Literature DB >> 22864891

Role of patient-specific virtual reality rehearsal in carotid artery stenting.

W I M Willaert1, R Aggarwal, I Van Herzeele, M Plessers, N Stroobant, D Nestel, N Cheshire, F Vermassen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in simulation science permit patient-specific rehearsal of endovascular stenting procedures. This study aimed to evaluate how effectively real interventions are replicated by patient-specific rehearsal technology, and to assess its value as a preparatory tool for the interventionalist and the operating team.
METHODS: All patients deemed candidates for carotid artery stenting procedures with suitable computed tomography images were enrolled. Each team member rehearsed the virtual procedure in the laboratory, simulated operating theatre or angiography suite environment immediately before treating the real patient. Dexterity and qualitative metrics were recorded. Subjective questionnaires used a Likert scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent).
RESULTS: Of 18 patients, three were excluded. In 11 of 15 and 13 of 15 patients respectively endovascular tool use and fluoroscopy angles were identical during rehearsal and the real procedure. In a third of patients, the simulator did not adequately predict difficulties in cannulating the stenotic internal or common carotid arteries. The procedure realism, value in evaluating the case, increase in efficiency in tool use, and potential to increase communication, confidence and team performance were all rated highly (4 of 5).
CONCLUSION: Patient-specific rehearsal was rated highly for both face and content validity. Access strategy, endovascular material use and angiographic imaging were all replicated effectively, although certain biomechanical vessel properties seemed to be replicated to a lesser degree. Patient-specific rehearsal constitutes a unique tool that may help tailor endovascular material choice, and optimize the preoperative preparation of the interventionalist and team.
Copyright © 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22864891     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  6 in total

1.  Carotid Artery Stenting - Strategies to Improve Procedural Performance and Reduce the Learning Curve.

Authors:  Willem Im Willaert; Isabelle Van Herzeele
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2013-03

2.  Interventional radiology virtual simulator for liver biopsy.

Authors:  P F Villard; F P Vidal; L ap Cenydd; R Holbrey; S Pisharody; S Johnson; A Bulpitt; N W John; F Bello; D Gould
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Effect of just-in-time simulation training on provider performance and patient outcomes for clinical procedures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew S Braga; Michelle D Tyler; Jared M Rhoads; Michael P Cacchio; Marc Auerbach; Akira Nishisaki; Robin J Larson
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2015-10-05

4.  Patient-specific mental rehearsal with interactive visual aids: a path worth exploring?

Authors:  Marina Yiasemidou; Raffaele Galli; Daniel Glassman; Matthew Tang; Rahoz Aziz; David Jayne; Danilo Miskovic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Validity of a patient-specific percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) simulated surgical rehearsal platform: impact on patient and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Ahmed Ghazi; Rachel Melnyk; Shamroz Farooq; Adrian Bell; Tyler Holler; Patrick Saba; Jean Joseph
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.661

6.  Rehearsal simulation for antenatal consults.

Authors:  Anita Cheng; Doris Yuen; Sayra Cristancho
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2021-06-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.