| Literature DB >> 22849424 |
Zahra Bahadoran1, Mahdieh Golzarand, Parvin Mirmiran, Niloofar Shiva, Fereidoun Azizi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that dietary antioxidants could have favorable effects on the attenuation and prevention of metabolic disorders. In the current study we investigated the association of dietary total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) components and the occurrence of the MetS during a 3-year follow-up.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22849424 PMCID: PMC3556123 DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-9-70
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Characteristics of participants by categories of dietary total antioxidant capacity at baseline: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study¹
| Total antioxidant capacity | | | | | |
| < 842 | 842-958 | 959-1080 | > 1080 | | |
| 764 | 906 | 1014 | 1161 | | |
| Age at baseline | 37.0 ± 0.6 | 40.2 ± 0.5 | 41.4 ± 0.5 | 43.0 ± 0.5 | |
| Men | 53.9 | 46.8 | 39.0 | 34.5 | |
| Physical activity | | | | | |
| 29.2 ± 2.3 | 26.7 ± 2.3 | 22.5 ± 2.3 | 26.0 ± 2.3 | ||
| 8.2 ± 0.7 | 9.9 ± 0.7 | 10.2 ± 0.7 | 12.0 ± 0.7 | ||
| 37.5 ± 2.5 | 36.6 ± 2.4 | 32.7 ± 2.4 | 38.1 ± 2.4 | ||
| Current smoker | 13.7 | 11.0 | 10.8 | 9.2 | |
| Education status | | | | | |
| 2.5 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 2.7 | ||
| 7.5 | 3.2 | 6.5 | 0 | ||
| 81.1 | 90.3 | 83.9 | 91.3 | ||
| 11.3 | 6.5 | 9.7 | 8.7 | ||
1Data are age- and sex-adjusted mean ± SEM.
2P for trend across quartiles of dietary phytochemical index was calculated using Chi square test or linear regression models with adjustment for sex and age.
Metabolic syndrome components and prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its risk factors by categories of dietary total antioxidant capacity: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study¹
| Total antioxidant capacity | | | | | |
| < 842 | 842-958 | 959-1080 | > 1080 | | |
| 764 | 906 | 1014 | 1161 | | |
| Waist circumference | 90 ± 0.5 | 89.0 ± 0.5 | 89 ± 0.5 | 89 ± 0.5 | |
| Fasting blood glucose | 93 ± 1.1 | 91 ± 1.1 | 91 ± 1.1 | 90 ± 1.1 | |
| Serum triglycerides | 148 ± 3.7 | 142 ± 3.7 | 143 ± 3.7 | 137 ± 3.7 | |
| HDL-c | 42.2 ± 0.4 | 41.8 ± 0.4 | 42.2 ± 0.4 | 42.5 ± 0.4 | |
| SBP | 112 ± 0.6 | 112 ± 0.6 | 111 ± 0.6 | 111 ± 0.6 | |
| DBP | 74 ± 0.4 | 74 ± 0.4 | 73 ± 0.4 | 73 ± 0.4 | |
| Abdominal obesity | 44.2 | 43.7 | 46.5 | 38.8 | |
| Hypertriglyceridemia | 34.5 | 31.8 | 30.7 | 31.1 | |
| Low HDL-c | 49.2 | 50.9 | 51.2 | 47.6 | |
| Hyperglycemia | 22.7 | 25.2 | 24.1 | 28.0 | |
| Hypertension | 12.6 | 17.4 | 14.5 | 15.5 | |
| Metabolic syndrome | 24.6 | 27.5 | 27.4 | 25.9 | |
1 Data are age-adjusted mean ± SEM.
2P for trend across quartiles of dietary phytochemical index was calculated using Chi square test or linear regression models with adjustment for sex and age.
Dietary intakes of participants by categories of dietary total antioxidant capacity: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study¹
| Dietary phytochemical index | | | | | |
| < 842 | 842-958 | 959-1080 | > 1080 | | |
| 764 | 906 | 1014 | 1161 | | |
| Energy intake | 2285 ± 29 | 2290 ± 29 | 2254 ± 29 | 2265 ± 29 | |
| Energy density | 107.9 ± 0.9 | 97.6 ± 0.9 | 91.3 ± 0.9 | 88.6 ± 0.9 | |
| Carbohydrate | 58.1 ± 0.3 | 56.8 ± 0.3 | 57.2 ± 0.3 | 58.5 ± 0.3 | |
| Protein | 13.0 ± 0.1 | 13.7 ± 0.1 | 13.9 ± 0.1 | 13.9 ± 0.1 | |
| Fat | 30.5 ± | 31.8 ± 0.3 | 31.7 ± 0.3 | 31.1 ± 0.3 | |
| Saturated fatty acid | 9.7 ± 0.2 | 10.8 ± 0.2 | 10.6 ± 0.2 | 10.6 ± 0.2 | |
| Mono-unsaturated fatty acid | 10.8 ± 0.1 | 11.0 ± 0.1 | 10.9 ± 0.1 | 10.5 ± 0.1 | |
| Poly-unsaturated fatty acid | 6.7 ± 0.1 | 6.7 ± 0.1 | 6.5 ± 0.1 | 6.2 ± 0.1 | |
| Vitamin A | 422 ± 13 | 493 ± 13 | 547 ± 13 | 557 ± 13 | |
| Total carotenoids | 8677 ± 278 | 9731 ± 274 | 10725 ± 274 | 10874 ± 277 | |
| Vitamin E | 11.3 ± 0.2 | 11.6 ± 0.2 | 11.6 ± 0.2 | 12.2 ± 0.2 | |
| Vitamin C | 109 ± 3.5 | 133 ± 3.5 | 158 ± 3.5 | 185 ± 3.5 | |
| Zinc | 10.6 ± 0.1 | 11.3 ± 0.1 | 11.7 ± 0.1 | 11.7 ± 0.1 | |
| Selenium | 111 ± 1.4 | 112 ± 1.4 | 112 ± 1.4 | 108 ± 1.4 | |
| Whole grains | 65.0 ± 4.3 | 87.1 ± 4.2 | 106.3 ± 4.2 | 116.1 ± 4.3 | |
| Fruits | 223 ± 10 | 303 ± 10 | 405 ± 10 | 566 ± 10 | |
| Vegetables | 275 ± 8 | 300 ± 8 | 309 ± 8 | 298 ± 8 | |
| Legumes | 12.5 ± 1.0 | 16.7 ± 0.9 | 18.4 ± 0.9 | 21.7 ± 1.0 | |
| dairy | 329 ± 11 | 447 ± 11 | 516 ± 11 | 596 ± 11 | |
| Nuts | 5.1 ± 0.4 | 5.9 ± 0.4 | 7.7 ± 0.4 | 9.9 ± 0.4 | |
1 Data are age-and energy adjusted mean ± SEM.
2P values compared the dietary intakes of participants across quartiles of dietary phytochemical index using linear regression models with adjustment of sex, age and energy intakes.
The association of dietary TAC and metabolic syndrome components at baseline (2006–2008): Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study¹
| | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total antioxidant capacity | | | | | |
| < 16788 | 16788-22518 | 22518-29249 | > 29249 | | |
| 15333 | 20842 | 24648 | 29857 | | |
| Waist circumference | 0 | -1.6 (-2.56, -0.72) | -2.22 (-3.14, -1.29) | -3.89 (-4.82, -2.95) | |
| Fasting blood glucose | 0 | -2.41 (-5.22, 0.40) | -2.38 (-5.19, 0.44) | -3.02 (-5.87, -0.17) | |
| Serum triglycerides | 0 | -9.27 (-19.70, 1.17) | -10.54 (-21.0, -0.08) | -19.22 (-29.8, -8.64) | |
| HDL-cholesterol | 0 | 0.28 (-0.96, 1.53) | 1.31 (0.06, 2.57) | 2.24 (0.97, 3.5) | |
| Systolic blood pressure | 0 | -0.17 (-1.74, 1.48) | -1.52 (-3.21, 0.39) | -2.53 (-4.41, -0.65) | |
| Diastolic blood pressure | 0 | -0.01(-1.15, 1.34) | -1.23 (-2.45, -0.19) | -2.19 (-3.33, -0.97) | |
1Data are β regression and 95 % CI (Linear regression models were used with adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, physical activity, smoking status, energy and macronutrient intakes; Dietary potassium intake (mg/1000 kcal/d) was additionally adjusted for systolic and diastolic blood pressure).
Figure 1Percent change of the MetS components across quartile categories of dietary TAC during 3-year follow-up. General linear models with adjustment for potential confounding variables were used to compare the percent changes of the MetS components between the quartile categories of the dietary TAC (*P < 0.05). FBS: Fasting blood glucose, TG: Triglycerides, HDL-c: High density lipoprotein cholesterol, SBP: Systolic blood pressure, DBP: Diastolic blood pressure.
Figure 2Odds and 95 % confidence interval for occurrence of the MetS and its components in each quartile categories of dietary TAC after 3-year follow-up. Logistic regression models with adjustment for potential confounding variables were used to OR estimation.