Literature DB >> 23771504

Endoscopic mucosal imaging of gastrointestinal neoplasia in 2013.

P Urquhart1, R DaCosta, N Marcon.   

Abstract

The holy grail of gastrointestinal endoscopy consists of the detection, in vivo characterization, and endoscopic removal of early or premalignant mucosal lesions. While our ability to achieve this goal has improved substantially since the development of the modern video-endoscope, inadequate visual inspection, errors of interpretation, and lesion subtlety all contribute to the continued suboptimal detection and assessment of early neoplasia. A myriad of new technologies has thus emerged that may help resolve these shortcomings; high magnification endoscopes, as well as the techniques of dye-based and virtual chromoendoscopy, are now widely available, while confocal laser endomicroscopy and endocystoscopy, optical coherence tomography, and autofluorescence imaging are generally applicable only in a research setting. Such technologies can be broadly categorized according to whether they potentially afford endoscopists improved detection, or real-time characterization, of mucosal lesions. Enhanced detection of otherwise "invisible" lesions, such as a flat area of intramucosal adenocarcinoma within Barrett's esophagus, carries the potential of an endoscopic cure prior to the development into a more advanced or metastatic disease. The ability to characterize a lesion to achieve an in vivo diagnosis, such as a colonic polyp, potentially affords endoscopists the ability to decide which lesions require removal and which can be safely left behind or discarded without histological assessment. Furthermore targeted biopsies, such as in the surveillance of chronic colitis, may prove to be more accurate and efficacious than the current protocol of random biopsies. An important caveat in the discussion of developing technologies in early cancer detection is the fundamental importance of a health-care system that promotes screening programs to recruit at-risk individuals. The ideal tool to optimize the use of endoscopy in population screening would be a panel of reliable biomarkers (blood, stool, or urine) that could effectively select a high-risk group, thus reducing the indiscriminate use of an expensive technology. The following review summarizes the current endoscopic imaging techniques available, and in development, for the early identification of gastrointestinal neoplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23771504     DOI: 10.1007/s11894-013-0330-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep        ISSN: 1522-8037


  110 in total

1.  Computer-based classification of small colorectal polyps by using narrow-band imaging with optical magnification.

Authors:  Sebastian Gross; Christian Trautwein; Alexander Behrens; Ron Winograd; Stephan Palm; Holger H Lutz; Ramin Schirin-Sokhan; Hartmut Hecker; Til Aach; Jens J W Tischendorf
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of confocal laser endomicroscopy in diagnosing dysplasia in patients affected by long-standing ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Antonio Rispo; Fabiana Castiglione; Stefania Staibano; Dario Esposito; Francesco Maione; Maria Siano; Francesca Salvatori; Stefania Masone; Marcello Persico; Giovanni Domenico De Palma
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-09-16

3.  Accuracy of in vivo optical diagnosis of colon polyp histology by narrow-band imaging in predicting colonoscopy surveillance intervals.

Authors:  Neil Gupta; Ajay Bansal; Deepthi Rao; Dayna S Early; Sreenivasa Jonnalagadda; Steven A Edmundowicz; Prateek Sharma; Amit Rastogi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Real-time increased detection of neoplastic tissue in Barrett's esophagus with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: final results of an international multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Prateek Sharma; Alexander R Meining; Emmanuel Coron; Charles J Lightdale; Herbert C Wolfsen; Ajay Bansal; Monther Bajbouj; Jean-Paul Galmiche; Julian A Abrams; Amit Rastogi; Neil Gupta; Joel E Michalek; Gregory Y Lauwers; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Confocal laser endomicroscopy for in vivo diagnosis of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Zhen Li; Tao Yu; Xiu-Li Zuo; Xiao-Meng Gu; Cheng-Jun Zhou; Rui Ji; Chang-Qing Li; Peng Wang; Ting-Guo Zhang; Khek-Yu Ho; Yan-Qing Li
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Acetic acid spray is an effective tool for the endoscopic detection of neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton; Moses Duku; Robert Mead; David Poller; Pradeep Bhandari
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 7.  Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Aleksandar Nagorni; Goran Bjelakovic; Bratislav Petrovic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-01-18

8.  Leaving distal colorectal hyperplastic polyps in place can be achieved with high accuracy by using narrow-band imaging: an observational study.

Authors:  David G Hewett; Melanie E Huffman; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Diagnostic performance of light-induced fluorescence endoscopy for gastric neoplasms.

Authors:  A Ohkawa; H Miwa; A Namihisa; O Kobayashi; N Nakaniwa; T Ohkusa; T Ogihara; N Sato
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.

Authors:  J E East; M Stavrindis; S Thomas-Gibson; T Guenther; P P Tekkis; B P Saunders
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 8.171

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Molecular markers and imaging tools to identify malignant potential in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Michael Bennett; Hiroshi Mashimo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2014-11-15

2.  Fiberoptic endoscopy: the singular transformative event of our time.

Authors:  C Mel Wilcox
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  A Clinical Wide-Field Fluorescence Endoscopic Device for Molecular Imaging Demonstrating Cathepsin Protease Activity in Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Steven Sensarn; Cristina L Zavaleta; Ehud Segal; Stephan Rogalla; Wansik Lee; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Matthew Bogyo; Christopher H Contag
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  Endoscopic Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus with Low-Grade Dysplasia.

Authors:  Francesco Maione; Alessia Chini; Rosa Maione; Michele Manigrasso; Alessandra Marello; Gianluca Cassese; Nicola Gennarelli; Marco Milone; Giovanni Domenico De Palma
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23

5.  Surveillance in Barrett esophagus.

Authors:  C Gindea; R Birla; P Hoara; A Caragui; S Constantinoiu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2014

Review 6.  Advanced imaging technologies for the detection of dysplasia and early cancer in barrett esophagus.

Authors:  Alberto Espino; Maria Cirocco; Ralph Dacosta; Norman Marcon
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-01-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.