Literature DB >> 22844988

Solvent-extractable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biochar: influence of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock.

Marco Keiluweit1, Markus Kleber, Margaret A Sparrow, Bernd R T Simoneit, Fredrick G Prahl.   

Abstract

Despite the increasing agricultural use of biochar as a way of combining the utilization of biomass for energy production with the removal of CO(2) from the atmosphere, it is not known how variations in pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type affect concentration and composition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) that inevitably form and associate with biochar. To close this knowledge gap, we quantified 11 unsubstituted three- to five-ring PAHs as well as alkylated forms of phenanthrene and anthracene in grass and wood chars produced in 100 °C increments across a temperature range (100 to 700 °C). Our results show that solvent-extractable PAH concentrations in biochars produced at heat treatment temperatures (HTTs) of 400 and 500 °C greatly exceed those observed at higher and lower temperature, supporting a low HTT solid-phase formation mechanism operable at temperatures commonly used for industrial biochar production. The maximum extractable yield of 'pyrolytic' unsubstituted PAHs for grass (22 μg g(-1) at HTT = 500 °C) greatly exceeds the value for wood (5.9 μg g(-1)). Moreover, PAH signatures (e.g., total monomethylphenanthrene to phenanthrene ratios, MP/P ~2-3) at intermediate temperatures (400 °C) resemble those of fossil oils rather than that commonly attributed to pyrolytic products. Further research is needed to characterize the PAH evolution in modern pyrolysis reactors and assess the fate of biochar-bound PAHs in soils and sediments. Various commonly applied PAH ratios and indicator compounds show promise as markers for specific feedstock materials and pyrolysis conditions of biochars in environmental systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22844988     DOI: 10.1021/es302125k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  19 in total

Review 1.  Biochar efficiency in pesticides sorption as a function of production variables--a review.

Authors:  Saba Yavari; Amirhossein Malakahmad; Nasiman B Sapari
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Characterization of contaminants and evaluation of the suitability for land application of maize and sludge biochars.

Authors:  Fei Luo; Jing Song; Weixia Xia; Mingang Dong; Mengfang Chen; Petr Soudek
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Rice husks and their hydrochars cause unexpected stress response in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: reduced transcription of stress-related genes.

Authors:  Shumon Chakrabarti; Christiane Dicke; Dimitrios Kalderis; Jürgen Kern
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Influence of Al-oxide on pesticide sorption to woody biochars with different surface areas.

Authors:  Jianxin Shou; Huaping Dong; Jianfa Li; Jiaxing Zhong; Saijun Li; Jinhong Lü; Yimin Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Levels of persistent toxic substances in different biochars and their potential ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Guixiang Zhang; Zhihua Zhao; Xiaofang Guo; Zhiwang Han; Qiusheng He; Fengsong Zhang; Hongying Xu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Safety assessment of gasification biochars using Folsomia candida (Collembola) ecotoxicological bioassays.

Authors:  Federica D Conti; Giovanna Visioli; Alessio Malcevschi; Cristina Menta
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  The influence of sunlight and oxidative treatment on measured PAH concentrations in biochar.

Authors:  Fathima N M Khalid; Doug Klarup
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Carbon sequestration potential and physicochemical properties differ between wildfire charcoals and slow-pyrolysis biochars.

Authors:  Cristina Santín; Stefan H Doerr; Agustin Merino; Thomas D Bucheli; Rob Bryant; Philippa Ascough; Xiaodong Gao; Caroline A Masiello
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Feasibility of biochar application on a landfill final cover-a review on balancing ecology and shallow slope stability.

Authors:  Xun-Wen Chen; James Tsz-Fung Wong; Charles Wang-Wai Ng; Ming-Hung Wong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 10.  Insight into Multiple and Multilevel Structures of Biochars and Their Potential Environmental Applications: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Xin Xiao; Baoliang Chen; Zaiming Chen; Lizhong Zhu; Jerald L Schnoor
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.