Literature DB >> 2285320

Dynamics of ruminal ciliated protozoa in feedlot cattle.

G Towne1, T G Nagaraja, R T Brandt, K E Kemp.   

Abstract

Fluctuations in ciliated protozoan concentrations were monitored in 40 individually fed crossbred heifers that were stepped up to an 85% concentrate diet either slowly (12 days) or rapidly (3 days), with or without monensin (30 ppm). Ruminal fluid was withdrawn from all animals by stomach tube at the start of the study, after each group reached full feed, and at 14-day intervals thereafter throughout the finishing period until termination (day 119). Neither monensin nor speed of step-up affected (P greater than 0.10) total protozoan concentrations, ruminal pH, or lactic acid concentrations. Average protozoan concentrations peaked on day 5, progressively declined until day 56, and then increased (P less than 0.05), suggesting an adaptation to ruminal conditions. Concentrations of Isotricha spp. were higher (P less than 0.05) on the final two sampling dates than at any other time. After day 28, Entodinium, Isotricha, and Polyplastron were the only surviving genera. Protozoa were not detected in 11 heifers on day 42 and day 56, but only two animals were defaunated on day 119, indicating either exogenous or endogenous refaunation. Average protozoan concentrations were not different (P greater than 0.25) between ruminal samples collected by stomach tube the day before slaughter (2.8 x 10(5)/g) and digesta samples collected the next day (1.6 x 10(5)/g). In feedlot cattle, defaunation apparently is transitory and individual animals harbor a dynamic protozoan population that fluctuates in response to changing ruminal conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2285320      PMCID: PMC184918          DOI: 10.1128/aem.56.10.3174-3178.1990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  15 in total

1.  Ruminal ciliated protozoa in cattle fed finishing diets with or without supplemental fat.

Authors:  G Towne; T G Nagaraja; R T Brandt; K E Kemp
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Changes in Lactate-Producing and Lactate-Utilizing Bacteria in Relation to pH in the Rumen of Sheep During Stepwise Adaptation to a High-Concentrate Diet.

Authors:  R I Mackie; F M Gilchrist
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Effect of lasalocid, monensin and thiopeptin on rumen protozoa.

Authors:  S M Dennis; T G Nagaraja; A D Dayton
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.534

4.  Monensin level during grain adaptation and finishing performance in cattle.

Authors:  D G Burrin; R A Stock; R A Britton
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Observations on the microbiology and biochemistry of the rumen in cattle given different quantities of a pelleted barley ration.

Authors:  J M Eadie; J Hyldgaard-Jensen; S O Mann; R S Reid; F G Whitelaw
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 6.  Influence of acidosis on rumen function.

Authors:  L L Slyter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effects of monensin on ruminal fluid viscosity, pH, volatile fatty acids and ammonia levels, and microbial activity and population in healthy and bloated feedlot steers.

Authors:  R Sakauchi; S Hoshino
Journal:  Z Tierphysiol Tierernahr Futtermittelkd       Date:  1981

8.  Monensin effects on diet digestibility, ruminal protein bypass and microbial protein synthesis.

Authors:  M I Poos; T L Hanson; T J Klopfenstein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Effect of lasalocid, monensin or thiopeptin on lactic acidosis in cattle.

Authors:  T G Nagaraja; T B Avery; E E Bartley; S K Roof; A D Dayton
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Effect of monensin on rumen ciliate protozoa in sheep.

Authors:  F Gyulai; M Baran
Journal:  Arch Tierernahr       Date:  1988-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Moderation of ruminal fermentation by ciliated protozoa in cattle fed a high-grain diet.

Authors:  T G Nagaraja; G Towne; A A Beharka
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Hunters or farmers? Microbiome characteristics help elucidate the diet composition in an aquatic carnivorous plant.

Authors:  Dagmara Sirová; Jiří Bárta; Karel Šimek; Thomas Posch; Jiří Pech; James Stone; Jakub Borovec; Lubomír Adamec; Jaroslav Vrba
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 14.650

3.  Alteration of Rumen Bacteria and Protozoa Through Grazing Regime as a Tool to Enhance the Bioactive Fatty Acid Content of Bovine Milk.

Authors:  Melissa L Bainbridge; Laurel K Saldinger; John W Barlow; Juan P Alvez; Joe Roman; Jana Kraft
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 5.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.