BACKGROUND: Rotaviruses are classified into G- and P-types, which are determined by the reactivity with antibodies to the outer viral proteins, VP7 and VP4, respectively, or sequence variation in the genes encoding these proteins. There are presently a number of different rotavirus strains co-circulating within the UK, with the common human strains G1P[8], G2P[4] and G9P[8] being the most prevalent. As part of strain surveillance for the European Rotavirus Network (EuroRotaNet) a cluster (n=29) of G8 strains was detected in the UK between February and May 2009. OBJECTIVES: G8 strains were initially mistyped as G12 through multiplex RT-PCR, therefore further investigation was performed to ascertain the reasons behind this mistyping. STUDY DESIGN: The genes encoding the VP7 of these G8 strains were sequenced and aligned with the existing G8- and G12-specific oligonucleotide primers. RESULTS: Multiple alignment of sequences derived from these strains and the G8- and G12-specific oligonucleotide primers revealed a series of point mutations which resulted in mismatches at the 3' end of the G8-specific primer binding site that prevented amplification with the G8-specific primer, whilst a close homology with the G12-specific primer allowed mis-priming. Both the G8 and G12 primers were redesigned and their ability to correctly identify G8 and G12 strains was evaluated and confirmed. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the importance of monitoring the specificity and sensitivity of the genotyping methods in order to detect changes in the genotype distribution and changes associated with genetic drift of common or uncommon genotypes. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Rotaviruses are classified into G- and P-types, which are determined by the reactivity with antibodies to the outer viral proteins, VP7 and VP4, respectively, or sequence variation in the genes encoding these proteins. There are presently a number of different rotavirus strains co-circulating within the UK, with the common human strains G1P[8], G2P[4] and G9P[8] being the most prevalent. As part of strain surveillance for the European Rotavirus Network (EuroRotaNet) a cluster (n=29) of G8 strains was detected in the UK between February and May 2009. OBJECTIVES: G8 strains were initially mistyped as G12 through multiplex RT-PCR, therefore further investigation was performed to ascertain the reasons behind this mistyping. STUDY DESIGN: The genes encoding the VP7 of these G8 strains were sequenced and aligned with the existing G8- and G12-specific oligonucleotide primers. RESULTS: Multiple alignment of sequences derived from these strains and the G8- and G12-specific oligonucleotide primers revealed a series of point mutations which resulted in mismatches at the 3' end of the G8-specific primer binding site that prevented amplification with the G8-specific primer, whilst a close homology with the G12-specific primer allowed mis-priming. Both the G8 and G12 primers were redesigned and their ability to correctly identify G8 and G12 strains was evaluated and confirmed. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the importance of monitoring the specificity and sensitivity of the genotyping methods in order to detect changes in the genotype distribution and changes associated with genetic drift of common or uncommon genotypes. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors: Jie Liu; Kate Lurain; Shihab U Sobuz; Sharmin Begum; Happiness Kumburu; Jean Gratz; Gibson Kibiki; Denise Toney; Rashi Gautam; Michael D Bowen; William A Petri; Rashidul Haque; Eric R Houpt Journal: J Virol Methods Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 2.014
Authors: Geoffrey A Weinberg; Daniel C Payne; Elizabeth N Teel; Slavica Mijatovic-Rustempasic; Michael D Bowen; Mary Wikswo; Jon R Gentsch; Umesh D Parashar Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Ran Zhuo; Gillian A M Tarr; Jianling Xie; Stephen B Freedman; Daniel C Payne; Bonita E Lee; Charlotte McWilliams; Linda Chui; Samina Ali; Xiaoli Pang Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2021-08-18 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Mathew D Esona; Rashi Gautam; Ka Ian Tam; Alice Williams; Slavica Mijatovic-Rustempasic; Michael D Bowen Journal: J Virol Methods Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 2.014
Authors: Johan Nordgren; Leon W Nitiema; Sumit Sharma; Djeneba Ouermi; Alfred S Traore; Jacques Simpore; Lennart Svensson Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Yashpal S Malik; Kuldeep Sharma; Nirupama Vaid; Somendu Chakravarti; K M Chandrashekar; Sanjay S Basera; Rashmi Singh; Gaya Prasad; Baldev R Gulati; Kiren N Bhilegaonkar; Awadh B Pandey Journal: J Vet Sci Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 1.672