Literature DB >> 22867680

Predictors of persistent complaints after a knee injury in primary care.

Harry P A Wagemakers1, Pim A J Luijsterburg, Edith M Heintjes, Marjolein Y Berger, Jan A N Verhaar, Bart W Koes, Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prognosis of persistent complaints after knee injury is based on secondary care populations. In a primary care setting, however, no studies have addressed this issue. AIM: To identify possible predictors of persistent complaints 1 year after a knee injury. These predictors are important for guiding the GP's therapeutic management, and giving advice to patients about work and/or sports-related activities. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Primary care prospective cohort study with a 1-year follow-up period in five municipalities in the southwest region of the Netherlands.
METHOD: Patients who were eligible were recruited to the study by a GP research network with around 84,000 patients and 40 participating GPs. A total of 134 patients (aged 18-65 years) who consulted their GP within 5 weeks after a knee injury entered the study. Follow-up after 1 year was conducted in 122 patients. The main outcome was persistent complaints 1 year after injury; possible predictors for these complaints were obtained with a questionnaire, a physical examination, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), according to a standardised protocol.
RESULTS: After 1 year, of the 122 available patients, 21 (17%) reported persistent complaints and 101 (83%) reported full recovery or major improvement. In this study being aged >40 years had a significant association (P<0.05) with persistent complaints (odds ratio 8.0, 95% confidence interval 2.1 to 30.5). Physical examination and MRI findings revealed no predictors that were associated with these complaints.
CONCLUSION: Being aged >40 years was the only determinant with a significant association with persistent complaints. As physical examination and MRI had no predictive value, they are not recommended for prognosis of persistent complaints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22867680      PMCID: PMC3404334          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X653615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  30 in total

Review 1.  Follow-up of posttraumatic ligamentous and meniscal knee lesions detected at MR imaging: systematic review.

Authors:  Simone S Boks; Dammis Vroegindeweij; Bart W Koes; M G Myriam Hunink; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Factors affecting outcome after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective study with a six-year follow-up.

Authors:  L R Swirtun; P Renström
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 3.  Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christian D Mallen; George Peat; Elaine Thomas; Kate M Dunn; Peter R Croft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  The course and prognosis of hip complaints in general practice.

Authors:  Johanna M van der Waal; Sandra D M Bot; Caroline B Terwee; Danielle A W M van der Windt; Lex M Bouter; Joost Dekker
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2006-06

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in symptomatic and contralateral knees: prevalence and associations with traumatic history in general practice.

Authors:  Simone S Boks; Dammis Vroegindeweij; Bart W Koes; Myriam M G M Hunink; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 6.  The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis.

Authors:  L Stefan Lohmander; P Martin Englund; Ludvig L Dahl; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Self-efficacy of knee function as a pre-operative predictor of outcome 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Pia Thomeé; Peter Währborg; Mats Börjesson; Roland Thomeé; B I Eriksson; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Change in self-reported outcomes and objective physical function over 7 years in middle-aged subjects with or at high risk of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  E M Roos; A B Bremander; M Englund; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Diagnostic value of history-taking and physical examination for assessing meniscal tears of the knee in general practice.

Authors:  Harry Pa Wagemakers; Edith M Heintjes; Simone S Boks; Marjolein Y Berger; Jan An Verhaar; Bart W Koes; Sita Ma Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.638

10.  Knee disorders in primary care: design and patient selection of the HONEUR knee cohort.

Authors:  Edith M Heintjes; Marjolein Y Berger; Bart W Koes; Sita M Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-08-23       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  1 in total

1.  Long-term persistence of knee pain and occupational exposure in two large prospective cohorts of workers.

Authors:  Eléonore Herquelot; Julie Bodin; Audrey Petit; Catherine Ha; Annette Leclerc; Marcel Goldberg; Marie Zins; Yves Roquelaure; Alexis Descatha
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 2.362

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.