| Literature DB >> 22862784 |
Marcelo Takahiro Mitui1, Tga Nilmini Chandrasena, Paul Ks Chan, Shaman Rajindrajith, E Anthony S Nelson, Ting Fan Leung, Akira Nishizono, Kamruddin Ahmed.
Abstract
Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR is now the standard method for typing group A rotaviruses (RVA) to monitor the circulating genotypes in a population. Selection of primers that can accurately type the circulating genotypes is crucial in the context of vaccine introduction and correctly interpreting the impact of vaccination on strain distribution. To our knowledge this study is the first report from Asia of misidentification of genotype G9 as G3 due to a primer-template mismatch. We tested two published G-genotype specific primers sets, designed by Gouvea and colleagues (Set A) and Iturriza-Gomara and colleagues (Set B) on RVA from Hong Kong and Sri Lanka. Among 52 rotaviruses typed as G3 by set A primers, 36 (69.2%) were identified as G9 by nucleotide sequencing and set B primers. Moreover, of 300 rotaviruses tested, 28.3% were untypable by set A primers whereas only 12.3% were untypable by set B primers. Our findings reinforce the need to periodically monitor the primers used for RVA genotyping.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22862784 PMCID: PMC3422167 DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-9-144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virol J ISSN: 1743-422X Impact factor: 4.099
Primer comparison between Gouvea et al. and Iturriza-Gomara et al. Note that primer for G3 and G9 are different
| aBT1 | CAAGTACTCAAATCAATGATGG | G1 | CAAGTACTCAAATCAATGATGG |
| aCT2 | CAATGATATTAACACATTTTCTGTG | G2 | CAATGATATTAACACATTTTCTGTG |
| aET3 | CGTTTGAAGAAGTTGCAAG | G3 | ACGAACTCAACACGAGAG |
| aDT4 | CGTTTCTGGTGAGGAGTTG | G4 | CGTTTCTGGTGAGGGTTG |
| aFT9 | CTAGATGTAACTACAACTC | G9 | CTTGATGTGACTAYAAATAC |
Primers for G1, G2 and G4 in Iturriza-Gomara et al. were adapted from primers of Gouvea et al.
Figure 1Multiple alignments of the VP7 gene sequences of G9 rotaviruses from Hong Kong and Sri Lanka with the corresponding G3 and G9 specific primers proposed by Gouvea et al. and Iturriza-Gómara et al. Dots indicate consensus with the primer