Literature DB >> 16424060

DNA methylation alterations in the pancreatic juice of patients with suspected pancreatic disease.

Hiroyuki Matsubayashi1, Marcia Canto, Norihiro Sato, Alison Klein, Tadayoshi Abe, Keishi Yamashita, Charles J Yeo, Anthony Kalloo, Ralph Hruban, Michael Goggins.   

Abstract

Molecular markers of pancreatic neoplasia could aid in the evaluation of visible pancreatic lesions and indicate neoplasia invisible to imaging. We evaluated methylation-specific PCR (MSP) assays that detect aberrantly methylated DNA for their use as markers of pancreatic neoplasia. Methylation analysis was done on pancreatic juice collected endoscopically or surgically from 155 individuals with suspected pancreatic disease: 56 patients had pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, 17 had intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, 26 had symptomatic chronic pancreatitis, 12 controls lacked evidence of pancreatic disease, and 44 were asymptomatic individuals at increased risk of developing familial pancreatic cancer undergoing screening for pancreatic neoplasia. Pancreatic juice DNA was analyzed for promoter methylation using conventional MSP assays for 17 genes. For six genes, pancreatic juice methylation was quantified using real-time quantitative MSP (QMSP; Cyclin D2, FOXE1, NPTX2, ppENK, p16, and TFPI2). Quantifying pancreatic juice methylation using QMSP with a cutoff of >1% methylated DNA could better predict pancreatic cancer than detecting methylation using conventional MSP. In the endoscopic group, 9 of 11 patients with pancreatic cancer, but none of 64 individuals without neoplasia had > or =1% methylation for two or more of the best five QMSP assays (82% sensitivity and 100% specificity; P < 0.0001). The prevalence of pancreatic juice methylation in patients with chronic pancreatitis was less than in patients with pancreatic cancer but higher than in controls and similar to high-risk individuals. The detection and quantification of aberrantly methylated DNA in pancreatic juice is a promising approach to the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16424060     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  86 in total

Review 1.  Review of screening for pancreatic cancer in high risk individuals.

Authors:  Alina Stoita; Ian D Penman; David B Williams
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  The neuronal pentraxin II gene (NPTX2) inhibit proliferation and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro.

Authors:  Ling Zhang; Jun Gao; Lei Li; Zhaoshen Li; Yiqi Du; Yanfang Gong
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 3.  The Triple-Code Model for Pancreatic Cancer: Cross Talk Among Genetics, Epigenetics, and Nuclear Structure.

Authors:  Gwen A Lomberk; Raul Urrutia
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 4.  Identifying molecular markers for the early detection of pancreatic neoplasia.

Authors:  Michael Goggins
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.929

5.  Predicting the Grade of Dysplasia of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms Using Cyst Fluid DNA Methylation Markers.

Authors:  Tatsuo Hata; Marco Dal Molin; Seung-Mo Hong; Koji Tamura; Masaya Suenaga; Jun Yu; Hiraku Sedogawa; Matthew J Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; Anne Marie Lennon; Ralph H Hruban; Michael G Goggins
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Molecular markers of pancreatic cancer: development and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Lucia C Fry; Klaus Mönkemüller; Peter Malfertheiner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 7.  Epigenetic research in cancer epidemiology: trends, opportunities, and challenges.

Authors:  Mukesh Verma; Scott Rogers; Rao L Divi; Sheri D Schully; Stefanie Nelson; L Joseph Su; Sharon A Ross; Susan Pilch; Deborah M Winn; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  DNA methylation alterations in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography brush samples of patients with suspected pancreaticobiliary disease.

Authors:  Mansour A Parsi; Ang Li; Chung-Pin Li; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Aberrant gene methylation in the peritoneal fluid is a risk factor predicting peritoneal recurrence in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masatsugu Hiraki; Yoshihiko Kitajima; Seiji Sato; Jun Nakamura; Kazuyoshi Hashiguchi; Hirokazu Noshiro; Kohji Miyazaki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  CpG island methylation profile of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Norihiro Sato; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Ralph H Hruban; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 7.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.