Literature DB >> 24889732

Developing ways to evaluate in the laboratory how inhalation devices will be used by patients and care-givers: the need for clinically appropriate testing.

Jolyon P Mitchell1, Jason A Suggett.   

Abstract

The design of methods in the pharmaceutical compendia for the laboratory-based evaluation of orally inhaled product (OIP) performance is intentionally aimed for simplicity and robustness in order to achieve the high degree of accuracy and precision required for the assurance of product quality in a regulated environment. Consequently, performance of the inhaler when used or even misused by the patient or care-giver has often not been assessed. Indeed, patient-use-based methodology has been developed in a somewhat piecemeal basis when a need has been perceived by the developing organization. There is, therefore, a lack of in-use test standardization across OIP platforms, and often important details have remained undisclosed beyond the sponsoring organization. The advent of international standards, such as ISO 20072:2009, that focus specifically on the OIP development process, together with the need to make these drug delivery devices more patient-friendly as an aid to improving compliance, is necessitating that clinically appropriate test procedures be standardized at the OIP class level. It is also important that their capabilities and limitations are well understood by stakeholders involved in the process. This article outlines how this process might take place, drawing on current examples in which significant advances in methodology have been achieved. Ideally, it is hoped that such procedures, once appropriately validated, might eventually become incorporated into the pharmacopeial literature as a resource for future inhaler developers, regulatory agencies, and clinicians seeking to understand how these devices will perform in use to augment ongoing product quality testing which is adequately served by existing methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24889732      PMCID: PMC4179663          DOI: 10.1208/s12249-014-0145-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech        ISSN: 1530-9932            Impact factor:   3.246


  52 in total

Review 1.  Consensus statement: aerosols and delivery devices. American Association for Respiratory Care.

Authors:  M A Dolovich; N R MacIntyre; P J Anderson; C A Camargo; N Chew; C H Cole; R Dhand; J B Fink; N J Gross; D R Hess; A J Hickey; C S Kim; T B Martonen; D J Pierson; B K Rubin; G C Smaldone
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.258

2.  European Respiratory Society Guidelines on the use of nebulizers.

Authors:  J Boe; J H Dennis; B R O'Driscoll; T T Bauer; M Carone; B Dautzenberg; P Diot; K Heslop; L Lannefors
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  Impact of oropharyngeal deposition on inhaled dose.

Authors:  M Dolovich; R Rhem
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  1998

Review 4.  Improved laboratory test methods for orally inhaled products.

Authors:  Jolyon P Mitchell; Mark W Nagel
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2013-08

5.  Improving the odds that patients and caregivers will use inhalers correctly: a manufacturer's response.

Authors:  Jolyon P Mitchell
Journal:  Prim Care Respir J       Date:  2011-06

6.  Face mask physiotherapy in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  J C Tyrrell; E J Hiller; J Martin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  The Sophia Anatomical Infant Nose-Throat (Saint) model: a valuable tool to study aerosol deposition in infants.

Authors:  H M Janssens; J C de Jongste; W J Fokkens; S G Robben; K Wouters; H A Tiddens
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2001

8.  In vitro, ex vivo, in vivo veritas.

Authors:  L Borgström
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 13.146

9.  Beclomethasone dipropionate 250 µg per dose metered dose inhalers: effect of Volumatic spacer on potentially respirable dose.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  1997-11-28       Impact factor: 5.875

10.  Novel system to investigate the effects of inhaled volume and rates of rise in simulated inspiratory air flow on fine particle output from a dry powder inhaler.

Authors:  Varsha Chavan; Richard Dalby
Journal:  AAPS PharmSci       Date:  2002
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Bridging the Gap Between Science and Clinical Efficacy: Physiology, Imaging, and Modeling of Aerosols in the Lung.

Authors:  Chantal Darquenne; John S Fleming; Ira Katz; Andrew R Martin; Jeffry Schroeter; Omar S Usmani; Jose Venegas; Otmar Schmid
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.849

2.  Preclinical Development of Orally Inhaled Drugs (OIDs)-Are Animal Models Predictive or Shall We Move Towards In Vitro Non-Animal Models?

Authors:  Dania Movia; Adriele Prina-Mello
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Multivariate Analysis of Effects of Asthmatic Patient Respiratory Profiles on the In Vitro Performance of a Reservoir Multidose and a Capsule-Based Dry Powder Inhaler.

Authors:  Francesca Buttini; Irene Pasquali; Gaetano Brambilla; Diego Copelli; Massimiliano Dagli Alberi; Anna Giulia Balducci; Ruggero Bettini; Viviana Sisti
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 4.200

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.