Literature DB >> 22866761

Flicker adaptation of low-level cortical visual neurons contributes to temporal dilation.

Laura Ortega1, Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez, Marcia Grabowecky, Satoru Suzuki.   

Abstract

Several seconds of adaptation to a flickered stimulus causes a subsequent brief static stimulus to appear longer in duration. Nonsensory factors, such as increased arousal and attention, have been thought to mediate this flicker-based temporal-dilation aftereffect. In this study, we provide evidence that adaptation of low-level cortical visual neurons contributes to this aftereffect. The aftereffect was significantly reduced by a 45° change in Gabor orientation between adaptation and test. Because orientation-tuning bandwidths are smaller in lower-level cortical visual areas and are approximately 45° in human V1, the result suggests that flicker adaptation of orientation-tuned V1 neurons contributes to the temporal-dilation aftereffect. The aftereffect was abolished when the adaptor and test stimuli were presented to different eyes. Because eye preferences are strong in V1 but diminish in higher-level visual areas, the eye specificity of the aftereffect corroborates the involvement of low-level cortical visual neurons. Our results suggest that flicker adaptation of low-level cortical visual neurons contributes to expanding visual duration. Furthermore, this temporal-dilation aftereffect dissociates from the previously reported temporal-compression aftereffect on the basis of the differences in their orientation and flicker-frequency selectivity, suggesting that the visual system possesses at least two distinct and potentially complementary mechanisms for adaptively coding perceived duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22866761      PMCID: PMC3758686          DOI: 10.1037/a0029495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  53 in total

1.  Direct mapping of ocular dominance columns in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  P Dechent; J Frahm
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-09-28       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Time dilation in dynamic visual display.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Chris L E Paffen; Hinze Hogendoorn; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Quantitative study of striate single unit responses in monkeys performing an orientation discrimination task.

Authors:  R Vogels; G A Orban
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Visual properties of neurons in area V4 of the macaque: sensitivity to stimulus form.

Authors:  R Desimone; S J Schein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. II. Orientation specificity and ocular dominance.

Authors:  P H Schiller; B L Finlay; S F Volman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Visual cortex neurons in monkeys and cats: detection, discrimination, and identification.

Authors:  W S Geisler; D G Albrecht
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the "internal clock".

Authors:  M Treisman
Journal:  Psychol Monogr       Date:  1963

9.  Functional MRI reveals the existence of modality and coordination-dependent timing networks.

Authors:  K J Jantzen; F L Steinberg; J A S Kelso
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Speeding up an internal clock in children? Effects of visual flicker on subjective duration.

Authors:  Sylvie Droit-Volet; John Wearden
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2002-07
View more
  9 in total

1.  Action enhances auditory but not visual temporal sensitivity.

Authors:  Lucica Iordanescu; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

2.  Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.

Authors:  Laura Ortega; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Multiple channels of visual time perception.

Authors:  Aurelio Bruno; Guido Marco Cicchini
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-02-19

4.  The aftereffect of perceived duration is contingent on auditory frequency but not visual orientation.

Authors:  Baolin Li; Xiangyong Yuan; Xiting Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Adaptation reveals multi-stage coding of visual duration.

Authors:  James Heron; Corinne Fulcher; Howard Collins; David Whitaker; Neil W Roach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Visual duration aftereffect is position invariant.

Authors:  Baolin Li; Xiangyong Yuan; Youguo Chen; Peiduo Liu; Xiting Huang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-09

7.  Object size determines the spatial spread of visual time.

Authors:  Corinne Fulcher; Paul V McGraw; Neil W Roach; David Whitaker; James Heron
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Flickering task-irrelevant distractors induce dilation of target duration depending upon cortical distance.

Authors:  Miku Okajima; Yuko Yotsumoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Relative Time Compression for Slow-Motion Stimuli through Rapid Recalibration.

Authors:  Saya Kashiwakura; Isamu Motoyoshi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.