Literature DB >> 22857818

Your mind wanders weakly, your mind wanders deeply: objective measures reveal mindless reading at different levels.

Daniel J Schad1, Antje Nuthmann, Ralf Engbert.   

Abstract

When the mind wanders, attention turns away from the external environment and cognitive processing is decoupled from perceptual information. Mind wandering is usually treated as a dichotomy (dichotomy-hypothesis), and is often measured using self-reports. Here, we propose the levels of inattention hypothesis, which postulates attentional decoupling to graded degrees at different hierarchical levels of cognitive processing. To measure graded levels of attentional decoupling during reading we introduce the sustained attention to stimulus task (SAST), which is based on psychophysics of error detection. Under experimental conditions likely to induce mind wandering, we found that subjects were less likely to notice errors that required high-level processing for their detection as opposed to errors that only required low-level processing. Eye tracking revealed that before errors were overlooked influences of high- and low-level linguistic variables on eye fixations were reduced in a graded fashion, indicating episodes of mindless reading at weak and deep levels. Individual fixation durations predicted overlooking of lexical errors 5s before they occurred. Our findings support the levels of inattention hypothesis and suggest that different levels of mindless reading can be measured behaviorally in the SAST. Using eye tracking to detect mind wandering online represents a promising approach for the development of new techniques to study mind wandering and to ameliorate its negative consequences.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22857818     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  24 in total

1.  When the brain takes a break: a model-based analysis of mind wandering.

Authors:  Matthias Mittner; Wouter Boekel; Adrienne M Tucker; Brandon M Turner; Andrew Heathcote; Birte U Forstmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Reading during the composition of multi-sentence texts: an eye-movement study.

Authors:  Mark Torrance; Roger Johansson; Victoria Johansson; Åsa Wengelin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-29

3.  Migraine and attention to visual events during mind wandering.

Authors:  Julia W Y Kam; Marla J S Mickleborough; Chelsea Eades; Todd C Handy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Scene meaningfulness guides eye movements even during mind-wandering.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Nicola C Anderson; Kevin F Miller
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Mind-wandering Is Accompanied by Both Local Sleep and Enhanced Processes of Spatial Attention Allocation.

Authors:  Christian Wienke; Mandy V Bartsch; Lena Vogelgesang; Christoph Reichert; Hermann Hinrichs; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Stefan Dürschmid
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-01-15

6.  Do your eyes give you away? A validation study of eye-movement measures used as indicators for mindless reading.

Authors:  Lena Steindorf; Jan Rummel
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-02

7.  Detection of mind wandering using EEG: Within and across individuals.

Authors:  Henry W Dong; Caitlin Mills; Robert T Knight; Julia W Y Kam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  A Neurophysiological and Neuropsychological Consideration of Mindful Movement: Clinical and Research Implications.

Authors:  Tamara Anne Russell; Silvia Maria Arcuri
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Sharp Wave Ripples during Visual Exploration in the Primate Hippocampus.

Authors:  Timothy K Leonard; Jonathan M Mikkila; Emad N Eskandar; Jason L Gerrard; Daniel Kaping; Shaun R Patel; Thilo Womelsdorf; Kari L Hoffman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Differential effects of wakeful rest, music and video game playing on working memory performance in the n-back task.

Authors:  Maxim S Kuschpel; Shuyan Liu; Daniel J Schad; Stephan Heinzel; Andreas Heinz; Michael A Rapp
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.