Literature DB >> 22859259

Resect and discard strategy in clinical practice: a prospective cohort study.

S Paggi1, E Rondonotti, A Amato, V Terruzzi, G Imperiali, G Mandelli, N Terreni, N Lenoci, G Spinzi, F Radaelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Narrow-band imaging (NBI) has shown promising results in discriminating adenomatous from non-adenomatous colonic polyps. In patients with small polyps (< 10  mm), the application of NBI within a "resect and discard" strategy, might allow post-polypectomy surveillance intervals to be determined independently from histopathology. The aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility and safety of this approach in routine clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive colonoscopy outpatients with one or more polyps smaller than 10  mm were prospectively included. Each polyp was categorized by the endoscopist as adenoma or non-adenoma according to simplified NBI criteria, and future post-polypectomy surveillance interval was assigned accordingly. Following histopathology, post-polypectomy surveillance interval was subsequently re-assigned, and the accordance between endoscopy- and histology-directed surveillance strategies was calculated.
RESULTS: Among 942 colonoscopy patients, 286 (30.4 %) with only small polyps were included. In total, 511 small polyps were evaluated; 350 (68.5 %) were adenomas and 18 of these (5.1 %) had histologic features of advanced neoplasia. For the in vivo diagnosis of adenoma, NBI sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were 94.9 %, 65.8 %, 85.7 %, 2.80, and 0.08, respectively. The endoscopy-directed surveillance strategy was in accordance with the histology-directed strategy in 237 of 286 patients (82.9 %). In 9.8 % and 7.3 % patients, the endoscopy-directed approach would have resulted in early and delayed surveillance, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The resect and discard strategy seems to be a viable, safe, and cost-effective approach for the management of patients with small polyps. However, caution in the application of the strategy should be advocated for patients with polyps 6 - 9  mm in size and those with right-sided lesions, due to their malignant potential. The study was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01462123). © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22859259     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1309891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  19 in total

1.  Management and risk factors for incomplete resection associated with jumbo forceps polypectomy for diminutive colorectal polyps: a single-institution retrospective study.

Authors:  Naoki Asayama; Shinji Nagata; Kenjiro Shigita; Yutaro Ogawa; Hirosato Tamari; Taiki Aoyama; Akira Fukumoto; Shinichi Mukai; Mayumi Kaneko
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The Resect-and-Discard Strategy for Management of Small and Diminutive Colonic Polyps.

Authors:  Franco Radaelli
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-05

Review 3.  Colonic polyps: is it useful to characterize them with advanced endoscopy?

Authors:  Maria Lopez-Ceron; Erwin Sanabria; Maria Pellise
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  [Remove polyps and discard. Way or wrong way?].

Authors:  A Tannapfel; D Aust; G B Baretton; H Bläker; I Esposito; C Langner; M Vieth; E Wardelmann; Th Kirchner; P Schirmacher
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 5.  Rationale for and clinical benefits of colonoscopy with narrow band imaging: pathological prediction and colorectal screening.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Aihara; Shoichi Saito; Hisao Tajiri
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Comparative efficacy of cold polypectomy techniques for diminutive colorectal polyps: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yoon Suk Jung; Chan Hyuk Park; Eunwoo Nam; Chang Soo Eun; Dong Il Park; Dong Soo Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Colonic lesion characterisation skills among UK endoscopists and the impact of a brief training intervention.

Authors:  P Basford; G Longcroft-Wheaton; Reiji Higashi; Toshio Uraoka; P Bhandari
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-31

8.  Self-Formation Assessed by Cumulative Summation Test Does Not Reach Recommended Thresholds for Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps ≤ 7 mm.

Authors:  Francisco Javier García-Alonso; Isabel Manzano Santamaría; Antonio Guardiola Arévalo; Rubén Pique Becerra; Amanda Leandro Barros; Noelia de Sande Rivera; Guillermo Moreno Casas; Silvia Arribas Terradillos; Álvaro Llerena Riofrío; Cristian Aitor Escolano Peco; Emma Alguacil Rodríguez; Fernando Bermejo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  The role of narrow band imaging in colorectal polyp detection.

Authors:  Irina Ioana Vișovan; Marcel Tanțău; Oliviu Pascu; Lidia Ciobanu; Alina Tanțău
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 10.  Endoscopic mucosal imaging of gastrointestinal neoplasia in 2013.

Authors:  P Urquhart; R DaCosta; N Marcon
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.