Literature DB >> 2285765

Gender differences in facial reactions to facial expressions.

U Dimberg1, L O Lundquist.   

Abstract

This study explored whether males and females differ in facial muscle reactivity when exposed to facial expressions. The study also examined whether the sex of the stimulus faces differentially influences the response patterns to facial stimuli. Thus, the sex was manipulated in a 2 x 2 factorial design by exposing males and females to slides of angry and happy faces displayed by both sexes. Facial electromyographic (EMG) activity was measured from the corrugator and zygomatic muscle regions. The subjects were also required to rate the stimuli on different dimensions. The results showed that angry faces evoked increased corrugator activity whereas happy faces evoked increased zygomatic activity. As predicted, these effects were more pronounced for females, particularly for the response to happy faces. Interestingly, there were no facial EMG effects for gender of stimulus. It was further found that males and females perceived the stimuli similarly. The results are consistent with previous findings indicating that females are more facially reactive than are males.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2285765     DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(90)90024-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  42 in total

1.  Fairness modulates non-conscious facial mimicry in women.

Authors:  Dennis Hofman; Peter A Bos; Dennis J L G Schutter; Jack van Honk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Alcohol and Emotional Contagion: An Examination of the Spreading of Smiles in Male and Female Drinking Groups.

Authors:  Catharine E Fairbairn; Michael A Sayette; Odd O Aalen; Arnoldo Frigessi
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-09-26

3.  Do Dynamic Compared to Static Facial Expressions of Happiness and Anger Reveal Enhanced Facial Mimicry?

Authors:  Krystyna Rymarczyk; Łukasz Żurawski; Kamila Jankowiak-Siuda; Iwona Szatkowska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Sex, gender, and pain: women and men really are different.

Authors:  R B Fillingim
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

5.  Reappraising the voices of wrath.

Authors:  Sebastian Korb; Sascha Frühholz; Didier Grandjean
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Empathy: gender effects in brain and behavior.

Authors:  Leonardo Christov-Moore; Elizabeth A Simpson; Gino Coudé; Kristina Grigaityte; Marco Iacoboni; Pier Francesco Ferrari
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Hemispheric Lateralization of Resting-State Functional Connectivity of the Anterior Insula: Association with Age, Gender, and a Novelty-Seeking Trait.

Authors:  Sarah Kann; Sheng Zhang; Peter Manza; Hoi-Chung Leung; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2016-09-30

8.  Uncrossed cortico-muscular projections in humans are abundant to facial muscles of the upper and lower face, but may differ between sexes.

Authors:  Urs Fischer; Christian W Hess; Kai M Rösler
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Sex differences in the response to emotional distraction: an event-related fMRI investigation.

Authors:  Alexandru D Iordan; Sanda Dolcos; Ekaterina Denkova; Florin Dolcos
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  An Effective Neurofeedback Intervention to Improve Social Interactions in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Elisabeth V C Friedrich; Aparajithan Sivanathan; Theodore Lim; Neil Suttie; Sandy Louchart; Steven Pillen; Jaime A Pineda
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.