Literature DB >> 22869232

LASIK for presbyopia correction in emmetropic patients using aspheric ablation profiles and a micro-monovision protocol with the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL 80 and VisuMax.

Dan Z Reinstein1, Glenn I Carp, Timothy J Archer, Marine Gobbe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the monocular and binocular visual outcomes of LASIK with an aspheric micro-mono-vision protocol in emmetropic patients with presbyopia.
METHODS: A retrospective, noncomparative case series included 296 eyes from 148 consecutive emmetropic patients with presbyopia who were treated with LASIK-induced micro-monovision. The CRS-Master software was used to generate ablation profiles for the MEL 80 excimer laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) and flaps were created using the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec). The target refraction was plano for distance eyes (dominant eye) and between -1.00 and -1.88 diopters (D) for near eyes. Patients were followed for 1 year. Emmetropia was defined for inclusion as spherical equivalent refraction ⩾- 0.88 D, sphere ⩽+1.00 D, and cylinder ⩽1.25 D. Median patient age was 55 years (range: 44 to 65 years). Median follow-up was 12.9 months.
RESULTS: Mean deviation from intended correction was +0.02±0.35 D, with 91% within ±0.50 D and 100% within ±1.00 D. Of distance eyes, 95% achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 or better and 100% achieved 20/32 or better. Binocularly, 98% of patients achieved UDVA of 20/20 or better and 100% achieved 20/32 or better; 96% achieved uncorrected near visual acuity of J2 and 99% could read J3 or better. No eyes lost 2 or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity. An average increase of 0.05 logMAR was noted in distance-corrected near visual acuity. A small increase occurred in mesopic contrast sensitivity (CSV-1000, VectorVision Inc) at 3 cycles per degree (cpd) (P=.016) and no change at 6, 12, or 18 cpd.
CONCLUSIONS: This aspheric micro-monovision protocol was a well-tolerated and effective procedure for treating emmetropic patients with presbyopia. Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22869232     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20120723-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  16 in total

1.  Visual quality assessment after presbyopic laser in-situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Dong Hui Lim; Eui-Sang Chung; Myoung Joon Kim; Tae-Young Chung
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Refractive surgery beyond 2020.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  Implantable inlay devices for presbyopia: the evidence to date.

Authors:  Em Arlt; Em Krall; S Moussa; G Grabner; Ak Dexl
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-14

4.  Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis multifocal ablation profile using a mini-monovision approach for presbyopic patients with hyperopia.

Authors:  Iraklis Vastardis; Brigitte Pajic-Eggspühler; Jörg Müller; Zeljka Cvejic; Bojan Pajic
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-14

Review 5.  Corneal Refractive Procedures for the Treatment of Presbyopia.

Authors:  Kareem Moussa; Naz Jehangir; Tova Mannis; Wai L Wong; Majid Moshirfar
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2017-04-27

Review 6.  Corneal compensation of presbyopia: PresbyLASIK: an updated review.

Authors:  Veronica Vargas-Fragoso; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-04-13

Review 7.  Review of Static Approaches to Surgical Correction of Presbyopia.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Zare Mehrjerdi; Masomeh Mohebbi; Mehdi Zandian
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

8.  Comparison of a hydrogel corneal inlay and monovision laser in situ keratomileusis in presbyopic patients: focus on visual performance and optical quality.

Authors:  Cornelis Verdoorn
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-20

9.  Vignetting and field of view with the KAMRA corneal inlay.

Authors:  Achim Langenbucher; Susanne Goebels; Nóra Szentmáry; Berthold Seitz; Timo Eppig
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Correction of presbyopia: An integrated update for the practical surgeon.

Authors:  Marie Joan Therese D Balgos; Veronica Vargas; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.