BACKGROUND: Prognosis of persistent complaints after knee injury is based on secondary care populations. In a primary care setting, however, no studies have addressed this issue. AIM: To identify possible predictors of persistent complaints 1 year after a knee injury. These predictors are important for guiding the GP's therapeutic management, and giving advice to patients about work and/or sports-related activities. DESIGN AND SETTING: Primary care prospective cohort study with a 1-year follow-up period in five municipalities in the southwest region of the Netherlands. METHOD: Patients who were eligible were recruited to the study by a GP research network with around 84,000 patients and 40 participating GPs. A total of 134 patients (aged 18-65 years) who consulted their GP within 5 weeks after a knee injury entered the study. Follow-up after 1 year was conducted in 122 patients. The main outcome was persistent complaints 1 year after injury; possible predictors for these complaints were obtained with a questionnaire, a physical examination, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), according to a standardised protocol. RESULTS: After 1 year, of the 122 available patients, 21 (17%) reported persistent complaints and 101 (83%) reported full recovery or major improvement. In this study being aged >40 years had a significant association (P<0.05) with persistent complaints (odds ratio 8.0, 95% confidence interval 2.1 to 30.5). Physical examination and MRI findings revealed no predictors that were associated with these complaints. CONCLUSION: Being aged >40 years was the only determinant with a significant association with persistent complaints. As physical examination and MRI had no predictive value, they are not recommended for prognosis of persistent complaints.
BACKGROUND: Prognosis of persistent complaints after knee injury is based on secondary care populations. In a primary care setting, however, no studies have addressed this issue. AIM: To identify possible predictors of persistent complaints 1 year after a knee injury. These predictors are important for guiding the GP's therapeutic management, and giving advice to patients about work and/or sports-related activities. DESIGN AND SETTING: Primary care prospective cohort study with a 1-year follow-up period in five municipalities in the southwest region of the Netherlands. METHOD:Patients who were eligible were recruited to the study by a GP research network with around 84,000 patients and 40 participating GPs. A total of 134 patients (aged 18-65 years) who consulted their GP within 5 weeks after a knee injury entered the study. Follow-up after 1 year was conducted in 122 patients. The main outcome was persistent complaints 1 year after injury; possible predictors for these complaints were obtained with a questionnaire, a physical examination, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), according to a standardised protocol. RESULTS: After 1 year, of the 122 available patients, 21 (17%) reported persistent complaints and 101 (83%) reported full recovery or major improvement. In this study being aged >40 years had a significant association (P<0.05) with persistent complaints (odds ratio 8.0, 95% confidence interval 2.1 to 30.5). Physical examination and MRI findings revealed no predictors that were associated with these complaints. CONCLUSION: Being aged >40 years was the only determinant with a significant association with persistent complaints. As physical examination and MRI had no predictive value, they are not recommended for prognosis of persistent complaints.
Authors: Simone S Boks; Dammis Vroegindeweij; Bart W Koes; M G Myriam Hunink; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Johanna M van der Waal; Sandra D M Bot; Caroline B Terwee; Danielle A W M van der Windt; Lex M Bouter; Joost Dekker Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2006-06
Authors: Simone S Boks; Dammis Vroegindeweij; Bart W Koes; Myriam M G M Hunink; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2006-07-21 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Pia Thomeé; Peter Währborg; Mats Börjesson; Roland Thomeé; B I Eriksson; Jon Karlsson Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2007-11-23 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Harry Pa Wagemakers; Edith M Heintjes; Simone S Boks; Marjolein Y Berger; Jan An Verhaar; Bart W Koes; Sita Ma Bierma-Zeinstra Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: Edith M Heintjes; Marjolein Y Berger; Bart W Koes; Sita M Bierma-Zeinstra Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2005-08-23 Impact factor: 2.362