Literature DB >> 22853728

Postradioiodine treatment whole-body scan in the era of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for differentiated thyroid carcinoma with elevated serum thyroglobulin levels.

Sophie Leboulleux1, Intidhar El Bez, Isabelle Borget, Manel Elleuch, Désirée Déandreis, Abir Al Ghuzlan, Cécile Chougnet, François Bidault, Haitham Mirghani, Jean Lumbroso, Dana Hartl, Eric Baudin, Martin Schlumberger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) who have a suspicious recurrent or persistent disease based on an elevated serum thyroglobulin (Tg) or Tg antibodies (TgAb) are usually referred for empiric radioiodine ((131)I) administration to localize and treat the disease. The aim of this retrospective monocentric study was to assess the sensitivity of postempiric (131)I whole-body scan (WBS) compared to 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in such patients who had an initial normal postablation WBS.
METHODS: Among 47 consecutive patients with DTC who had a normal postablation WBS and were referred for empiric (131)I administration, 34 patients (12M, 22F; mean age 53 years) underwent FDG PET/CT and form the basis of this report: 23 patients had persistently elevated serum Tg levels, 10 had elevated Tg levels observed during follow-up after they initially became under 1 ng/mL, and 1 had appearance of TgAb during follow-up. Postempiric (131)I WBS and FDG PET/CT were analyzed by independent readers.
RESULTS: A total of 75 lesions were found in 23 patients, distributed in 36 organs. Lesions were located in the neck (30), lungs (28), mediastinum (11), and bones (6). The sensitivities for the detection of individual lesions and for the diagnosis of metastatic organs were 88% and 97% for PET/CT and 16% and 22% for WBS, respectively (p<0.01). PET/CT was abnormal in 22 patients, among which 5 also had an abnormal postempiric (131)I WBS. There was only one patient with an abnormal postempiric (131)I WBS and a normal FDG PET/CT. This patient underwent two further (131)I administrations, with the last WBS being normal and the last stimulated Tg level being undetectable. Other patients were either treated with surgery, or classified as radioactive iodine refractory and treated with levothyroxine suppressive therapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
CONCLUSION: In patients with suspicious recurrence based on the Tg level after a normal postablation WBS, FDG PET/CT is the preferred scintigraphic method to localize disease rather than postempiric (131)I WBS. Empiric (131)I administration may be used only in patients who do not have a significant FDG uptake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22853728     DOI: 10.1089/thy.2012.0081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thyroid        ISSN: 1050-7256            Impact factor:   6.568


  16 in total

Review 1.  2019 European Thyroid Association Guidelines for the Treatment and Follow-Up of Advanced Radioiodine-Refractory Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Laura Fugazzola; Rossella Elisei; Dagmar Fuhrer; Barbara Jarzab; Sophie Leboulleux; Kate Newbold; Jan Smit
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2019-08-28

2.  Adjuvant therapy with 131-iodine in patients with elevated serum thyroglobulin after reoperation due to papillary thyroid carcinoma lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Pedro W Rosario; Gabriela F Mourão; Thassio L Siman; Maria R Calsolari
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Evaluation of (124)I PET/CT and (124)I PET/MRI in the management of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Laurent Dercle; Désirée Deandreis; Marie Terroir; Sophie Leboulleux; Jean Lumbroso; Martin Schlumberger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.568

5.  Relationship between circulating anti-thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAb) and tumor metabolism in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC): prognostic implications.

Authors:  S Morbelli; G Ferrarazzo; E Pomposelli; F Pupo; G Pesce; I Calamia; F Fiz; A Clapasson; M Bauckneht; M Minuto; G Sambuceti; M Giusti; M Bagnasco
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 6.  Optimizing therapy for radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: current state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  R Dadu; M E Cabanillas
Journal:  Minerva Endocrinol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.184

7.  Can the American Thyroid Association Risk of Recurrence Predict Radioiodine Refractory Disease in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer?

Authors:  Aamna Hassan; Saima Riaz; Humayun Bashir; M Khalid Nawaz; Raza Hussain
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2016-10-21

Review 8.  Current practice in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Martin Schlumberger; Sophie Leboulleux
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 43.330

9.  Practice trends in patients with persistent detectable thyroglobulin and negative diagnostic radioiodine whole body scans: a survey of American Thyroid Association members.

Authors:  Robert C Smallridge; Nancy Diehl; Victor Bernet
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 6.568

10.  Prognostic Value of FDG-PET/CT Metabolic Parameters in Metastatic Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Poorni M Manohar; Lauren J Beesley; Emily L Bellile; Francis P Worden; Anca M Avram
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.794

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.