| Literature DB >> 22848350 |
Michael Abend1, Ruth M Pfeiffer, Christian Ruf, Maureen Hatch, Tetiana I Bogdanova, Mykola D Tronko, Armin Riecke, Julia Hartmann, Viktor Meineke, Houda Boukheris, Alice J Sigurdson, Kiyohiko Mabuchi, Alina V Brenner.
Abstract
The strong and consistent relationship between irradiation at a young age and subsequent thyroid cancer provides an excellent model for studying radiation carcinogenesis in humans. We thus evaluated differential gene expression in thyroid tissue in relation to iodine-131 (I-131) doses received from the Chernobyl accident. Sixty three of 104 papillary thyroid cancers diagnosed between 1998 and 2008 in the Ukrainian-American cohort with individual I-131 thyroid dose estimates had paired RNA specimens from fresh frozen tumor (T) and normal (N) tissue provided by the Chernobyl Tissue Bank and satisfied quality control criteria. We first hybridized 32 randomly allocated RNA specimen pairs (T/N) on 64 whole genome microarrays (Agilent, 4×44 K). Associations of differential gene expression (log(2)(T/N)) with dose were assessed using Kruskall-Wallis and trend tests in linear mixed regression models. While none of the genes withstood correction for the false discovery rate, we selected 75 genes with a priori evidence or P kruskall/P trend <0.0005 for validation by qRT-PCR on the remaining 31 RNA specimen pairs (T/N). The qRT-PCR data were analyzed using linear mixed regression models that included radiation dose as a categorical or ordinal variable. Eleven of 75 qRT-PCR assayed genes (ACVR2A, AJAP1, CA12, CDK12, FAM38A, GALNT7, LMO3, MTA1, SLC19A1, SLC43A3, ZNF493) were confirmed to have a statistically significant differential dose-expression relationship. Our study is among the first to provide direct human data on long term differential gene expression in relation to individual I-131 doses and to identify a set of genes potentially important in radiation carcinogenesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22848350 PMCID: PMC3405097 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Two stage study design with inclusion and exclusion criteria of cases and selection of gene candidates.
3) or strong up−/down-regulation in other studies of thyroid cancer in irradiated populations [19], [27]. Thus, 75 genes were selected for validation by means of qRT-PCR (Table S1). In addition, to evaluate agreement between whole genome microarray and qRT-PCR measurements, we ran qRT-PCR (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany) for these genes among the 32 individuals included in Phase I.
Characteristics of papillary thyroid cancer cases from the Ukrainian-American study cohort, 1998–2008.
| Characteristic | N or Mean ± SD | % or range |
| Gender, female | 35 | 56 |
| Oblast of residence | ||
| Zhytomyr | 15 | 24 |
| Kiev | 14 | 22 |
| Chernigov | 34 | 54 |
| Age at exposure, year | 7.9±4.6 | 0−<18 |
| Latency, year | 16.5±2.7 | 12.5–21.6 |
| I-131 thyroid dose, Gy | 1.25±1.68 | 0.008–8.6 |
| 0.008–0.30 | 23 | 36 |
| 0.31–1.0 | 23 | 36 |
| 1.1–8.6 | 27 | 43 |
| Tumor size, mm | 16.0±7.8 | 6.0–45.0 |
| Histological subtype of PTC | ||
| solid | 5 | 8 |
| papillary | 12 | 19 |
| follicular | 16 | 25 |
| mixed | 30 | 48 |
At the time of first screening examination.
On April 26, 1986.
Differences between surgery date and April 26, 1986.
Largest dimension at pathomorphology.
NB: Not all percentages sum to 100 due to rounding.
Summary statistics for genes with significant differential dose-expression relationship based on qRT-PCR measurements.
| fold-change per dose category | |||||||
| Gene | Cytoband | CNV | N | 1 | 2 | P | P trend |
|
| 2q22.3 | no | 31 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.001 | 0.02 |
|
| 1p36.32 | amplified | 20 | 1.1 | 2.4 | 0.06 | 0.03 |
|
| 15q22.2 | no | 31 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
|
| 17q12 | no | 31 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
|
| 16q24.3 | amplified | 31 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.0004 | 0.04 |
|
| 4q31.1 | no | 31 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.06 | 0.02 |
|
| 12p12.3 | amplified | 31 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
|
| 14q32.33 | amplified | 31 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 0.01 | 0.002 |
|
| 21q22.3 | amplified | 31 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.002 | 0.13 |
|
| 11q12.1 | amplified | 31 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 0.01 | 0.99 |
|
| 19p12 | no | 31 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.0001 | 0.74 |
CNV, Copy number variation as reported in Stein et al. with either amplified regions or not (no) is shown for each cytoband where our candidate genes are located.
Number of paired (tumor/normal tissue) observations.
Columns with subtitles 1 and 2 refer to dose categories (1 and 2) and reflect the fold change in differential gene expression for a specific dose category relative to the referent dose category (0). Fold change in expression associated with dose were computed as two to the power of the difference in the slopes, i.e. 2ˆ(dosetumor−dosenormal).
Two degree of freedom test in differential dose-response.
One degree of freedom trend test in differential dose-response.
All models of differential dose-response were adjusted for tissue type, attained age, sex, and oblast of residence.
Figure 2Residual gene expression by tissue type in relation to I-131 thyroid dose estimates.
Note: Mean of residual gene expression after removing the effects of age, oblast, and sex is plotted separately for normal tissue (left part of the graph) and tumor tissue (right part of the graph) against the mean of three I-131 dose categories (0.11, 0.57, 2.62 Gy). Circles with grey fills correspond to mean gene expression values for normal tissue and squares with black fills correspond to mean gene expression values for tumor tissue. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. P-values for association with dose are based on a 2 degree of freedom test and a 1 degree of freedom trend test, respectively, and given separately for normal and tumor tissue in the bottom of each panel.
Figure 3Residual gene expression by tissue type in relation to I-131 thyroid dose estimates.
Note: Mean of residual gene expression after removing the effects of age, oblast, and sex is plotted separately for normal tissue (left part of the graph) and tumor tissue (right part of the graph) against the mean of three I-131 dose categories (0.11, 0.57, 2.62 Gy). Circles with grey fills correspond to mean gene expression values for normal tissue and squares with black fills correspond to mean gene expression values for tumor tissue. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. P-values for association with dose are based on a 2 degree of freedom test and a 1 degree of freedom trend test, respectively, and given separately for normal and tumor tissue in the bottom of each panel.