Literature DB >> 22864573

Social networks reveal cultural behaviour in tool-using [corrected] dolphins.

Janet Mann1, Margaret A Stanton, Eric M Patterson, Elisa J Bienenstock, Lisa O Singh.   

Abstract

Animal tool use is of inherent interest given its relationship to intelligence, innovation and cultural behaviour. Here we investigate whether Shark Bay bottlenose dolphins that use marine sponges as hunting tools (spongers) are culturally distinct from other dolphins in the population based on the criteria that sponging is both socially learned and distinguishes between groups. We use social network analysis to determine social preferences among 36 spongers and 69 non-spongers sampled over a 22-year period while controlling for location, sex and matrilineal relatedness. Homophily (the tendency to associate with similar others) based on tool-using status was evident in every analysis, although maternal kinship, sex and location also contributed to social preference. Female spongers were more cliquish and preferentially associated with other spongers over non-spongers. Like humans who preferentially associate with others who share their subculture, tool-using dolphins prefer others like themselves, strongly suggesting that sponge tool-use is a cultural behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22864573     DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  15 in total

1.  Genes or culture: are mitochondrial genes associated with tool use in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.)?

Authors:  K Bacher; S Allen; A K Lindholm; L Bejder; M Krützen
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Statistical mechanics of community detection.

Authors:  Jörg Reichardt; Stefan Bornholdt
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2006-07-18

3.  The influence of social affiliation on individual vocal signatures of northern resident killer whales (Orcinus orca).

Authors:  Anna E Nousek; Peter J B Slater; Chao Wang; Patrick J O Miller
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Sensitivity of MRQAP Tests to Collinearity and Autocorrelation Conditions.

Authors:  David Dekker; David Krackhardt; Tom A B Snijders
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Vocal plasticity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): evidence for social factors in the learning of contact calls.

Authors:  S M Farabaugh; A Linzenbold; R J Dooling
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 6.  Social learning in animals: categories and mechanisms.

Authors:  C M Heyes
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1994-05

7.  The question of animal culture.

Authors:  B G Galef
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1992-06

8.  The ecological conditions that favor tool use and innovation in wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.).

Authors:  Eric M Patterson; Janet Mann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Why do dolphins carry sponges?

Authors:  Janet Mann; Brooke L Sargeant; Jana J Watson-Capps; Quincy A Gibson; Michael R Heithaus; Richard C Connor; Eric Patterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Cetaceans have complex brains for complex cognition.

Authors:  Lori Marino; Richard C Connor; R Ewan Fordyce; Louis M Herman; Patrick R Hof; Louis Lefebvre; David Lusseau; Brenda McCowan; Esther A Nimchinsky; Adam A Pack; Luke Rendell; Joy S Reidenberg; Diana Reiss; Mark D Uhen; Estel Van der Gucht; Hal Whitehead
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  If at first you don't succeed... Studies of ontogeny shed light on the cognitive demands of habitual tool use.

Authors:  E J M Meulman; A M Seed; J Mann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  'Captivity bias' in animal tool use and its implications for the evolution of hominin technology.

Authors:  Michael Haslam
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Tool use by aquatic animals.

Authors:  Janet Mann; Eric M Patterson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Friends of friends: are indirect connections in social networks important to animal behaviour?

Authors:  Lauren J N Brent
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Evolution of individual versus social learning on social networks.

Authors:  Kohei Tamura; Yutaka Kobayashi; Yasuo Ihara
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Tool use and social homophily among male bottlenose dolphins.

Authors:  M R Bizzozzero; S J Allen; L Gerber; S Wild; S L King; R C Connor; W R Friedman; S Wittwer; M Krützen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Homophily around specialized foraging underlies dolphin social preferences.

Authors:  A M S Machado; M Cantor; A P B Costa; B P H Righetti; C Bezamat; J V S Valle-Pereira; P C Simões-Lopes; P V Castilho; F G Daura-Jorge
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Cultural transmission of tool use combined with habitat specializations leads to fine-scale genetic structure in bottlenose dolphins.

Authors:  Anna M Kopps; Corinne Y Ackermann; William B Sherwin; Simon J Allen; Lars Bejder; Michael Krützen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Inheritance is where physiology meets evolution.

Authors:  Etienne Danchin; Arnaud Pocheville
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Establishing the reliability of rhesus macaque social network assessment from video observations.

Authors:  Eric Feczko; Thomas A J Mitchell; Hasse Walum; Jenna M Brooks; Thomas R Heitz; Larry J Young; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.