In Kyoon Lyoo1, Sujung Yoon1, Tae-Suk Kim1, Jaeuk Hwang1, Jieun E Kim1, Wangyoun Won1, Sujin Bae1, Perry F Renshaw1. 1. Department of Psychiatry and the Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Seoul National University College of Medicine and College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, South Korea; the Department of Psychiatry, Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; the Brain Institute and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; the Department of Psychiatry, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; and the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Ewha Women's University Graduate School, Seoul, South Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Antidepressants targeting monoaminergic neurotransmitter systems, despite their immediate effects at the synaptic level, usually require several weeks of administration to achieve clinical efficacy. The authors propose a strategy of adding creatine monohydrate (creatine) to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) in the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder. Such augmentation may lead to a more rapid onset of antidepressant effects and a greater treatment response, potentially by restoring brain bioenergetics at the cellular level. METHOD: Fifty-two women with major depressive disorder were enrolled in an 8-week double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial and randomly assigned to receive escitalopram in addition to either creatine (5 g/day, N=25) or placebo (N=27). Efficacy was primarily assessed by changes in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) score. RESULTS: In comparison to the placebo augmentation group, patients receiving creatine augmentation showed significantly greater improvements in HAM-D score, as early as week 2 of treatment. This differential improvement favoring creatine was maintained at weeks 4 and 8. There were no differences between treatment groups in the proportion of patients who discontinued treatment prematurely (creatine: N=8, 32.0%; placebo: N=5, 18.5%) or in the overall frequency of all reported adverse events (creatine: 36 events; placebo: 45 events). CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that creatine augmentation of SSRI treatment may be a promising therapeutic approach that exhibits more rapid and efficacious responses in women with major depressive disorder.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Antidepressants targeting monoaminergic neurotransmitter systems, despite their immediate effects at the synaptic level, usually require several weeks of administration to achieve clinical efficacy. The authors propose a strategy of adding creatine monohydrate (creatine) to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) in the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder. Such augmentation may lead to a more rapid onset of antidepressant effects and a greater treatment response, potentially by restoring brain bioenergetics at the cellular level. METHOD: Fifty-two women with major depressive disorder were enrolled in an 8-week double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial and randomly assigned to receive escitalopram in addition to either creatine (5 g/day, N=25) or placebo (N=27). Efficacy was primarily assessed by changes in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) score. RESULTS: In comparison to the placebo augmentation group, patients receiving creatine augmentation showed significantly greater improvements in HAM-D score, as early as week 2 of treatment. This differential improvement favoring creatine was maintained at weeks 4 and 8. There were no differences between treatment groups in the proportion of patients who discontinued treatment prematurely (creatine: N=8, 32.0%; placebo: N=5, 18.5%) or in the overall frequency of all reported adverse events (creatine: 36 events; placebo: 45 events). CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that creatine augmentation of SSRI treatment may be a promising therapeutic approach that exhibits more rapid and efficacious responses in women with major depressive disorder.
Authors: Marisa M Silveri; Aimee M Parow; Rosemond A Villafuerte; Karen E Damico; Jessica Goren; Andrew L Stoll; Bruce M Cohen; Perry F Renshaw Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-10-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Robert H Andres; Angélique D Ducray; Uwe Schlattner; Theo Wallimann; Hans Rudolf Widmer Journal: Brain Res Bull Date: 2008-03-24 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: H P Volz; R Rzanny; S Riehemann; S May; H Hegewald; B Preussler; G Hübner; W A Kaiser; H Sauer Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 1998 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Mauricio P Cunha; Josiane Budni; Fabiana K Ludka; Francis L Pazini; Julia Macedo Rosa; Ágatha Oliveira; Mark W Lopes; Carla I Tasca; Rodrigo B Leal; Ana Lúcia S Rodrigues Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Mauricio P Cunha; Francis L Pazini; Julia M Rosa; Ana B Ramos-Hryb; Ágatha Oliveira; Manuella P Kaster; Ana Lúcia S Rodrigues Journal: Purinergic Signal Date: 2015-02-22 Impact factor: 3.765
Authors: Natalia Lago; Fernanda N Kaufmann; María Luciana Negro-Demontel; Daniela Alí-Ruiz; Gabriele Ghisleni; Natalia Rego; Andrea Arcas-García; Nathalia Vitureira; Karen Jansen; Luciano M Souza; Ricardo A Silva; Diogo R Lara; Bruno Pannunzio; Juan Andrés Abin-Carriquiry; Jesús Amo-Aparicio; Celia Martin-Otal; Hugo Naya; Dorian B McGavern; Joan Sayós; Rubèn López-Vales; Manuella P Kaster; Hugo Peluffo Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Francis L Pazini; Mauricio P Cunha; Julia M Rosa; André R S Colla; Vicente Lieberknecht; Ágatha Oliveira; Ana Lúcia S Rodrigues Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 5.590