Literature DB >> 22856197

Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of a participatory disease surveillance method for highly pathogenic avian influenza in household chicken flocks in Indonesia.

M Robyn1, W B Priyono, L M Kim, E Brum.   

Abstract

A study was conducted to assess the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of a disease surveillance method for diagnosis of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreaks in household chicken flocks used by participatory disease surveillance (PDS) teams in Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia. The Government of Indonesia, in partnership with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, has implemented a PDS method for the detection of HPAI outbreaks in poultry since 2006. The PDS method in Indonesia utilizes both a clinical case definition (CD) and the result of a commercial rapid antigen test kit Yogyakarta 55611, to diagnose HPAI outbreaks, primarily in backyard chicken flocks. The following diagnostic sensitivities and specificities were obtained relative to real-time reverse transcription-PCR as the gold standard diagnostic test: 1) 89% sensitivity (CI95: 75%-97%) and 96% specificity (CI95: 89%-99%) for the PDS CD alone; 2) 86% sensitivity (CI95: 71%-95%) and 99% specificity (CI95: 94%-100%) for the rapid antigen test alone; and 3) 84% sensitivity (CI95: 68%-94%) and 100% specificity (CI95: 96%-100%) for the PDS CD result combined with the rapid antigen test result. Based on these results, HPAI outbreaks in extensively raised household chickens can be diagnosed with sufficient sensitivity and specificity using the PDS method as implemented in Indonesia. Subject to further field evaluation, data from this study suggest that the diagnostic sensitivity of the PDS method may be improved by expanding the PDS CD to include more possible clinical presentations of HPAI and by increasing the number of rapid antigen tests to three different birds with HPAI-compatible signs of same flock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22856197     DOI: 10.1637/9936-091511-Reg.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  4 in total

1.  Rapid antigen testing by community health workers for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Dhaka, Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ayesha Sania; Ahmed Nawsher Alam; A S M Alamgir; Joanna Andrecka; Eric Brum; Fergus Chadwick; Tasnuva Chowdhury; Zakiul Hasan; Davina L Hill; Farzana Khan; Mikolaj Kundegorski; Seonjoo Lee; Mahbubur Rahman; Yael K Rayport; Tahmina Shirin; Motahara Tasneem; Katie Hampson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Experiences in participatory surveillance and community-based reporting systems for H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza: a case study approach.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Mariner; Bryony A Jones; Saskia Hendrickx; Ihab El Masry; Yilma Jobre; Christine C Jost
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.184

3.  African Swine Fever in Uganda: Qualitative Evaluation of Three Surveillance Methods with Implications for Other Resource-Poor Settings.

Authors:  Erika Chenais; Susanna Sternberg-Lewerin; Sofia Boqvist; Ulf Emanuelson; Tonny Aliro; Emma Tejler; Giampaolo Cocca; Charles Masembe; Karl Ståhl
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2015-10-28

4.  Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Outbreaks in West Java Indonesia 2015-2016: Clinical Manifestation and Associated Risk Factors.

Authors:  Desniwaty Karo-Karo; Eko Sugeng Pribadi; Fransiscus Xaverius Sudirman; Sussi Widi Kurniasih; Iin Indasari; David Handojo Muljono; Guus Koch; Jan Arend Stegeman
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-09-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.