OBJECTIVES: Eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) is the most prevalent eating disorder, yet its heterogeneity begs less reliance on this broad diagnostic category. The purpose of this study was to compare women with anorexia nervosa (AN) and EDNOS, AN type (EDNOS-AN) from a multisite study on eating-related and general psychopathology measures. METHODS: One hundred eighteen participants (n = 59 with DSM-IV AN, n = 59 with EDNOS-AN) completed structured interviews, questionnaires and a physical examination at baseline. In addition, participants carried a handheld palm pilot computer for 2 weeks to provide ecological momentary assessment (EMA) information about mood and eating disorder behaviours. RESULTS: No significant differences between AN and EDNOS-AN were found on the self-report and interview measures, or on the EMA mood assessments. The only differences to emerge were that participants with AN reported higher rates of binge eating and purging on EMA compared with those with EDNOS-AN, whereas EDNOS-AN reported higher rates of checking thighs and joints on EMA compared with those with AN. For the physiological parameters, AN presented with lower white blood cell counts compared with EDNOS-AN. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the clinical significance of EDNOS-AN and support a closer look at the definition of AN as proposed by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition.
OBJECTIVES:Eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) is the most prevalent eating disorder, yet its heterogeneity begs less reliance on this broad diagnostic category. The purpose of this study was to compare women with anorexia nervosa (AN) and EDNOS, AN type (EDNOS-AN) from a multisite study on eating-related and general psychopathology measures. METHODS: One hundred eighteen participants (n = 59 with DSM-IV AN, n = 59 with EDNOS-AN) completed structured interviews, questionnaires and a physical examination at baseline. In addition, participants carried a handheld palm pilot computer for 2 weeks to provide ecological momentary assessment (EMA) information about mood and eating disorder behaviours. RESULTS: No significant differences between AN and EDNOS-AN were found on the self-report and interview measures, or on the EMA mood assessments. The only differences to emerge were that participants with AN reported higher rates of binge eating and purging on EMA compared with those with EDNOS-AN, whereas EDNOS-AN reported higher rates of checking thighs and joints on EMA compared with those with AN. For the physiological parameters, AN presented with lower white blood cell counts compared with EDNOS-AN. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the clinical significance of EDNOS-AN and support a closer look at the definition of AN as proposed by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition.
Authors: Daniel le Grange; Roslyn B Binford; Carol B Peterson; Scott J Crow; Ross D Crosby; Marjorie H Klein; Anna M Bardone-Cone; Thomas E Joiner; James E Mitchell; Stephen A Wonderlich Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Christopher G Fairburn; Zafra Cooper; Kristin Bohn; Marianne E O'Connor; Helen A Doll; Robert L Palmer Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2007-02-04
Authors: James E Mitchell; Ross D Crosby; Stephen A Wonderlich; Laura Hill; Daniel le Grange; Pauline Powers; Kamryn Eddy Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Kamryn T Eddy; Angela Celio Doyle; Renee Rienecke Hoste; David B Herzog; Daniel le Grange Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Joshua M Smyth; Stephen A Wonderlich; Kristin E Heron; Martin J Sliwinski; Ross D Crosby; James E Mitchell; Scott G Engel Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2007-08
Authors: Scott J Crow; W Stewart Agras; Katherine Halmi; James E Mitchell; Helena C Kraemer Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Ann F Haynos; Kelly C Berg; Li Cao; Ross D Crosby; Jason M Lavender; Linsey M Utzinger; Stephen A Wonderlich; Scott G Engel; James E Mitchell; Daniel Le Grange; Carol B Peterson; Scott J Crow Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2016-11-28
Authors: Jason M Lavender; Kyle P De Young; Michael D Anestis; Stephen A Wonderlich; Ross D Crosby; Scott G Engel; James E Mitchell; Scott J Crow; Carol B Peterson; Daniel Le Grange Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2013-07-20 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Jason M Lavender; Stephen A Wonderlich; Ross D Crosby; Scott G Engel; James E Mitchell; Scott J Crow; Carol B Peterson; Daniel Le Grange Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2013-05-27
Authors: Kyle P De Young; Jason M Lavender; Ross D Crosby; Stephen A Wonderlich; Scott G Engel; James E Mitchell; Scott J Crow; Carol B Peterson; Daniel Le Grange Journal: Appetite Date: 2014-08-15 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Ann F Haynos; Ross D Crosby; Scott G Engel; Jason M Lavender; Stephen A Wonderlich; James E Mitchell; Carol B Peterson; Scott J Crow; Daniel Le Grange Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Jason M Lavender; Tyler B Mason; Linsey M Utzinger; Stephen A Wonderlich; Ross D Crosby; Scott G Engel; James E Mitchell; Daniel Le Grange; Scott J Crow; Carol B Peterson Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Kyle P De Young; Jason M Lavender; Kristine Steffen; Stephen A Wonderlich; Scott G Engel; James E Mitchell; Scott J Crow; Carol B Peterson; Daniel Le Grange; Joseph Wonderlich; Ross D Crosby Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2013-07-19 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Carly R Pacanowski; Emily M Pisetsky; Kelly C Berg; Ross D Crosby; Scott J Crow; Jennifer A Linde; James E Mitchell; Scott G Engel; Marjorie H Klein; Tracey L Smith; Daniel Le Grange; Stephen A Wonderlich; Carol B Peterson Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Eva M Conceição; Ross Crosby; James E Mitchell; Scott G Engel; Stephen A Wonderlich; Heather K Simonich; Caroline B Peterson; Scott J Crow; Daniel Le Grange Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 4.861