PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to document the ability of single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray to identify copy-neutral regions of homozygosity, demonstrate clinical utility of regions of homozygosity, and discuss ethical/legal implications when regions of homozygosity are associated with a parental blood relationship. METHODS: Study data were compiled from consecutive samples sent to our clinical laboratory over a 3-year period. A cytogenetics database identified patients with at least two regions of homozygosity >10 Mb on two separate chromosomes. A chart review was conducted on patients who met the criteria. RESULTS: Of 3,217 single-nucleotide polymorphism microarrays, 59 (1.8%) patients met inclusion criteria. The percentage of homozygosity ranged from 0.9 to 30.1%, indicating parental relationships from distant to first-degree relatives. First-degree kinship was suspected in the parents of at least 11 patients with regions of homozygosity covering >21.3% of their autosome. In four patients from two families, homozygosity mapping discovered a candidate gene that was sequenced to identify a clinically significant mutation. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates clinical utility in the identification of regions of homozygosity, as these regions may aid in diagnosis of the patient. This study establishes the need for careful reporting, thorough pretest counseling, and careful electronic documentation, as microarray has the capability of detecting previously unknown/unreported relationships.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to document the ability of single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray to identify copy-neutral regions of homozygosity, demonstrate clinical utility of regions of homozygosity, and discuss ethical/legal implications when regions of homozygosity are associated with a parental blood relationship. METHODS: Study data were compiled from consecutive samples sent to our clinical laboratory over a 3-year period. A cytogenetics database identified patients with at least two regions of homozygosity >10 Mb on two separate chromosomes. A chart review was conducted on patients who met the criteria. RESULTS: Of 3,217 single-nucleotide polymorphism microarrays, 59 (1.8%) patients met inclusion criteria. The percentage of homozygosity ranged from 0.9 to 30.1%, indicating parental relationships from distant to first-degree relatives. First-degree kinship was suspected in the parents of at least 11 patients with regions of homozygosity covering >21.3% of their autosome. In four patients from two families, homozygosity mapping discovered a candidate gene that was sequenced to identify a clinically significant mutation. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates clinical utility in the identification of regions of homozygosity, as these regions may aid in diagnosis of the patient. This study establishes the need for careful reporting, thorough pretest counseling, and careful electronic documentation, as microarray has the capability of detecting previously unknown/unreported relationships.
Authors: Laura P Chen; Anita E Beck; Karen D Tsuchiya; Penny M Chow; Ghayda M Mirzaa; Rebecca T Wiester; Kenneth W Feldman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Christiaan de Bruin; Verónica Mericq; Shayne F Andrew; Hermine A van Duyvenvoorde; Nicole S Verkaik; Monique Losekoot; Aleksey Porollo; Hernán Garcia; Yi Kuang; Dan Hanson; Peter Clayton; Dik C van Gent; Jan M Wit; Vivian Hwa; Andrew Dauber Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Jia-Chi Wang; Leslie Ross; Loretta W Mahon; Renius Owen; Morteza Hemmat; Boris T Wang; Mohammed El Naggar; Kimberly A Kopita; Linda M Randolph; John M Chase; Maria J Matas Aguilera; Juan López Siles; Joseph A Church; Natalie Hauser; Joseph J Shen; Marilyn C Jones; Klaas J Wierenga; Zhijie Jiang; Mary Haddadin; Fatih Z Boyar; Arturo Anguiano; Charles M Strom; Trilochan Sahoo Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Trilochan Sahoo; Jia-Chi Wang; Mohamed M Elnaggar; Pedro Sanchez-Lara; Leslie P Ross; Loretta W Mahon; Katayoun Hafezi; Abigail Deming; Lynne Hinman; Yovana Bruno; James A Bartley; Thomas Liehr; Arturo Anguiano; Marilyn Jones Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Sander Pajusalu; Olga Žilina; Maria Yakoreva; Pille Tammur; Kati Kuuse; Triin Mölter-Väär; Margit Nõukas; Tiia Reimand; Katrin Õunap Journal: Mol Syndromol Date: 2015-08-15
Authors: Samuel D Quaynor; Earl W Stradtman; Hyung-Goo Kim; Yiping Shen; Lynn P Chorich; Derek A Schreihofer; Lawrence C Layman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Francisco C Ceballos; Peter K Joshi; David W Clark; Michèle Ramsay; James F Wilson Journal: Nat Rev Genet Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 53.242
Authors: Fernanda Delgado; Holly K Tabor; Penny M Chow; Jessie H Conta; Kenneth W Feldman; Karen D Tsuchiya; Anita E Beck Journal: Genet Med Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 8.822