BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic airway inflammation is heterogeneous in asthmatic patients. We recently described a distinct subtype of asthma defined by the expression of genes inducible by T(H)2 cytokines in bronchial epithelium. This gene signature, which includes periostin, is present in approximately half of asthmatic patients and correlates with eosinophilic airway inflammation. However, identification of this subtype depends on invasive airway sampling, and hence noninvasive biomarkers of this phenotype are desirable. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify systemic biomarkers of eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthmatic patients. METHODS: We measured fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (Feno), peripheral blood eosinophil, periostin, YKL-40, and IgE levels and compared these biomarkers with airway eosinophilia in asthmatic patients. RESULTS: We collected sputum, performed bronchoscopy, and matched peripheral blood samples from 67 asthmatic patients who remained symptomatic despite maximal inhaled corticosteroid treatment (mean FEV(1), 60% of predicted value; mean Asthma Control Questionnaire [ACQ] score, 2.7). Serum periostin levels are significantly increased in asthmatic patients with evidence of eosinophilic airway inflammation relative to those with minimal eosinophilic airway inflammation. A logistic regression model, including sex, age, body mass index, IgE levels, blood eosinophil numbers, Feno levels, and serum periostin levels, in 59 patients with severe asthma showed that, of these indices, the serum periostin level was the single best predictor of airway eosinophilia (P = .007). CONCLUSION: Periostin is a systemic biomarker of airway eosinophilia in asthmatic patients and has potential utility in patient selection for emerging asthma therapeutics targeting T(H)2 inflammation.
BACKGROUND:Eosinophilic airway inflammation is heterogeneous in asthmatic patients. We recently described a distinct subtype of asthma defined by the expression of genes inducible by T(H)2 cytokines in bronchial epithelium. This gene signature, which includes periostin, is present in approximately half of asthmatic patients and correlates with eosinophilic airway inflammation. However, identification of this subtype depends on invasive airway sampling, and hence noninvasive biomarkers of this phenotype are desirable. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify systemic biomarkers of eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthmatic patients. METHODS: We measured fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (Feno), peripheral blood eosinophil, periostin, YKL-40, and IgE levels and compared these biomarkers with airway eosinophilia in asthmatic patients. RESULTS: We collected sputum, performed bronchoscopy, and matched peripheral blood samples from 67 asthmatic patients who remained symptomatic despite maximal inhaled corticosteroid treatment (mean FEV(1), 60% of predicted value; mean Asthma Control Questionnaire [ACQ] score, 2.7). Serum periostin levels are significantly increased in asthmatic patients with evidence of eosinophilic airway inflammation relative to those with minimal eosinophilic airway inflammation. A logistic regression model, including sex, age, body mass index, IgE levels, blood eosinophil numbers, Feno levels, and serum periostin levels, in 59 patients with severe asthma showed that, of these indices, the serum periostin level was the single best predictor of airway eosinophilia (P = .007). CONCLUSION:Periostin is a systemic biomarker of airway eosinophilia in asthmatic patients and has potential utility in patient selection for emerging asthma therapeutics targeting T(H)2 inflammation.
Authors: Prescott G Woodruff; Barmak Modrek; David F Choy; Guiquan Jia; Alexander R Abbas; Almut Ellwanger; Laura L Koth; Joseph R Arron; John V Fahy Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-05-29 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: M Humbert; S R Durham; P Kimmitt; N Powell; B Assoufi; R Pfister; G Menz; A B Kay; C J Corrigan Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Hidefumi Sasaki; Chih-Yi Yu; Meiru Dai; Carmen Tam; Massimo Loda; Daniel Auclair; Lan Bo Chen; Anthony Elias Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Ian D Pavord; Peter K Jeffery; Yusheng Qiu; Jie Zhu; Debbie Parker; Asa Carlsheimer; Ian Naya; Neil C Barnes Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2009-04-14 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Tao Huang; Meredith Hazen; Yonglei Shang; Meijuan Zhou; Xiumin Wu; Donghong Yan; Zhonghua Lin; Margaret Solon; Elizabeth Luis; Hai Ngu; Yongchang Shi; Arna Katewa; David F Choy; Nandhini Ramamoorthi; Erick R Castellanos; Mercedesz Balazs; Min Xu; Wyne P Lee; Marissa L Matsumoto; Jian Payandeh; Joseph R Arron; Jo-Anne Hongo; Jianyong Wang; Isidro Hötzel; Cary D Austin; Karin Reif Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2016-05-19
Authors: E S Dellon; L L Higgins; R Beitia; S Rusin; J T Woosley; R Veerappan; S R Selitsky; J S Parker; R M Genta; R H Lash; R Aranda; R J Peach; M Grimm Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 8.171