OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to investigate the detection of non-eosinophilic asthma using induced sputum. Although this is an important subtype of clinical asthma, its recognition is not standardized. METHODS: Adult non-smokers with asthma and healthy controls underwent sputum induction and hypertonic saline challenge. Non-eosinophilic asthma was defined as symptomatic asthma with normal sputum eosinophil counts. The normal range for sputum eosinophil count was determined using the 95th percentile from the healthy control group as a cut-off point. RESULTS: The recognition of non-eosinophilic asthma using eosinophil proportion was in agreement with a definition based on absolute eosinophil count (kappa 0.67). Non-eosinophilic asthma was a stable subtype over both the short term (4 weeks) and longer term (5 years, kappa 0.77). Airway inflammation in asthma could be categorized into four inflammatory subtypes based on sputum eosinophil and neutrophil proportions. These subtypes were neutrophilic asthma, eosinophilic asthma, mixed granulocytic asthma and paucigranulocytic asthma. Subjects with increased neutrophils (neutrophilic asthma and mixed granulocytic asthma) were older and had an increased total cell count and cell viability compared with other subtypes. CONCLUSION: Induced sputum eosinophil proportion is a good discriminator for eosinophilic asthma, providing a reproducible definition of a homogenous group. The remaining non-eosinophilic subjects are heterogeneous and can be further classified based on the presence of neutrophils. These inflammatory subtypes have important implications for the investigation and characterization of airway inflammation in asthma.
OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to investigate the detection of non-eosinophilic asthma using induced sputum. Although this is an important subtype of clinical asthma, its recognition is not standardized. METHODS: Adult non-smokers with asthma and healthy controls underwent sputum induction and hypertonic saline challenge. Non-eosinophilic asthma was defined as symptomatic asthma with normal sputum eosinophil counts. The normal range for sputum eosinophil count was determined using the 95th percentile from the healthy control group as a cut-off point. RESULTS: The recognition of non-eosinophilic asthma using eosinophil proportion was in agreement with a definition based on absolute eosinophil count (kappa 0.67). Non-eosinophilic asthma was a stable subtype over both the short term (4 weeks) and longer term (5 years, kappa 0.77). Airway inflammation in asthma could be categorized into four inflammatory subtypes based on sputum eosinophil and neutrophil proportions. These subtypes were neutrophilic asthma, eosinophilic asthma, mixed granulocytic asthma and paucigranulocytic asthma. Subjects with increased neutrophils (neutrophilic asthma and mixed granulocytic asthma) were older and had an increased total cell count and cell viability compared with other subtypes. CONCLUSION: Induced sputum eosinophil proportion is a good discriminator for eosinophilic asthma, providing a reproducible definition of a homogenous group. The remaining non-eosinophilic subjects are heterogeneous and can be further classified based on the presence of neutrophils. These inflammatory subtypes have important implications for the investigation and characterization of airway inflammation in asthma.
Authors: David F Choy; Barmak Modrek; Alexander R Abbas; Sarah Kummerfeld; Hilary F Clark; Lawren C Wu; Grazyna Fedorowicz; Zora Modrusan; John V Fahy; Prescott G Woodruff; Joseph R Arron Journal: J Immunol Date: 2010-12-27 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Prescott G Woodruff; Barmak Modrek; David F Choy; Guiquan Jia; Alexander R Abbas; Almut Ellwanger; Laura L Koth; Joseph R Arron; John V Fahy Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-05-29 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Elizabeth A Platz; Charles G Drake; Kathryn M Wilson; Siobhan Sutcliffe; Stacey A Kenfield; Lorelei A Mucci; Meir J Stampfer; Walter C Willett; Carlos A Camargo; Edward Giovannucci Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Tao Huang; Meredith Hazen; Yonglei Shang; Meijuan Zhou; Xiumin Wu; Donghong Yan; Zhonghua Lin; Margaret Solon; Elizabeth Luis; Hai Ngu; Yongchang Shi; Arna Katewa; David F Choy; Nandhini Ramamoorthi; Erick R Castellanos; Mercedesz Balazs; Min Xu; Wyne P Lee; Marissa L Matsumoto; Jian Payandeh; Joseph R Arron; Jo-Anne Hongo; Jianyong Wang; Isidro Hötzel; Cary D Austin; Karin Reif Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2016-05-19
Authors: Kavita Pal; Xin Feng; John W Steinke; Marie D Burdick; Yun M Shim; Sun-Sang Sung; W Gerald Teague; Larry Borish Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 6.914