| Literature DB >> 22848823 |
Md Nurul Huda1, Kazi Shahnoor Alam.
Abstract
The prevalence of kidney disease, particularly diabetic and hypertensive kidney disease is increasing rapidly specially in the disadvantageous group of population throughout the world. A cross sectional survey was carried out at certain selected slum areas of Mirpur in Dhaka city of Bangladesh over the period from July 2003 to June 2005, and a total of participants ranging from 15 to 65 years were studied. The analysis discovered that 4.1% of the participants were diabetic, 11.6% were hypertensive, and 7.7% had proteinuria. Based on MDRD equation, 13.1% of the participants were detected as having chronic kidney disease (CKD) while with Cockcroft-Gault equation 16% had CKD. Accordingly, the difference between the two equations was not significant. Association of sociodemographic factors with CKD was not significant except age more than 40 years and marital status. The association between CKD and risk factors like proteinuria, obese and overweight, use of tobacco, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension was highly significant. Combined prevalence of DM, hypertension, and proteinuria among CKD group was also demonstrated to be significantly higher (3.8% with Cockcroft-Gault equation and 5.3% with MDRD equation) than that of normal population. The survey data revealed that CKD and its risk factors like DM and hypertension are alarmingly high in disadvantageous population and adding further pressure to the existing burden of CKD.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22848823 PMCID: PMC3400350 DOI: 10.1155/2012/267329
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nephrol
Figure 1Dominant sociodemographic characteristics of the participants.
Figure 2Distribution of participants by risk factors: The commonest risk-factor was use of tobacco 42.4% either as smoking or chewing or both. 11.6% was hypertensive, 4.1% was diabetics and 20.7% was over-wt and obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/M2).
CKD staging by different equations (N = 1000).
| Staging of CKD | Cockcroft-Gault | MDRD |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Stage 1 | 13 (1.3) | 27 (2.7) |
| Stage 2 | 34 (3.4) | 39 (3.9) |
|
|
|
|
| Stage 4 | 3 (0.3) | 1 (0.1) |
| Stage 5 | 1 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
|
|
|
|
∗Figures in the parentheses denote corresponding %.
Association between CKD (MDRD equation) and sociodemographic variables.
| Socio-demographic variables | Group |
|
∗
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CKD % ( | Normal % ( | |||
| Middle-aged and elderly (age > 40 yrs) | 54.2 | 22.2 | 59.95 | <0.001 |
| Sex (female) | 62.6 | 67.2 | 1.087 | 0.297 |
| Occupation (housewives) | 44.3 | 39.2 | 0.304 | 0.142 |
| Income (≤ 2000 BDT or USD ≤ 30) | 56.3 | 59.0 | 0.304 | 0.581 |
| Literacy (illiterate) | 77.9 | 78.9 | 0.79 | 0.778 |
| Marital status (married) | 93.9 | 83.3 | 9.83 | 0.002 |
∗Data were analysed using Chi-squared (χ 2) test, and level of significance was 0.05. df = 1.
Association of CKD (Cockcroft-Gault equation) with risk-factors.
| Risk factors | Group |
|
∗
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CKD % ( | Normal % ( | |||
| Over-wt and obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/M2)# | 25.6 | 19.6 | 2.94 | 0.086 |
| Use of tobacco# | 58.1 | 39.4 | 19.28 | <0.001 |
| DM (self-reported + RBS > 11.1 mg/dL) # | 10.6 | 2.9 | 20.62 | <0.001 |
| HTN (self-reported + newly diagnosed)# | 31.9 | 7.7 | 76.35 | <0.001 |
| Combined DM and HTN∗ | 3.8 | 0.6 | 8.71 | 0.004 |
| Combined DM, HTN, and proteinuria∗ | 2.5 | 0.4 | 6.209 | 0.015 |
#Data were analysed using Chi-squared (χ 2) test.
∗Data were analysed with the help of Fisher's exact test; level of significance was 0.05.
df = 1.
Association of CKD (MDRD Equation) with risk factors.
| Risk factors | Group |
|
∗
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CKD % ( | Normal % ( | |||
| Over-wt and obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/M2)# | 47.3 | 16.6 | 65.84 | <0.001 |
| Use of tobacco# | 48.9 | 41.4 | 2.57 | 0.059 |
| DM (self-reported + RBS > 11.1 mg/dL)# | 16.8 | 2.2 | 61.77 | <0.001 |
| HTN (self-reported + newly diagnosed)# | 38.9 | 7.5 | 109.81 | <0.001 |
| Combined DM and HTN∗ | 6.1 | 0.3 | 20.86 | <0.001 |
| Combined DM, HTN, and proteinuria∗ | 5.3 | 0 | 28.78 | <0.001 |
#Data were analysed using Chi-squared (χ 2) test.
∗Data were analysed with the help of Fisher's exact test; level of significance was 0.05.
df = 1.