BACKGROUND: The intraindividual variability of C-reactive protein (CRP) remains uncertain. Although guidelines suggest stability of serial CRP values comparable to that of cholesterol measures, several studies indicate greater fluctuations of CRP. We sought to compare the intraindividual variability of CRP with that of cholesterol measures using the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). METHODS: CRP measurements were available in 760 MESA participants after exclusion of those with comorbidities or medications known to affect CRP or CRP≥10 mg/L. Serial values were available for 255 participants. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was quantified for CRP, total cholesterol (TC), and non-HDL-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) as the ratio of between-subject variance to the sum of between-subject and within-subject variance. Fluctuation between baseline and follow-up categories was calculated by cross-classifying participants according to baseline tertiles. RESULTS: The multivariable-adjusted ICC of CRP was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.55-0.68), significantly lower than that of TC (0.75; 95% CI, 0.70-0.81; p = 0.001 vs CRP) and non-HDL-C (0.76; 95% CI, 0.71-0.81; p = 0.001 vs CRP). 51% of participants in the highest baseline CRP tertile had discordant values on follow-up, while 54% and 27% were discordant in the middle and lowest baseline CRP tertiles. Among participants with baseline CRP levels exceeding 3 mg/L, a clinical threshold for higher risk, 69% had subsequent measurements falling within a lower risk category. CONCLUSIONS: In the MESA cohort, intraindividual variation of CRP was significantly greater than that for cholesterol measures. Our results suggest that further evaluation of CRP variability is needed in large prospective studies using shorter intervals between measurements.
BACKGROUND: The intraindividual variability of C-reactive protein (CRP) remains uncertain. Although guidelines suggest stability of serial CRP values comparable to that of cholesterol measures, several studies indicate greater fluctuations of CRP. We sought to compare the intraindividual variability of CRP with that of cholesterol measures using the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). METHODS:CRP measurements were available in 760 MESAparticipants after exclusion of those with comorbidities or medications known to affect CRP or CRP≥10 mg/L. Serial values were available for 255 participants. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was quantified for CRP, total cholesterol (TC), and non-HDL-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) as the ratio of between-subject variance to the sum of between-subject and within-subject variance. Fluctuation between baseline and follow-up categories was calculated by cross-classifying participants according to baseline tertiles. RESULTS: The multivariable-adjusted ICC of CRP was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.55-0.68), significantly lower than that of TC (0.75; 95% CI, 0.70-0.81; p = 0.001 vs CRP) and non-HDL-C (0.76; 95% CI, 0.71-0.81; p = 0.001 vs CRP). 51% of participants in the highest baseline CRP tertile had discordant values on follow-up, while 54% and 27% were discordant in the middle and lowest baseline CRP tertiles. Among participants with baseline CRP levels exceeding 3 mg/L, a clinical threshold for higher risk, 69% had subsequent measurements falling within a lower risk category. CONCLUSIONS: In the MESA cohort, intraindividual variation of CRP was significantly greater than that for cholesterol measures. Our results suggest that further evaluation of CRP variability is needed in large prospective studies using shorter intervals between measurements.
Authors: Thomas A Pearson; George A Mensah; R Wayne Alexander; Jeffrey L Anderson; Richard O Cannon; Michael Criqui; Yazid Y Fadl; Stephen P Fortmann; Yuling Hong; Gary L Myers; Nader Rifai; Sidney C Smith; Kathryn Taubert; Russell P Tracy; Frank Vinicor Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-01-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Wolfgang Koenig; Malte Sund; Margit Fröhlich; Hannelore Löwel; Winston L Hutchinson; Mark B Pepys Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2003-08-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Richard C Pasternak; Jonathan Abrams; Philip Greenland; Lynn A Smaha; Peter W F Wilson; Nancy Houston-Miller Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-06-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Andrea L Metti; Howard Aizenstein; Kristine Yaffe; Robert M Boudreau; Anne Newman; Lenore Launer; Peter J Gianaros; Oscar L Lopez; Judith Saxton; Diane G Ives; Stephen Kritchevsky; Abbe N Vallejo; Caterina Rosano Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Keenan A Walker; B Gwen Windham; Charles H Brown; David S Knopman; Clifford R Jack; Thomas H Mosley; Elizabeth Selvin; Dean F Wong; Timothy M Hughes; Yun Zhou; Alden L Gross; Rebecca F Gottesman Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Matthew Schenk; Fabian Eichelmann; Matthias B Schulze; Natalia Rudovich; Andreas F Pfeiffer; Romina di Giuseppe; Heiner Boeing; Krasimira Aleksandrova Journal: Biomark Med Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 2.851
Authors: Christina M Parrinello; Pamela L Lutsey; Christie M Ballantyne; Aaron R Folsom; James S Pankow; Elizabeth Selvin Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2015-04-18 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Mahmoud Al Rifai; Michael G Silverman; Khurram Nasir; Matthew J Budoff; Ron Blankstein; Moyses Szklo; Ronit Katz; Roger S Blumenthal; Michael J Blaha Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2015-02-07 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Tracey G Simon; Maria Esther Perez Trejo; Robyn McClelland; Ryan Bradley; Michael J Blaha; Irfan Zeb; Kathleen E Corey; Matthew J Budoff; Raymond T Chung Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Leah H Rubin; Lorie Benning; Sheila M Keating; Philip J Norris; Jane Burke-Miller; Antonia Savarese; Krithika N Kumanan; Saria Awadalla; Gayle Springer; Kathyrn Anastos; Mary Young; Joel Milam; Victor G Valcour; Kathleen M Weber; Pauline M Maki Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 2.643
Authors: Andrea L Metti; Kristine Yaffe; Robert M Boudreau; Eleanor M Simonsick; Ryan M Carnahan; Suzanne Satterfield; Tamara B Harris; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Caterina Rosano; Jane A Cauley Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2014-06-06 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Emil M Degoma; Mat D Davis; Richard L Dunbar; Emile R Mohler; Philip Greenland; Benjamin French Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 5.162