quantification algorithm. The performance of the algorithm will be illustrated on example data sets, and its utility demonstrated for typical proteomics applications. The quantification algorithm supports relative protein quantification based on precursor and product ion intensities acquired by means of data-dependent methods, originating from all common isotopically-labeled approaches, as well as label-free ion intensity-based data-independent methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22871168      PMCID: PMC3721451          DOI: 10.1089/omi.2012.0019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  OMICS        ISSN: 1536-2310


  62 in total

1.  Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search.

Authors:  Andrew Keller; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Eugene Kolker; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  A novel precursor ion discovery method on a hybrid quadrupole orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer for studying protein phosphorylation.

Authors:  R H Bateman; R Carruthers; J B Hoyes; C Jones; J I Langridge; A Millar; J P C Vissers
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 3.  Design and analysis of experiments with high throughput biological assay data.

Authors:  David M Rocke
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.727

4.  Aligning families of two-dimensional gels by a combined multiresolution forward-inverse transformation approach.

Authors:  Florian A Potra; Xing Liu
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.479

5.  Precision proteomics: the case for high resolution and high mass accuracy.

Authors:  Matthias Mann; Neil L Kelleher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  How much peptide sequence information is contained in ion trap tandem mass spectra?

Authors:  Jürgen Cox; Nina C Hubner; Matthias Mann
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Difference gel electrophoresis: a single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts.

Authors:  M Unlü; M E Morgan; J S Minden
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.535

8.  Misuse of statistical test in three decades of psychotherapy research.

Authors:  R Dar; R C Serlin; H Omer
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1994-02

9.  Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents.

Authors:  Philip L Ross; Yulin N Huang; Jason N Marchese; Brian Williamson; Kenneth Parker; Stephen Hattan; Nikita Khainovski; Sasi Pillai; Subhakar Dey; Scott Daniels; Subhasish Purkayastha; Peter Juhasz; Stephen Martin; Michael Bartlet-Jones; Feng He; Allan Jacobson; Darryl J Pappin
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Precursor-ion mass re-estimation improves peptide identification on hybrid instruments.

Authors:  Roland Luethy; Darren E Kessner; Jonathan E Katz; Brendan Maclean; Robert Grothe; Kian Kani; Vitor Faça; Sharon Pitteri; Samir Hanash; David B Agus; Parag Mallick
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 4.466

View more
  5 in total

1.  Bioinformatics challenges and solutions in proteomics as quantitative methods mature.

Authors:  Andrew R Jones
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2012-07-17

2.  OLFM4, KNG1 and Sec24C identified by proteomics and immunohistochemistry as potential markers of early colorectal cancer stages.

Authors:  Marie-Alice Meuwis; Edouard Louis; Florence Quesada-Calvo; Charlotte Massot; Virginie Bertrand; Rémi Longuespée; Noëlla Blétard; Joan Somja; Gabriel Mazzucchelli; Nicolas Smargiasso; Dominique Baiwir; Marie-Claire De Pauw-Gillet; Philippe Delvenne; Michel Malaise; Carla Coimbra Marques; Marc Polus; Edwin De Pauw
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.988

3.  Specificity of the osmotic stress response in Candida albicans highlighted by quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Mette D Jacobsen; Robert J Beynon; Lee A Gethings; Amy J Claydon; James I Langridge; Johannes P C Vissers; Alistair J P Brown; Dean E Hammond
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A comprehensive LFQ benchmark dataset on modern day acquisition strategies in proteomics.

Authors:  Bart Van Puyvelde; Simon Daled; Sander Willems; Ralf Gabriels; Anne Gonzalez de Peredo; Karima Chaoui; Emmanuelle Mouton-Barbosa; David Bouyssié; Kurt Boonen; Christopher J Hughes; Lee A Gethings; Yasset Perez-Riverol; Nic Bloomfield; Stephen Tate; Odile Schiltz; Lennart Martens; Dieter Deforce; Maarten Dhaenens
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 6.444

5.  Paper Spray Ionization Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry of Sebum Classifies Biomarker Classes for the Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Depanjan Sarkar; Eleanor Sinclair; Sze Hway Lim; Caitlin Walton-Doyle; Kaneez Jafri; Joy Milne; Johannes P C Vissers; Keith Richardson; Drupad K Trivedi; Monty Silverdale; Perdita Barran
Journal:  JACS Au       Date:  2022-09-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.