Literature DB >> 22854829

Patient recovery expectations in non-chronic non-specific low back pain: a qualitative investigation.

Ross A Iles1, Nicholas F Taylor, Megan Davidson, Paul D O'Halloran.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Low recovery expectations have been identified as a strong and consistent predictor of poor outcome in non-chronic non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). The aim of this study was to explore how people determine their own recovery expectation during an episode of non-chronic NSLBP. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of people with non-chronic NSLBP and low recovery expectations. Interviews were audio--recorded and transcribed verbatim. Two researchers independently applied open coding, followed by axial coding to allow themes to emerge from the data using a constant comparison method.
RESULTS: The central theme of the person and 4 subthemes of pain, progress, performance, and treatment emerged from the data. The formation of recovery expectations was dependent on the person's unique apprasial of their pain, how the condition had progressed, the limitation of their performance of activities, and the impact of different aspects of treatment.
CONCLUSION: Recovery expectation is a person's appraisal of several factors to determine when they are likely to return to their usual activities during an episode of non-chronic NSLBP. Health professionals should explore the person's perception of these factors as part of a tailored intervention to prevent non-chronic NSLBP progressing to chronic NSLBP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22854829     DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1650-1977            Impact factor:   2.912


  10 in total

1.  Vocational rehabilitation program evaluation: comparison group challenges and the role of unmeasured return-to-work expectations.

Authors:  Jeanne M Sears; Lisann R Rolle; Beryl A Schulman; Thomas M Wickizer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-12

2.  Expectations for Return to Work After Workplace Injuries: The Relationship Between Estimated Time to Return to Work and Estimate Accuracy.

Authors:  Amanda Ellen Young; Elyssa Besen; Joanna Willetts
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-12

Review 3.  What is pain: Are cognitive and social features core components?

Authors:  Kenneth D Craig; Nicole E MacKenzie
Journal:  Paediatr Neonatal Pain       Date:  2021-05-04

4.  How do low back pain patients conceptualize their expectations regarding treatment? Content analysis of interviews.

Authors:  T M Haanstra; L Hanson; R Evans; F A van Nes; H C W De Vet; P Cuijpers; R W J G Ostelo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Attributes Underlying Non-surgical Treatment Choice for People With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review.

Authors:  Thomas G Poder; Marion Beffarat
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2021-03-14

6.  Work-Related Factors Considered by Sickness-Absent Employees When Estimating Timeframes for Returning to Work.

Authors:  Amanda E Young; YoonSun Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An Exploration of the Factors Considered When Forming Expectations for Returning to Work following Sickness Absence Due to a Musculoskeletal Condition.

Authors:  Amanda E Young; YoonSun Choi; Elyssa Besen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A qualitative study of influences on older women's practitioner choices for back pain care.

Authors:  Emma R Kirby; Alex F Broom; Jon Adams; David W Sibbritt; Kathryn M Refshauge
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  The Relationship Between Work-Disability Duration and Claimant's Expected Time to Return to Work as Recorded by Workers' Compensation Claims Managers.

Authors:  Amanda E Young; Elyssa Besen; Joanna Willetts
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-06

10.  Clinician and patient beliefs about diagnostic imaging for low back pain: a systematic qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Sweekriti Sharma; Adrian C Traeger; Ben Reed; Melanie Hamilton; Denise A O'Connor; Tammy C Hoffmann; Carissa Bonner; Rachelle Buchbinder; Chris G Maher
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.