OBJECTIVE: To identify the format, content, and effects of practice-based small group learning (PBSGL) programs involving FPs. DATA SOURCES: The Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ERIC databases were searched from inception to the second week of November 2011, yielding 99 articles. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were included in the analysis if they described the format or content of or evaluated PBSGL programs among FPs. Thirteen articles were included in the analysis. SYNTHESIS: Two main PBSGL formats exist. The first is self-directed learning, which includes review and discussion of troubling or challenging patient cases. The contents of such programs vary with different teaching styles. The second format targets specific problems from practice to improve certain knowledge or skills or implement new guidelines by using patient cases to stimulate discussion of the selected topic. Both formats are similar in their ultimate goal, equally important, and well accepted by learners and facilitators. Evaluations of learners' perceptions and learning outcomes indicate that PBSGL constitutes a feasible and effective method of professional development. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that PBSGL is a promising method of continuing professional development for FPs. Such programs can be adapted according to learning needs. Future studies that focus on the changes in practice effected by PBSGL will strengthen the evidence for this form of learning and motivate physicians and institutions to adopt it.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the format, content, and effects of practice-based small group learning (PBSGL) programs involving FPs. DATA SOURCES: The Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ERIC databases were searched from inception to the second week of November 2011, yielding 99 articles. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were included in the analysis if they described the format or content of or evaluated PBSGL programs among FPs. Thirteen articles were included in the analysis. SYNTHESIS: Two main PBSGL formats exist. The first is self-directed learning, which includes review and discussion of troubling or challenging patient cases. The contents of such programs vary with different teaching styles. The second format targets specific problems from practice to improve certain knowledge or skills or implement new guidelines by using patient cases to stimulate discussion of the selected topic. Both formats are similar in their ultimate goal, equally important, and well accepted by learners and facilitators. Evaluations of learners' perceptions and learning outcomes indicate that PBSGL constitutes a feasible and effective method of professional development. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that PBSGL is a promising method of continuing professional development for FPs. Such programs can be adapted according to learning needs. Future studies that focus on the changes in practice effected by PBSGL will strengthen the evidence for this form of learning and motivate physicians and institutions to adopt it.
Authors: I John Parboosingh; Virginia A Reed; James Caldwell Palmer; Henry H Bernstein Journal: J Contin Educ Health Prof Date: 2011 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: P Davis; E Andrews; N Donen; A Fitzgerald; S Hughes; A Juby; B Kvern; S Low; O Nixon; A Russell; K Skeith; M Suarez-Almazor Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: M Perry; I Drašković; P Lucassen; M Vernooij-Dassen; T van Achterberg; M Olde Rikkert Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Bhupendrasinh F Chauhan; Maya M Jeyaraman; Amrinder Singh Mann; Justin Lys; Becky Skidmore; Kathryn M Sibley; Ahmed M Abou-Setta; Ryan Zarychanski Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Norbert Král; Bohumil Seifert; Jan Kovář; Cyril Mucha; Jana Vojtíšková; Jáchym Bednár; Seifert Martin Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Date: 2018 Jan-Feb
Authors: Claire A Surr; Cara Gates; Donna Irving; Jan Oyebode; Sarah Jane Smith; Sahdia Parveen; Michelle Drury; Alison Dennison Journal: Rev Educ Res Date: 2017-07-31