Literature DB >> 22848470

Human bocaviruses are not significantly associated with gastroenteritis: results of retesting archive DNA from a case control study in the UK.

Sameena Nawaz1, David J Allen, Farah Aladin, Christopher Gallimore, Miren Iturriza-Gómara.   

Abstract

Gastroenteritis is a common illness causing considerable morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite improvements in detection methods, a significant diagnostic gap still remains. Human bocavirus (HBoV)s, which are associated with respiratory infections, have also frequently been detected in stool samples in cases of gastroenteritis, and a tentative association between HBoVs, and in particular type-2 HBoVs, and gastroenteritis has previously been made. The aim of this study was to determine the role of HBoVs in gastroenteritis, using archived DNA samples from the case-control Infectious Intestinal Disease Study (IID). DNA extracted from stool samples from 2,256 cases and 2,124 controls were tested for the presence of HBoV DNA. All samples were screened in a real time PCR pan-HBoV assay, and positive samples were then tested in genotype 1 to 3-specific assays. HBoV was detected in 7.4% but no significantly different prevalence was observed between cases and controls. In the genotype-specific assays 106 of the 324 HBoV-positive samples were genotyped, with HBoV-1 predominantly found in controls whilst HBoV-2 was more frequently associated with cases of gastroenteritis (p<0.01). A significant proportion of HBoV positives could not be typed using the type specific assays, 67% of the total positives, and this was most likely due to low viral loads being present in the samples. However, the distribution of the untyped HBoV strains was no different between cases and controls. In conclusion, HBoVs, including HBoV-2 do not appear to be a significant cause of gastroenteritis in the UK population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22848470      PMCID: PMC3404102          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

In 2005 a novel parvovirus was discovered in respiratory secretions of young children and was termed Human Bocavirus (HBoV-1) [1]. Other important members of the parvoviridae family include B19 which causes fith disease and human parvovirus 4 (Parv 4) which has not yet been associated with a disease [2]. Parvoviruses in animals are generally associated with systemic disease but also with respiratory and enteric symptoms [3], [4]. Since the discovery of HBoV-1 three other HBoV genotypes have been described, HBoV-2, HBoV-3 and HBoV-4. The association between HBoV-1 and respiratory disease has previously been well established [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. Although all HBoVs have also been detected in stool samples with prevalences ranging from <1% to 20%, only HBoV-2 has been reported to be associated with symptoms of gastroenteritis [20]. Nevertheless, the role of HBoV2 as an aetiological agent of gastroenteritis has not been clearly confirmed, furthermore, to date, no clear association between the presence of HBoV-3 and HBoV-4 and disease has been established [21], [22]. Recent seroepidemiological studies indicate that exposure to HBoVs occurs early in life and 90% of the population are seropositive by the age of 5, although differences were reported in the seroprevalence of type-specific antibodies to the different HBoVs, which suggested that HBoV-1 infections are more prevalent [23]. The Infectious Intestinal Disease Study (IID Study) was a large case control study of gastroenteritis carried out in the UK between 1993–1996 [24] with the aim to determine the burden and aetiology of sporadic cases IID in the UK population. Initially, the use of classical microbiology diagnostic methods and electron microscopy (for virus detection) failed to detect a potential aetiological agent or toxin in 49% of the cases [25]. Retesting of the archived samples from this study using molecular methods for the detection of enteric viruses, bacteria and protozoa revealed viruses to be the most common aetiological agents of gastroenteritis,the diagnostic gap for IID was reduced to 25% from 49% [26]. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of HBoVs in IID in the UK population, using archived DNA samples from the matched case-control IID-1 study [26]. In addition, the presence specifically of HBoV-1, 2 or 3 was investigated in order to determine any possible associations between specific HBoV genotypes and IID.

Materials and Methods

Samples

A total of 4,380 archived DNA from the IID study [26], [27] were tested for the presence of HBoV DNA. This archive comprised DNA extracted from stool samples from 2,256 cases and 2,124 controls.

Pan- HBoV Detection Assay

The qPCR assay targeted the NS1 gene (Ratcliff et al., unpublished method, personal communication) and was performed using an ABI Taqman7500. Oligonucleotide primer and probe sequences and positions are described in table 1.
Table 1

HBoV-specific oligonucleotide primers and probes (all located at the NS gene).

PrimersSequence (5′-3′)Nt positionsreference
Pan qpcr primers
Pan-HBoV-F ATA AAG TTC CAA ACT CAT TTC CTC TTG 1994–2020Ratcliff et al*
Pan-HBoV-RAGT GCA GWA TCC GTT TTC GTG 2079-2059Ratcliff et al*
Pan HBoV1-FTCT CC GGC GAG TGA ACA TC 201–219This study
Type-specific qpcr primers (anti-sense)
HBoV1-R CAT CCG GAT GAG GAG CGC 424-407This study
HBoV2-R CTT CAG GAT GTG GTG CGC 427-410This study
HBoV3-RCAT CCG GAT GAG GA CAC405-392This study
Generic PCR primers for sequencing
HBoV01.2F TAT GGC CAA GGC AAT CGT CCA AG 2091 [29]
HBoV02.2R GCC GCG TGA ACA TGA GAA ACA GA 1791 [29]
Probes
pan HBoV-NS16FAM-CCT TTG TCC TAC WCA TTC-MGBBNFQ2025–2042Ratcliff et al*
HBoV-16Fam- TAT CAT AGA TTG TTC AGT TCC AGT AGC-MGBBNFQ393-372This study
HBoV-26Vic- TT GGA TCA TGA GAC GTT CAG TCC C-MGBBNFQ399-376This study
HBoV-36Ned- CTG GAT CAT GGC TTG CTC GGT A-MGBBNFQ377-351This study

Unpublished method, personal communication.

Unpublished method, personal communication. The reaction consisted of 0.1 M DDT (Invitrogen), 1X Platinum Quantitative PCR Supermix-UDG (Invitrogen), Pan-HBoV-F and Pan-HBoV-R primers each at a concentration of 100 µm, Pan-HBoV-NS1 probe at 10 µm concentration, ROX 25 µm (Invitrogen) 2.5 µl of template DNA and RNase free water to a final reaction volume of 25 µl. The amplification consisted of an initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles with denaturation at 95°C for 15 sec, annealing at 55°C for 30 sec and extension at 60°C for 45 sec.

HBoV1, 2 and 3 Genotyping qPCR Assays

HBoV-1, 2 and 3-specific primer pair and probes were designed in house through alignment of sequence data available in GenBank. The reaction conditions are as follows; 1X Platinum Quantitative PCR Supermix-UDG (Invitrogen), HBoV-NS1-1F, HBoV-1R, HBoV2-R and HBoV3R primers each at a concentration of 20 µm, the HBoV1,2 and 3 probe at 10 µm concentration, ROX 25 µm (Invitrogen), 2.5 µl of template and RNase free water was added to a final reaction volume of 25 µl. The amplification conditions for the typing assay are the same as those described in the HBoV NS1 detection assay above.

Plasmid Controls

Plasmids containing a 1773 bp and a 1737 bp region of the NS1 encoding gene of HBoV-1 and HBoV-3 respectively were used for assay optimisation and as controls. Control material was kindly provided by R. Ratcliff, Adelaide, Australia. The controls were also used in order to generate a standard curve for use with the pan-HBoV assay in order to allow for normalisation of the data generated including the comparison of relative sensitivities of the different assays and for quantitation of DNA present in each of the positive samples. The standard curve was generated using the plasmid containing a genome segment of the HBoV-1 and consisted of a series of 10 fold dilution containing from 300,000 copies/µl down to 3 copies/µl. Inter- and intra-assay reproducibility was analysed by performing replicate testing of the standards in a single run (X11) and repeated runs (X2), and the standard curve was also included in each assay run for quality control and normalisation of results.

Untypable Strains

A subset of 17 samples positive in the Pan-HBoV assay but which failed to amplify in the type-specific assays were confirmed using an alternative method published elsewhere [28], [29], and 6 were further confirmed though direct sequencing of the amplicons obtained after purification either from solution or agarose gels using Agencourt AMPure (Beckman Coulter, USA) and GeneClean Spin kit (QBiogene), respectively, following manufactures protocols.

Statistical Analysis

The chi-squared test was used in order to evaluate the significance of differences observed between groups. For comparison of median values (analysis of CT values) the Mann Witney U-test was used. Prevalence Odds Ratio (POR = Pcases/(1-Pcases)/Pcontrols/(1-Pcontrols)) was calculated in the total cohorts and by age group. POR = prevalence odds ratio.

Results

Prevalence of Infection with HBoVs

A total of 7.4% of the samples tested were positive for HBoV. No statistically significant differences were seen in the prevalence of HBoV between cases and asymptomatic controls, POR = 0.79 (Table 2). Peak HBoV infection was observed in children under the age of 5, both in cases and controls, with significantly higher HBoV incidence in children between 1 and 4 in asymptomatic controls than in the cases of gastroenteritis (POR = 0.6; p<0.02). The number of HBoV positives in older age groups was too small for meaningful statistical analysis.
Table 2

Age distribution of HBoV positive samples in cases and controls of IID.

CASESCONTROLSALLTOTAL
Age Group (years)HBoV pos%TOTALHBoV pos%TOTALPORHBoV pos%TOTAL
<13426.21306234.81780.665149631.2308
1–45812.24769118.05060.63314915.2982
5–996.913186.01341.16112176.4265
10–1954.411421.91032.3763573.2217
20–2972.428621.11772.2108891.9463
30–3982.236531.02942.22699111.7659
40–49114.424920.82405.70711132.7489
50–5984.019910.51928.2916792.3391
60–6952.917531.71771.7269682.3352
>7043.113110.81233.9669852.0254
TOTAL 149 6.6 2256 175 8.2 2124 0.79109 324 7.4 4380

POR = prevalence odds ratio.

Viral Load

The average CT values were 34.5 and 34.8, and the median CT values were 36.3 and 37.4 in cases and controls respectively (see distribution in Figure 1). The majority of HBoV-positives in both cases and controls had copy numbers ranging between 30 and 299 copies/reaction (or between 4.5×103 and 4.5×104 copies/ml of feaces). The distribution of HBoV viral loads between cases and controls was comparable and the median CT values between cases and controls were not significantly different (U-test; z = 0.458139, p>0.05).
Figure 1

HBoV detection assays, CT distribution in cases and controls.

HBoV in the Presence of Other Enteric Pathogens

HBoV DNA was found in 149 (46%) samples in the absence of other co-pathogens (Table 3). No statistically significant differences were observed in the proportion of cases or controls in which HBoV was found as a single organism or in the presence of one or more pathogens in the cohort as a whole, however in the 1–4 years of age group, HBoV in the absence of any other enteric pathogens was found in 29% of the cases, but in 56% of the controls (p<0.05).
Table 3

Distribution of HBoV-positive samples in cases and controls with or without a co-infection.

CASESCONTROLSTOTAL
Age GroupSingle HBoVMultiple infectionsSingle HBoVMultiple infectionsSingle HBoVAll HBoV positives
<1181624384296
1–41741514068149
5–92744617
10–19051117
20–29432069
30–394421611
40–496520813
50–59531069
60–69321248
>70220125
TOTAL61888887149324
% of total positives 40.9 59.1 50.3 49.7 46.0

Temporal Distribution of HBoV Infections

HBoV infections were detected year round although a peak was observed in the spring/early summer months, between April and June 1994 (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Temporal distribution of HBoV infections.

Distribution of HBoV by Gender

HBoV DNA was found in 48.8% and 45.7% of female cases and controls, respectively. The distribution of HBoV among females and males was not significantly different from the distribution of females and males in the entire cohort which was 53% and 47%, respectively.

Distribution of HBoV Genotypes

A total of 106 (32.7%) HBoV positives were genotyped, whilst 218 (67.3%) remained untyped after testing in the HBoV types 1, 2 or 3 specific assays (Table 4). HBoV-1 detection was found predominantly in controls, (p<0.001) and HBoV-2 was predominantly associated with cases (p<0.01). The prevalence of HBoV-3 was not significantly different between cases and controls. HBoV-1 and -3 were predominantly found in children (Table 4). HBoV-2 in the absence of any other pathogen was detected in 17 (81.3%) of the cases, compared to 9 (47.4%) of the controls. In cases, HBoV-2 was found across the age groups, although more frequently in children <5, whereas in controls they were found predominantly in children <5 with only 1 example in an adult (Table 4). The prevalence of HBoV-2 in children <5 years old was however not significantly different between cases and controls, 2.8% and 2.6%, respectively.
Table 4

Distribution of HBoV genotypes in cases and controls.

COHORTAge Group(years)HBoV-1HBoV-1+HBoV-2HBoV-2HBoV-3UntypedTOTAL
CASES<111922134
1–431864058
5–91179
10–192125
20–29257
30–39358
40–492911
50–59358
>70224
60–6955
CASES Total423210101149
Percent 2.7 1.3 21.5 6.7 67.8 100.0
CONTROLS<11011043762
1–414866391
5–9178
10–1922
20–2922
30–39213
40–4922
50–5911
60–69123
>7011
CONTROLS Total2411914117175
Percent 13.7 0.6 10.9 8.0 66.9 100.0
GRAND TOTAL 28 3 51 24 218 324
Percent 8.6 0.9 15.7 7.4 67.3 100.0
A subset of HBoV that were negative in the type 1,2 or 3-specific assays were confirmed in an alternative pan-HBoV PCR, and sequencing of a small number confirmed them as types 1, 2 or 3. The majority of the untyped samples (70%) had a CT value of >37 in the screening pan-HBoV PCR, indicative of low viral loads being present in the samples.

Discussion

This represents the largest study to date investigating the role and distribution of HBoVs infections in community acquired sporadic gastroenteritis and in asymptomatic controls. The prevalence of HBoV infection in the UK population was found to be 7.4% across all ages, with a higher percentage of the infections occurring in children <5 years of age (19%). However, the prevalence of HBoV infections was comparable in cases of gastroenteritis and in age-matched asymptomatic controls. Although the presence of enteric pathogens, eg norovirus or rotavirus, in asymptomatic individuals is well documented, a significantly higher prevalence of the pathogen is seen in cases than in the controls [26]. Therefore, our data suggests that HBoV are not causally associated with gastrointestinal disease in the UK population as a whole, nor in children. The prevalence of detection of HBoV in stool samples in previous studies varies widely (see summary in Table 5), but most coincide in reporting the highest prevalence in children.
Table 5

Summary of published studies on the prevalence of HBoV in stool samples.

CountrySampling dateCases NoControls NoPopulation studied% CasesHBoV-pos% Controls HBoV-posMain ConclusionRef
AustraliaJan-Dec 2001.186186Paediatric17.20%8.10%HBoV-2 associated with gastroenteritis (only if cases with a concomitant bacterial infection included). [22]
(HBoV-2)(HBoV-2)Temporal pattern observed : summer months.
BrazilJan 2003–Dec 2005.705NDPaediatric2.0% (HBoV)NDNo obvious temporal clustering of the HBoV-positive patients.[39]
ChinaJuly 2006–Sept 2007.397115Paediatric3.50% (HBoV)3.50% (HBoV)HBoV not associated with gastroenteritis. Temporal patterns observed : winter months. [28].
ChinaJuly 2006–June 2008.632162Paediatric20.40% (HBoV-2)12.30% (HBoV-2)No statistically significant association between HBoV detection and gastroenteritis. [32]
GermanyJan-Feb and Sept–Dec 2007.307NDPaediatric (daycare outbreaks)4.60% (HBoV)HBoV was not associated with outbreaks of gastroenteritis in childrenin day care.[40]
Hong KongNov 2004–Oct 2005.1,435NDND2.10%Same virus found in respiratory and stool samples. [13]
KoreaJan 2005–Dec 2006.962NDPaediatric0.80% (HBoV)Temporal patterns observed : summer months.[41]
South KoreaMay 2008–April 2009.358NDPaediatric0.5% (HBoV-1) 3.6% (HBoV-2)Temporal pattern observed : winter months. [31]
SpainDec 2005–Mar 2006.527NDPaediatric9.10% (HBoV)Prevalence of HBoVs in respiratory and stool samples was similar.[42]
ThailandNov 2005–Sep 2006.225202Paediatric0.90% (HBoV)0Low prevalence. No statistically significant difference between casesand controls (p = 0.17).[43]
USADec 1–Marc 31 2008.479NDPaedriatic and adult1.30% (HBoV2)0.7% children and 1.5% adults.[45]
HBoV infections were detected all year round in the UK although a tentative peak was observed in the spring/early summer months in 1994 (between April and June). Different seasonal patterns in the peak prevalence of HBoV have been reported in different countries (see Table 5), Of the 324 HBoV positive samples, 106 (32.7%) were genotyped in the type-specific assays. HBoV-1 was found predominantly in controls (p<0.001) and the prevalence of HBoV-3 was similar in cases and controls. Both HBoV-1 and -3 were predominantly found in children. HBoV-2 was predominantly associated with gastroenteritis cases (p<0.01). The overall prevalence in cases was 1.4% and 0.8% in controls, however, in children <5 year of age, the prevalence in cases and controls was similar, 2.8% and 2.6%, respectively. The prevalence of HBoV-2 in children in the UK was significantly lower than that reported in a study in Australia, in which HBoV-2 was detected in 17.2% and 8.1% of the cases and controls, respectively [22]. The findings of the study in Australia lead to the proposal of HBoV-2 as an important aetiological agent of infantile gastroenteritis. It is noteworthy however, that in the Australian study, the association of HBoV-2 with gastroenteritis was only significant when cases with a bacterial co-pathogen were included in the analysis. Although in the present study HBoV-2 in the absence of other enteric pathogens was found more frequently in cases than in controls, the small numbers found in such large study suggest that the role of these viruses in IID, if any, is likely to be small. A lack of correlation between HBoVs or HBoV-2 and paediatric gastroenteritis was also reported in several smaller studies published elsewhere [30], [31], [32]. A total of 67% of the HBoV-positive samples could not be genotyped using the genotype-specific PCR assays. The majority of these untyped samples (70%) had CT values >37. This suggests that failure to type may be associated with low viral loads and differences in the relative sensitivities of the genotyping assays compared to the detection assay. Although under experimental conditions and using plasmid controls the sensitivities of all assays were comparable, it is likely that when applied to true clinical samples the sensitivity of the type-specific assays was inferior, possibly due to as yet not identified strain variability within genotypes. Also, a HBoV type 4-specific assay was not included in this study, therefore, any possible HBoV4 infections would not have been typed. Of the panel of samples that were tested in an alternative pan-HBoV PCR, the strains typed through sequencing were HBoV-1 (2 samples), HBoV-2 (1 sample) and HBoV-3 (3 samples). Furthermore, the distribution of untyped HBoVs was not significantly different in cases and controls. HBoVs in the absence of other enteric pathogens were seen in 46% of the HBoV-positive samples, and more frequently in the controls, 50.3% vs 40.9% in cases. No significant difference in HBoV load was observed between cases and controls, or between the samples positive for HBoV alone or in the presence of other pathogens. Previous studies have investigated the relationships between viral load and disease severity [33], [34], [35], [36], [37]. In respiratory infections significantly higher HBoV loads were seen in samples collected from children positive for HBoV alone than in those from children with co-infections. In respiratory infections also, viral loads >104 were associated with disease, whereas loads <104 were associated with asymptomatic children [33], [38]. This lead to the suggestion that higher viral loads are indicative of a causative role of HBoV in respiratory infections [33], [38]. However, Brieu et al [38] found no significant correlation between viral load and clinical symptoms or disease severity. In conclusion, the results obtained from investigating for the presence of HBoV DNA in archived DNA samples from a large and previously well described case-control study of IID suggest that HBoV, including HBoV-2,do not appear to be a significant cause of gastroenteritis in the UK population, and particularly in the paediatric population. Although HBoVs are relatively frequent across all ages, and in particular in preschool age children, they are found just as frequently among children and adults without symptoms of gastroenteritis.
  37 in total

1.  Cloning of a human parvovirus by molecular screening of respiratory tract samples.

Authors:  Tobias Allander; Martti T Tammi; Margareta Eriksson; Annelie Bjerkner; Annika Tiveljung-Lindell; Björn Andersson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Detection of viral, bacterial, and parasitological RNA or DNA of nine intestinal pathogens in fecal samples archived as part of the english infectious intestinal disease study: assessment of the stability of target nucleic acid.

Authors:  Corinne Francoise Laurence Amar; Claire Louise East; Kathleen A Grant; Jim Gray; Miren Iturriza-Gomara; Elisabeth Alexandra Maclure; Jim McLauchlin
Journal:  Diagn Mol Pathol       Date:  2005-06

3.  New DNA viruses identified in patients with acute viral infection syndrome.

Authors:  Morris S Jones; Amit Kapoor; Vladimir V Lukashov; Peter Simmonds; Frederick Hecht; Eric Delwart
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  A study of infectious intestinal disease in England: microbiological findings in cases and controls.

Authors:  D S Tompkins; M J Hudson; H R Smith; R P Eglin; J G Wheeler; M M Brett; R J Owen; J S Brazier; P Cumberland; V King; P E Cook
Journal:  Commun Dis Public Health       Date:  1999-06

5.  Detection of human bocavirus in Japanese children with lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  Xiaoming Ma; Rika Endo; Nobuhisa Ishiguro; Takashi Ebihara; Hiroaki Ishiko; Tadashi Ariga; Hideaki Kikuta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Minute virus of canines (MVC, canine parvovirus type-1): pathogenicity for pups and seroprevalence estimate.

Authors:  L E Carmichael; D H Schlafer; A Hashimoto
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.279

7.  Quantitation of group A rotavirus by real-time reverse-transcription-polymerase chain reaction: correlation with clinical severity in children in South India.

Authors:  Gagandeep Kang; Miren Iturriza-Gomara; Jeremy G Wheeler; Premila Crystal; Bindhu Monica; Sasirekha Ramani; Beryl Primrose; Prabhakar D Moses; Chris I Gallimore; David W Brown; Jim Gray
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.327

8.  Human bocavirus: prevalence and clinical spectrum at a children's hospital.

Authors:  John C Arnold; Kumud K Singh; Stephen A Spector; Mark H Sawyer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Evidence of human coronavirus HKU1 and human bocavirus in Australian children.

Authors:  Theo P Sloots; Peter McErlean; David J Speicher; Katherine E Arden; Michael D Nissen; Ian M Mackay
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 3.168

10.  Frequent detection of human rhinoviruses, paramyxoviruses, coronaviruses, and bocavirus during acute respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  Katherine E Arden; Peter McErlean; Michael D Nissen; Theo P Sloots; Ian M Mackay
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.327

View more
  11 in total

1.  Mapping Antigenic Epitopes on the Human Bocavirus Capsid.

Authors:  Shweta Kailasan; Jamie Garrison; Maria Ilyas; Paul Chipman; Robert McKenna; Kalle Kantola; Maria Söderlund-Venermo; Indrė Kučinskaitė-Kodzė; Aurelija Žvirblienė; Mavis Agbandje-McKenna
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Frequent Detection and Genetic Diversity of Human Bocavirus in Urban Sewage Samples.

Authors:  M Iaconelli; M Divizia; S Della Libera; P Di Bonito; Giuseppina La Rosa
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Human Bocavirus: Detection, Quantification and Molecular Characterization in Sewage and Surface Waters in Uruguay.

Authors:  Matías Salvo; Andrés Lizasoain; Matías Castells; Viviana Bortagaray; Sebastián Castro; Rodney Colina; Fernando Lopez Tort; Matías Victoria
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Detection of Human Bocavirus Species 2 and 3 in Bivalve Shellfish in Italy.

Authors:  G La Rosa; G Purpari; A Guercio; S Di Bella; F Gucciardi; Y T R Proroga; M Pisanu; S Della Libera; M Iaconelli; E Suffredini
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Relative Abundance of Human Bocaviruses in Urban Sewage in Greater Cairo, Egypt.

Authors:  Hazem Hamza; Mats Leifels; Michael Wilhelm; Ibrahim Ahmed Hamza
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Human bocaviruses are commonly found in stools of hospitalized children without causal association to acute gastroenteritis.

Authors:  Minna Paloniemi; Suvi Lappalainen; Marjo Salminen; Minna Kätkä; Kalle Kantola; Lea Hedman; Klaus Hedman; Maria Söderlund-Venermo; Timo Vesikari
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  The Human Bocavirus Is Associated with Some Lung and Colorectal Cancers and Persists in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Verena Schildgen; Monika Malecki; Ramona-Liza Tillmann; Michael Brockmann; Oliver Schildgen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Clinical epidemiology and molecular profiling of human bocavirus in faecal samples from children with diarrhoea in Guangzhou, China.

Authors:  D-M Zhang; M-M Ma; W-T Wen; X Zhu; L Xu; Z-J He; X He; J-H Wu; Y-W Hu; Y Zheng; Y Deng; C-J Lin; J-H Lu; M-F Li; K-Y Cao
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.434

9.  Human Bocavirus Infection Markers in Peripheral Blood and Stool Samples of Children with Acute Gastroenteritis.

Authors:  Zaiga Nora-Krukle; Anda Vilmane; Man Xu; Santa Rasa; Inga Ziemele; Elina Silina; Maria Söderlund-Venermo; Dace Gardovska; Modra Murovska
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  B-Cell Responses to Human Bocaviruses 1-4: New Insights from a Childhood Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Kalle Kantola; Lea Hedman; Laura Tanner; Ville Simell; Marjaana Mäkinen; Juulia Partanen; Mohammadreza Sadeghi; Riitta Veijola; Mikael Knip; Jorma Ilonen; Heikki Hyöty; Jorma Toppari; Olli Simell; Klaus Hedman; Maria Söderlund-Venermo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.