Federica Braga1, Mauro Panteghini. 1. Centro Interdipartimentale per la Riferibilità Metrologica in Medicina di Laboratorio (CIRME), Università degli Studi, Milano, Italy. federica.braga@unimi.it
Abstract
BACKGROUND: C-reactive protein (CRP) is recognized as a marker of cardiovascular risk. The biologic variability of CRP is crucial to understanding its significance in estimation of individual risk and subsequent changes in serial analyses. METHODS: We systematically reviewed publications on biologic variation of CRP to evaluate the consistency of available data. Data was evaluated with attention to number and type of enrolled subjects, duration of study, frequency of sample collection, sample type, sample storage, analytical methodology, assay sensitivity and statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of eleven studies on CRP biologic variability were recruited from literature. The majority of studies were limited by choice of analytic methodology, population selection, protocol application, and statistical analysis. Unfortunately, the only study that fulfilled all major pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical requirements derived biologic variability from logarithmically transformed data, thus making application to clinical practice difficult. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of robust data on biologic CRP variability in serum. It is obvious that additional well defined studies are needed to define reliable values of reference change values and of number of samples required to estimate the individual's cardiovascular risk by CRP.
BACKGROUND:C-reactive protein (CRP) is recognized as a marker of cardiovascular risk. The biologic variability of CRP is crucial to understanding its significance in estimation of individual risk and subsequent changes in serial analyses. METHODS: We systematically reviewed publications on biologic variation of CRP to evaluate the consistency of available data. Data was evaluated with attention to number and type of enrolled subjects, duration of study, frequency of sample collection, sample type, sample storage, analytical methodology, assay sensitivity and statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of eleven studies on CRP biologic variability were recruited from literature. The majority of studies were limited by choice of analytic methodology, population selection, protocol application, and statistical analysis. Unfortunately, the only study that fulfilled all major pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical requirements derived biologic variability from logarithmically transformed data, thus making application to clinical practice difficult. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of robust data on biologic CRP variability in serum. It is obvious that additional well defined studies are needed to define reliable values of reference change values and of number of samples required to estimate the individual's cardiovascular risk by CRP.
Authors: Emil M DeGoma; Benjamin French; Richard L Dunbar; Matthew A Allison; Emile R Mohler; Matthew J Budoff Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Aírton J Rombaldi; Lúcia C Pellanda; Renata M Bielemann; Denise P Gigante; Pedro C Hallal; Bernardo L Horta Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Leon F A van Dullemen; Marie-Laëtitia Thézénas; Rutger J Ploeg; Benedikt M Kessler; Maria Kaisar; M Zeeshan Akhtar; Honglei Huang; Sandrine Rendel; Philip D Charles; Roman Fischer Journal: Clin Proteomics Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 3.988
Authors: Lara M C Puhlmann; Veronika Engert; Filia Apostolakou; Ioannis Papassotiriou; George P Chrousos; Pascal Vrtička; Tania Singer Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-18 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Lou-Ann C Andersen; Nicolai Bjødstrup Palstrøm; Axel Diederichsen; Jes Sanddal Lindholt; Lars Melholt Rasmussen; Hans Christian Beck Journal: Proteomes Date: 2021-12-01