Literature DB >> 22862738

Cardiac venous left ventricular lead removal and reimplantation following device infection: a large single-center experience.

John Rickard1, Khaldoun Tarakji, Edmond Cronin, Michael P Brunner, Gregory Jackson, Bryan Baranowski, Peter P Borek, David O Martin, Oussama Wazni, Bruce L Wilkoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early series of biventricular device removal have contained mostly younger cardiac venous (CV) left ventricular leads and few have reported on rates of successful reimplantation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients referred to the Cleveland Clinic between February 2, 2001 and July 27, 2011 for removal of a biventricular device with a CV pacing lead for an infectious indication. A total of 173 patients were included. The median age of the CV leads was 22.3 months (interquartile range: 5.2-46.3 months). The complete procedural success rate for all leads was 97.7%, with the remaining 2.3% clinical successes. A total of 76.9% of CV leads were removed using simple traction alone with the remaining leads requiring the use of a laser-powered sheath. A total of 3.5% of leads required intervention (manual dissection or laser-powered dissection) within the coronary sinus (CS). Major complications occurred in 1.2% of patients. Minor complications occurred in 7.5% of patients, the majority of which were hematomas requiring drainage (6.9%). CV lead reimplantation was attempted in 107 patients of which 88 (82.8%) were successful.
CONCLUSION: CV lead removal in patients with an infected biventricular device is associated with an extremely high procedural success rate and a low incidence of major complications. The use of a laser-powered sheath is necessary in roughly one-quarter of cases with a very small percentage requiring intervention within the CS. Reimplantation of CV leads is achievable in roughly 83% of patients, a figure lower than nationally quoted estimates for de novo implantations.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22862738     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02392.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  6 in total

1.  Safety and Effectiveness of Transvenous Lead Extraction in Patients with Infected Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices; Is It More Risky than Extraction of Other Systems?

Authors:  Paweł Stefańczyk; Dorota Nowosielecka; Anna Polewczyk; Łukasz Tułecki; Konrad Tomków; Wojciech Jacheć; Ewa Lewicka; Andrzej Tomaszewski; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  A right subclavian vein approach for interventricular septum puncture and left ventricular endocardial lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Rogelio Robledo-Nolasco; Gerardo De León-Larios; Oziel Gutierrez-Villegas; Elias Zavaleta-Muñiz; David Eduardo Bazzini Carranza; Omar Calixto-Vargas
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2019-02-19

3.  Timing of device reimplantation and reinfection rates following cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Derek Chew; Ranjani Somayaji; John Conly; Derek Exner; Elissa Rennert-May
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Safety and effectiveness of coronary sinus leads extraction - single high-volume centre experience.

Authors:  Andrzej W Kutarski; Wojciech Jacheć; Łukasz Tułecki; Konrad Tomków; Paweł Stefańczyk; Wojciech Borzęcki; Dorota Nowosielecka; Marek Czajkowski; Maciej Polewczyk; Anna Polewczyk
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 1.426

5.  Hybrid transvenous and surgical approach for the extraction of coronary sinus leads: A case series.

Authors:  Ashraf Ahmed; Gianmarco Arabia; Luca Bontempi; Manuel Cerini; Francesca Salghetti; Claudio Muneretto; Gianfranco Mitacchione; Antonino Milidoni; Antonio Curnis
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 6.  Understanding non-response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy: common problems and potential solutions.

Authors:  Benjamin J Sieniewicz; Justin Gould; Bradley Porter; Baldeep S Sidhu; Thomas Teall; Jessica Webb; Gerarld Carr-White; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.214

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.