Literature DB >> 22857273

Clinically relevant test methods to establish in vitro equivalence for spacers and valved holding chambers used with pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs).

Jolyon Mitchell1, Myrna B Dolovich.   

Abstract

Regulatory guidance in Canada and Europe recommends that the manufacturer of an inhaled drug product delivered by pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) identify a spacer (S) or valved holding chamber (VHC) to be used with their designated product. It therefore becomes necessary to include the S/VHC in the process of establishing bioequivalence (BE) to the reference pMDI product for both new-entry generic and subsequent market entry products (SMEPs). S/VHCs substantially modify the aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) of the inhaled medication, and potentially the spatial distribution of the mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient(s) [API(s)] depositing in the respiratory tract. The processes whereby S/VHCs can influence BE outcomes are examined, and the inadequacy of compendial in vitro methods to provide pertinent information to assess BE for the pMDI+VHC combination is highlighted. A three-part strategy is proposed whereby in vitro testing for BE can simulate more clinically-relevant conditions than in the current compendial procedures: 1. The inclusion of a short delay between inhaler actuation and sampling onset is appropriate when determining APSD at flow rate(s) suitable for the intended patient population; 2. Assessment of total emitted mass ex S/VHC by simulating tidal breathing pattern(s) appropriate for intended use; 3. Incorporation of appropriate face model(s), representative of the intended patient age range(s), into test procedures for S/VHCs with facemask, enabling clinically-appropriate dead space and fit-to-face to be simulated. Although the compendial authorities have been slow to recognize the need for such in vitro testing, a Canadian standard provides direction for implementing most proposals, which should result in better performance predictions and more appropriate clinical outcomes, highlighting similarities and differences between reference and test products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22857273     DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2011.0933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv        ISSN: 1941-2711            Impact factor:   2.849


  6 in total

Review 1.  In Vitro Testing for Orally Inhaled Products: Developments in Science-Based Regulatory Approaches.

Authors:  Ben Forbes; Per Bäckman; David Christopher; Myrna Dolovich; Bing V Li; Beth Morgan
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Developing ways to evaluate in the laboratory how inhalation devices will be used by patients and care-givers: the need for clinically appropriate testing.

Authors:  Jolyon P Mitchell; Jason A Suggett
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  More Realistic Face Model Surface Improves Relevance of Pediatric In-Vitro Aerosol Studies.

Authors:  Israel Amirav; Asaf Halamish; Miguel Gorenberg; Hamza Omar; Michael T Newhouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comment on "Optimizing the Delivery of Inhaled Medication for Respiratory Patients: The Role of Valved Holding Chambers".

Authors:  Michael T Newhouse; Israel Amirav
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 2.409

5.  Valved holding chamber drug delivery is dependent on breathing pattern and device design.

Authors:  Péter Csonka; Lauri Lehtimäki
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2019-02-04

Review 6.  A review of the in vitro and in vivo valved holding chamber (VHC) literature with a focus on the AeroChamber Plus Flow-Vu Anti-static VHC.

Authors:  Sanjeeva Dissanayake; Jason Suggett
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.