Literature DB >> 22867089

Fixed-dose combination therapy in hypertension: cons.

Fabio Angeli1, Gianpaolo Reboldi, Giovanni Mazzotta, Marta Garofoli, Elisa Ramundo, Cristina Poltronieri, Paolo Verdecchia.   

Abstract

The goal of antihypertensive therapy is to reduce the risk associated with blood pressure elevation. Although the choice of first-line drug therapy may exert some effects on different long-term cardiovascular endpoints, randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses demonstrated that blood pressure reduction per se is the primary determinant in primary and secondary prevention. Numerous analyses carried out over the last years have repeatedly shown that many patients require the combination of two or more drugs to reach the recommended level of blood pressure control. Within this context, combination therapy with separate agents or fixed-dose combination pills offers an attractive ability to lower blood pressure more quickly, decrease adverse effects and reach blood pressure target. It is not clear whether fixed combinations of antihypertensive agents in a single tablet provide a greater benefit than the corresponding components given separately. In other words, it is not clear if the use of fixed combinations translates into a clearly improved blood pressure control and cardiovascular prevention in clinical practice. Fixed-dose combinations may simplify the treatment regimen by reducing the number of pills and may be attractive for many hypertensive patients. However, single-pill (fixed) drug combinations have some disadvantages: (i) branded fixed combinations may be more expensive than equivalent free combinations; (ii) the duration of action of individual components may not be equivalent, and this may not justify a single daily dosing of the combination; and (iii) the use of fixed combinations implies less flexibility in modifying the doses of individual components and the exposure of patients to unnecessary therapy. Moreover, should a patient develop side effects to one component, the entire combination should be discontinued and replaced by free drugs. The following three types of fixed-dose tablets have been recently proposed to give additional flexibility: (i) tablet manufactured so that each of the two drugs is placed at opposite ends of the tablet with a drug-free (inactive) layer placed in between; (ii) tablet with the combination of drugs at each end with the inactive zone in between; and (iii) tablet divided into discrete, separate segments (the two drugs are combined uniformly), which provides benefits for initial close titration and dosage adjustments. Currently, none of the fixed-dose tablets available on the market have these characteristics and, consequently, are unable to be broken to allow sufficient flexibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22867089     DOI: 10.1007/bf03262453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev        ISSN: 1120-9879


  20 in total

1.  Cardiovascular protection and blood pressure reduction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Staessen; J G Wang; L Thijs
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-20       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Fixed combination drugs for cardiovascular disease risk reduction: regulatory approach.

Authors:  David G Orloff
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers for coronary heart disease and stroke prevention.

Authors:  Paolo Verdecchia; Gianpaolo Reboldi; Fabio Angeli; Roberto Gattobigio; Maurizio Bentivoglio; Lutgarde Thijs; Jan A Staessen; Carlo Porcellati
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  The effect of nisoldipine as compared with enalapril on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes and hypertension.

Authors:  R O Estacio; B W Jeffers; W R Hiatt; S L Biggerstaff; N Gifford; R W Schrier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Hydrochlorothiazide versus chlorthalidone: evidence supporting their interchangeability.

Authors:  Barry L Carter; Michael E Ernst; Jerome D Cohen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-11-24       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Treatment of arterial hypertension in diabetic humans: importance of therapeutic selection.

Authors:  G L Bakris; B W Barnhill; R Sadler
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group.

Authors:  L Hansson; A Zanchetti; S G Carruthers; B Dahlöf; D Elmfeldt; S Julius; J Ménard; K H Rahn; H Wedel; S Westerling
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-06-13       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The effects of dietary protein restriction and blood-pressure control on the progression of chronic renal disease. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  S Klahr; A S Levey; G J Beck; A W Caggiula; L Hunsicker; J W Kusek; G Striker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Enhancing dosage flexibility in combination therapy.

Authors:  Barry J Materson
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Antihypertensive Combination Treatment: State of the Art.

Authors:  M Burnier
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  How does prescribing for antihypertensive products stack up against guideline recommendations? An Australian population-based study (2006-2014).

Authors:  Andrea L Schaffer; Sallie-Anne Pearson; Nicholas A Buckley
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Implications of prescribing a fixed-dose combination in clinical cardiology practice: a retrospective observational study using a single medical centre database in Korea.

Authors:  Hyungseop Kim; Hyuck-Jun Yoon; Hyoung-Seob Park; Yun-Kyeong Cho; Chang-Wook Nam; Seongwook Han; Seung-Ho Hur; Yoon-Nyun Kim; Kwon-Bae Kim
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2017-06-26

4.  Fixed-dose combination pharmacologic therapy to improve hypertension control worldwide: Clinical perspective and policy implications.

Authors:  Donald J DiPette; Jamario Skeete; Emily Ridley; Norm R C Campbell; Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo; Sandeep P Kishore; Marc G Jaffe; Antonio Coca; Raymond R Townsend; Pedro Ordunez
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Single-pill combinations: a therapeutic option or necessity for vascular risk treatment?

Authors:  Niki Katsiki; Vasilios G Athyros; Asterios Karagiannis
Journal:  J Drug Assess       Date:  2013-05-07

6.  Comparison of therapy persistence for fixed versus free combination antihypertensives: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Thomas Grimmsmann; Wolfgang Himmel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Fixed-dose combination antihypertensive medications, adherence, and clinical outcomes: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Amol A Verma; Wayne Khuu; Mina Tadrous; Tara Gomes; Muhammad M Mamdani
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 8.  Does the Polypill Improve Patient Adherence Compared to Its Individual Formulations? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ana Baumgartner; Katarina Drame; Stijn Geutjens; Marja Airaksinen
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 6.321

9.  Impact of single-pill combination therapy on adherence, blood pressure control, and clinical outcomes: a rapid evidence assessment of recent literature.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsioufis; Reinhold Kreutz; Georgia Sykara; Joris van Vugt; Tarek Hassan
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.776

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.