Literature DB >> 22863091

Improved accuracy of genomic prediction for dry matter intake of dairy cattle from combined European and Australian data sets.

Y de Haas1, M P L Calus, R F Veerkamp, E Wall, M P Coffey, H D Daetwyler, B J Hayes, J E Pryce.   

Abstract

With the aim of increasing the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values for dry matter intake (DMI) in dairy cattle, data from Australia (AU), the United Kingdom (UK), and the Netherlands (NL) were combined using both single-trait and multi-trait models. In total, DMI records were available on 1,801 animals, including 843 AU growing heifers with records on DMI measured over 60 to 70 d at approximately 200 d of age, and 359 UK and 599 NL lactating heifers with records on DMI during the first 100 d in milk. The genotypes used in this study were obtained from the Illumina Bovine 50K chip (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA). The AU, UK, and NL genomic data were matched using the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) name. Quality controls were applied by carefully comparing the genotypes of 40 bulls that were available in each data set. This resulted in 30,949 SNP being used in the analyses. Genomic predictions were estimated with genomic REML, using ASReml software. The accuracy of genomic prediction was evaluated in 11 validation sets; that is, at least 3 validation sets per country were defined. The reference set (in which animals had both DMI phenotypes and genotypes) was either AU or Europe (UK and NL) or a multi-country reference set consisting of all data except the validation set. When DMI for each country was treated as the same trait, use of a multi-country reference set increased the accuracy of genomic prediction for DMI in UK, but not in AU and NL. Extending the model to a bivariate (AU-EU) or trivariate (AU-UK-NL) model increased the accuracy of genomic prediction for DMI in all countries. The highest accuracies were estimated for all countries when data were analyzed with a trivariate model, with increases of up to 5.5% compared with univariate models within countries.
Copyright © 2012 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22863091     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-5280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  11 in total

1.  An Equation to Predict the Accuracy of Genomic Values by Combining Data from Multiple Traits, Populations, or Environments.

Authors:  Yvonne C J Wientjes; Piter Bijma; Roel F Veerkamp; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A comparison of principal component regression and genomic REML for genomic prediction across populations.

Authors:  Christos Dadousis; Roel F Veerkamp; Bjørg Heringstad; Marcin Pszczola; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Impact of QTL properties on the accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction.

Authors:  Yvonne C J Wientjes; Mario P L Calus; Michael E Goddard; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 4.  Invited review: overview of new traits and phenotyping strategies in dairy cattle with a focus on functional traits.

Authors:  C Egger-Danner; J B Cole; J E Pryce; N Gengler; B Heringstad; A Bradley; K F Stock
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Uncovering Sub-Structure and Genomic Profiles in Across-Countries Subpopulations of Angus Cattle.

Authors:  Diercles Francisco Cardoso; Gerardo Alves Fernandes Júnior; Daiane Cristina Becker Scalez; Anderson Antonio Carvalho Alves; Ana Fabrícia Braga Magalhães; Tiago Bresolin; Ricardo Vieira Ventura; Changxi Li; Márcia Cristina de Sena Oliveira; Laercio Ribeiro Porto-Neto; Roberto Carvalheiro; Henrique Nunes de Oliveira; Humberto Tonhati; Lucia Galvão Albuquerque
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Opportunities to Harness High-Throughput and Novel Sensing Phenotypes to Improve Feed Efficiency in Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  Cori J Siberski-Cooper; James E Koltes
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  International single-step SNPBLUP beef cattle evaluations for Limousin weaning weight.

Authors:  Renzo Bonifazi; Mario P L Calus; Jan Ten Napel; Roel F Veerkamp; Alexis Michenet; Simone Savoia; Andrew Cromie; Jérémie Vandenplas
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 5.100

8.  Sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency.

Authors:  Sunduimijid Bolormaa; Iona M MacLeod; Majid Khansefid; Leah C Marett; William J Wales; Filippo Miglior; Christine F Baes; Flavio S Schenkel; Erin E Connor; Coralia I V Manzanilla-Pech; Paul Stothard; Emily Herman; Gert J Nieuwhof; Michael E Goddard; Jennie E Pryce
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 5.100

9.  Genomic correlation: harnessing the benefit of combining two unrelated populations for genomic selection.

Authors:  Laercio R Porto-Neto; William Barendse; John M Henshall; Sean M McWilliam; Sigrid A Lehnert; Antonio Reverter
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Can Cross-Country Genomic Predictions Be a Reasonable Strategy to Support Germplasm Exchange? - A Case Study With Hydrogen Cyanide in Cassava.

Authors:  Lívia Gomes Torres; Eder Jorge de Oliveira; Alex C Ogbonna; Guillaume J Bauchet; Lukas A Mueller; Camila Ferreira Azevedo; Fabyano Fonseca E Silva; Guilherme Ferreira Simiqueli; Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.