Practice trends in patients with persistent detectable thyroglobulin and negative diagnostic radioiodine whole body scans: a survey of American Thyroid Association members.

BACKGROUND: Management of patients with thyroglobulin (Tg)-positive/scan-negative thyroid cancer remains challenging. American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines recommend potential use of empiric (131)I therapy and various scanning modalities, but no standard for managing such cases exists.
METHODS: We surveyed ATA members to assess current practice in management of patients with Tg-positive/scan-negative disease. Members participated in a web-based survey of six case scenarios of Tg elevations but iodine scan negativity.
RESULTS: A total of 288 ATA members (80% male) participated. Patient age, sex, and basal and stimulated Tg varied between the cases. Respondents were asked their opinion regarding empiric (131)I therapy use, including (131)I dose, use and duration of low-iodine diet, thyroxine withdrawal or recombinant human thyrotropin (rhTSH), and utilization of additional imaging (neck ultrasound (US) or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)) and reconsideration of (131)I therapy. Between 16% and 51% recommended initial use of empiric (131)I for the various scenarios. The majority chose a (131)I dose between 75 and 150 mCi, and 73% employed a low-iodine diet for two or more weeks. Preference between thyroxine withdrawal versus rhTSH was evenly split. More than 98% obtained a neck US if empiric (131)I was not given; 52-89% would proceed to PET/CT if US was negative. Only 44% used rhTSH stimulation in PET scan preparation. (131)I use was more common with stimulated Tg significantly >10 ng/mL. (131)I therapy was slightly more likely with PET-positive (56%) than PET-negative status (45%). Respondents were split regarding empiric (131)I if basal and stimulated Tg increased ≥150% over two years. Providers in North America less commonly utilized (131)I treatment than those from other areas. In the face of possible heterophilic antibody interference in the Tg assay, the majority did not recommend (131)I therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Empiric (131)I therapy is still utilized for patients with Tg-positive/scan-negative disease. Neck US is frequently used to further evaluate such cases as (18)FDG-PET/CT, albeit the latter is used somewhat less often. Use of (131)I therapy correlated with the degree of Tg elevation or development of Tg antibodies, and was recommended more commonly with PET-positive than PET-negative status in patients with lower Tg levels. (131)I was less commonly used by providers within North America.