N Schramm1, M D'Anastasi, M F Reiser, C J Zech. 1. Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistrasse 15, Munich, Germany. Nicolai.Schramm@med.uni-muenchen.de
Abstract
CLINICAL PROBLEM: Diffuse liver diseases show an increasing prevalence. The diagnostic gold standard of liver biopsy has several disadvantages. There is a clinical demand for non-invasive imaging-based techniques to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the entire liver. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are routinely used. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Steatosis: chemical shift and frequency selective imaging, MR spectroscopy (MRS). Hemochromatosis: MR-based iron quantification. Fibrosis: MR elastography, diffusion, intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and MR perfusion. PERFORMANCE/ACHIEVEMENTS/PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: T1-weighted in and opposed phase imaging is the clinically most frequently used MR technique to noninvasively detect and quantify steatosis. New methods for quantification that are not influenced by confounders like iron overload are under investigation. The most sensitive method to measure the fat content of the liver is MRS. As data acquisition and analysis remain complex and there is no whole organ coverage, MRS of the liver is not a routine method. With an optimized protocol incorporating T2* sequences, MRI is the modality of choice to quantify iron overload in hemochromatosis. Standard MR sequences cannot depict early stages of liver fibrosis. Advanced MR techniques (e.g. elastography, diffusion, IVIM and perfusion) for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis appear promising but their role has to be further investigated.
CLINICAL PROBLEM: Diffuse liver diseases show an increasing prevalence. The diagnostic gold standard of liver biopsy has several disadvantages. There is a clinical demand for non-invasive imaging-based techniques to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the entire liver. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are routinely used. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Steatosis: chemical shift and frequency selective imaging, MR spectroscopy (MRS). Hemochromatosis: MR-based iron quantification. Fibrosis: MR elastography, diffusion, intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and MR perfusion. PERFORMANCE/ACHIEVEMENTS/PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: T1-weighted in and opposed phase imaging is the clinically most frequently used MR technique to noninvasively detect and quantify steatosis. New methods for quantification that are not influenced by confounders like iron overload are under investigation. The most sensitive method to measure the fat content of the liver is MRS. As data acquisition and analysis remain complex and there is no whole organ coverage, MRS of the liver is not a routine method. With an optimized protocol incorporating T2* sequences, MRI is the modality of choice to quantify iron overload in hemochromatosis. Standard MR sequences cannot depict early stages of liver fibrosis. Advanced MR techniques (e.g. elastography, diffusion, IVIM and perfusion) for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis appear promising but their role has to be further investigated.
Authors: José M Alústiza; José Artetxe; Agustín Castiella; Cristina Agirre; José I Emparanza; Pedro Otazua; Manuel García-Bengoechea; Jesús Barrio; Fernando Mújica; José A Recondo Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-12-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Y Gandon; D Guyader; J F Heautot; M I Reda; J Yaouanq; T Buhé; P Brissot; M Carsin; Y Deugnier Journal: Radiology Date: 1994-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jignesh Patel; Eric E Sigmund; Henry Rusinek; Marcel Oei; James S Babb; Bachir Taouli Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Scott B Reeder; Charles A McKenzie; Angel R Pineda; Huanzhou Yu; Ann Shimakawa; Anja C Brau; Brian A Hargreaves; Garry E Gold; Jean H Brittain Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Leon A Adams; Oliver R Waters; Matthew W Knuiman; Robert R Elliott; John K Olynyk Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-03-17 Impact factor: 10.864