Literature DB >> 7972774

Hemochromatosis: diagnosis and quantification of liver iron with gradient-echo MR imaging.

Y Gandon1, D Guyader, J F Heautot, M I Reda, J Yaouanq, T Buhé, P Brissot, M Carsin, Y Deugnier.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in detection and quantification of liver iron overload.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging at 0.5 T was prospectively performed on 77 patients (67 with liver iron overload and 10 without) who underwent a liver biopsy with biochemical determination of the liver iron concentration (LIC) (normal, < 36 mumol per gram of liver tissue [dry weight]). Ratios of signal intensities and liver T2 relaxation time were calculated from images obtained with spin-echo and breath-hold gradient-echo (GRE) sequences.
RESULTS: Liver-to-tissue signal intensity ratios were better correlated with LIC than T2 relaxation time. Long-echo-time GRE sequences were the most sensitive for detection of slight overload. Thus, high sensitivity (94%) and specificity (90%) were obtained with a liver-to-fat ratio threshold of 1. The quantification of iron with MR imaging was accurate when the LIC was 80-300 mumol/g. For heavy overload, above 300 mumol/g, quantification was impossible owing to complete signal loss. Pancreatic and splenic signal intensity were unchanged in most cases.
CONCLUSION: This method, which can be improved by using more sensitive sequences with a high-field-strength system, should be competitive with biopsy for the diagnosis of substantial liver iron overload.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7972774     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.193.2.7972774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  37 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging quantification of liver iron.

Authors:  Claude B Sirlin; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.266

2.  Evaluation of MR imaging with T1 and T2* mapping for the determination of hepatic iron overload.

Authors:  B Henninger; C Kremser; S Rauch; R Eder; H Zoller; A Finkenstedt; H J Michaely; M Schocke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Different forms of iron accumulation in the liver on MRI.

Authors:  İlkay S İdilman; Deniz Akata; Mustafa Nasuh Özmen; Muşturay Karçaaltıncaba
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Comparison of whole liver and small region-of-interest measurements of MRI liver R2* in children with iron overload.

Authors:  M Beth McCarville; Claudia M Hillenbrand; Ralf B Loeffler; Matthew P Smeltzer; Ruitan Song; Chin-Shang Li; Jane S Hankins
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-03-24

5.  [Contrast in static images in clinical magnetic resonance imaging. Part 2: Sequences for various contrast weightings and applications].

Authors:  F Schick
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Sensitivity of quantitative relaxometry and susceptibility mapping to microscopic iron distribution.

Authors:  Timothy J Colgan; Gesine Knobloch; Scott B Reeder; Diego Hernando
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-18       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  Liver iron content determination by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tziomalos; Vassilios Perifanis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Bone marrow MR imaging as predictors of outcome in hemopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Jun Shen; James F Griffith; Li-Na Cheng; Xiao-Hui Duan; Bi-Ling Liang; Hong-Gui Xu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Quantification of liver iron with MRI: state of the art and remaining challenges.

Authors:  Diego Hernando; Yakir S Levin; Claude B Sirlin; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  Estimating tissue iron burden: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  John C Wood
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 6.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.