Literature DB >> 22846249

Assessing the protective value of protective behavioral strategies.

Christine Frank1, Jennifer Thake, Christopher G Davis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many students report using strategies believed to reduce risk of harm from consumption of alcohol. The effectiveness of these strategies was tested in this study.
METHOD: A sample of 442 undergraduate students (50.5% female) was asked to report how many alcoholic drinks they consumed on a recent drinking occasion, which protective strategies were used, and which harms were experienced.
RESULTS: Although reported use of more protective strategies was associated with less consumption, it appeared to be unrelated to harmful consequences. More detailed analyses suggested that only a small subset of strategies (primarily those concerning the manner of drinking) was consistently associated with reduced consumption and/or harms.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings cast doubt on the efficacy of protective strategies or at least the validity of the self-report instruments used to assess these strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22846249     DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs        ISSN: 1937-1888            Impact factor:   2.582


  13 in total

1.  The efficacy of a standalone protective behavioral strategies intervention for students accessing mental health services.

Authors:  Joseph W LaBrie; Lucy E Napper; Elizabeth M Grimaldi; Shannon R Kenney; Andrew Lac
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2015-07

2.  Testing a model of caffeinated alcohol-specific expectancies.

Authors:  Ashley N Linden-Carmichael; Cathy Lau-Barraco; Amy L Stamates
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  'Mama Don't Preach': Young Adults' Perceptions of Maternal Messages about Underage Drinking.

Authors:  Lucy E Napper; Laura C Wolter; Diana S Ebersole
Journal:  J Fam Commun       Date:  2020-02-06

Review 4.  Interventions to reduce college student drinking: State of the evidence for mechanisms of behavior change.

Authors:  Allecia E Reid; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-06-24

5.  Are protective behavioral strategies associated with fewer negative consequences on high-intensity drinking days? Results from a measurement-burst design.

Authors:  Ashley N Linden-Carmichael; Brian H Calhoun; Megan E Patrick; Jennifer L Maggs
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2018-10-25

6.  Endorsement of the "firewater myth" affects the use of protective behavioral strategies among American Indian and Alaska Native students.

Authors:  Vivian M Gonzalez; Adrian J Bravo; Maria C Crouch
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Perceived vulnerability moderates the relations between the use of protective behavioral strategies and alcohol use and consequences among high-risk young adults.

Authors:  Tracey A Garcia; Anne M Fairlie; Dana M Litt; Katja A Waldron; Melissa A Lewis
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 8.  Use of alcohol protective behavioral strategies among college students: a critical review.

Authors:  Matthew R Pearson
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-08-23

9.  Social anxiety and drinking refusal self-efficacy moderate the relationship between drinking game participation and alcohol-related consequences.

Authors:  Shannon R Kenney; Lucy E Napper; Joseph W LaBrie
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.829

10.  A cross-lagged panel model examining protective behavioral strategies: are types of strategies differentially related to alcohol use and consequences?

Authors:  Lucy E Napper; Shannon R Kenney; Andrew Lac; Leslie J Lewis; Joseph W LaBrie
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.