OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the type and frequency of restrictive eating behaviors across the two subtypes of anorexia nervosa (AN; restricting [ANr] and binge eating/purging [ANbp]) using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and to determine whether subtype differences in restrictive eating behaviors were attributable to severity of the disorder or the frequency of binge eating. METHOD: Participants (N = 118) were women at least 18 years of age with full (n = 59) or subthreshold (n = 59) AN who participated in a two week (EMA) protocol. RESULTS: General estimating equations revealed that individuals with ANbp generally reported more frequent restrictive eating behaviors than individuals with ANr. These differences were mostly accounted for by greater severity of eating psychopathology, indicating that the presence and frequency of restrictive eating behaviors in AN may be nonweight-based markers of severity. Binge eating frequency did not account for these findings. DISCUSSION: The present findings are especially interesting in light of the weight-based severity rating in the DSM-5.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the type and frequency of restrictive eating behaviors across the two subtypes of anorexia nervosa (AN; restricting [ANr] and binge eating/purging [ANbp]) using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and to determine whether subtype differences in restrictive eating behaviors were attributable to severity of the disorder or the frequency of binge eating. METHOD:Participants (N = 118) were women at least 18 years of age with full (n = 59) or subthreshold (n = 59) AN who participated in a two week (EMA) protocol. RESULTS: General estimating equations revealed that individuals with ANbp generally reported more frequent restrictive eating behaviors than individuals with ANr. These differences were mostly accounted for by greater severity of eating psychopathology, indicating that the presence and frequency of restrictive eating behaviors in AN may be nonweight-based markers of severity. Binge eating frequency did not account for these findings. DISCUSSION: The present findings are especially interesting in light of the weight-based severity rating in the DSM-5.
Authors: Kamryn T Eddy; Pamela K Keel; David J Dorer; Sherrie S Delinsky; Debra L Franko; David B Herzog Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Scott G Engel; Ross D Crosby; Graham Thomas; Dale Bond; Jason M Lavender; Tyler Mason; Kristine J Steffen; Dan D Green; Stephen A Wonderlich Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Kyle P De Young; Jason M Lavender; Ross D Crosby; Stephen A Wonderlich; Scott G Engel; James E Mitchell; Scott J Crow; Carol B Peterson; Daniel Le Grange Journal: Appetite Date: 2014-08-15 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Shirley B Wang; Christopher J Mancuso; Jenny Jo; Ani C Keshishian; Kendra R Becker; Franziska Plessow; Alyssa M Izquierdo; Meghan Slattery; Debra L Franko; Madhusmita Misra; Elizabeth A Lawson; Jennifer J Thomas; Kamryn T Eddy Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2019-12-30 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Shirley B Wang; Emily M Pisetsky; Julie M Skutch; Alan E Fruzzetti; Ann F Haynos Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 2018-02-11 Impact factor: 3.735
Authors: Emily K White; Cortney S Warren; Li Cao; Ross D Crosby; Scott G Engel; Stephen A Wonderlich; James E Mitchell; Carol B Peterson; Scott J Crow; Daniel Le Grange Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Susan K Raatz; Lisa Jahns; LuAnn K Johnson; Ross Crosby; James E Mitchell; Scott Crow; Carol Peterson; Daniel Le Grange; Stephen A Wonderlich Journal: Nutrients Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Sarah Maguire; Lois J Surgenor; Daniel Le Grange; Hubert Lacey; Ross D Crosby; Scott G Engel; Kirsty M Fromholtz; Bryony Bamford; Stephen Touyz Journal: J Eat Disord Date: 2017-11-27