Literature DB >> 22844163

Two ways to listen: Do L2-dominant bilinguals perceive stop voicing according to language mode?

Mark Antoniou1, Michael D Tyler, Catherine T Best.   

Abstract

How listeners categorize two phones predicts the success with which they will discriminate the given phonetic distinction. In the case of bilinguals, such perceptual patterns could reveal whether the listener's two phonological systems are integrated or separate. This is of particular interest when a given contrast is realized differently in each language, as is the case with Greek and English stop-voicing distinctions. We had Greek-English early sequential bilinguals and Greek and English monolinguals (baselines) categorize, rate, and discriminate stop-voicing contrasts in each language. All communication with each group of bilinguals occurred solely in one language mode, Greek or English. The monolingual groups showed the expected native-language constraints, each perceiving their native contrast more accurately than the opposing nonnative contrast. Bilinguals' category-goodness ratings for the same physical stimuli differed, consistent with their language mode, yet their discrimination performance was unaffected by language mode and biased toward their dominant language (English). We conclude that bilinguals integrate both languages in a common phonetic space that is swayed by their long-term dominant language environment for discrimination, but that they selectively attend to language-specific phonetic information for phonologically motivated judgments (category-goodness ratings).

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22844163      PMCID: PMC3403831          DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phon        ISSN: 0095-4470


  15 in total

1.  The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: exemplar-Based versus abstract lexical entries.

Authors:  C Pallier; A Colomé; N Sebastián-Gallés
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

2.  Online processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals.

Authors:  N Sebastián-Gallés; S Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-09-30

3.  Perceptual learning in speech.

Authors:  Dennis Norris; James M McQueen; Anne Cutler
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence.

Authors:  D H Klatt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Base-language effects on word identification in bilingual speech: evidence from categorical perception experiments.

Authors:  J Bürki-Cohen; F Grosjean; J L Miller
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1989 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.500

6.  Consonant and vowel perception and production: early English-French bilinguals and English monolinguals.

Authors:  M Mack
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-08

7.  An acoustic study of the effects of tempo and stress on segmental intervals in Modern Greek.

Authors:  M Fourakis
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.759

8.  Language context elicits native-like stop voicing in early bilinguals' productions in both L1 and L2.

Authors:  Mark Antoniou; Catherine T Best; Michael D Tyler; Christian Kroos
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2010-10

9.  Perceptual assimilation and discrimination of non-native vowel contrasts.

Authors:  Michael D Tyler; Catherine T Best; Alice Faber; Andrea G Levitt
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.759

10.  Testing the double phonemic boundary in bilinguals.

Authors:  Adrian Garcia-Sierra; Randy L Diehl; Craig Champlin
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.017

View more
  10 in total

1.  Varying irrelevant phonetic features hinders learning of the feature being trained.

Authors:  Mark Antoniou; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  An analysis of the perception of stop consonants in bilinguals and monolinguals in different phonetic contexts: A range-based language cueing approach.

Authors:  Adrián García-Sierra; Elizabeth Schifano; Gianna M Duncan; Melanie S Fish
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Focusing the lens of language experience: perception of Ma'di stops by Greek and English bilinguals and monolinguals.

Authors:  Mark Antoniou; Catherine T Best; Michael D Tyler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparing non-native and native speech: Are L2 productions more variable?

Authors:  Xin Xie; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perceptual assimilation and discrimination of non-native vowel contrasts.

Authors:  Michael D Tyler; Catherine T Best; Alice Faber; Andrea G Levitt
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.759

6.  Sleep and native language interference affect non-native speech sound learning.

Authors:  F Sayako Earle; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The role of abstraction in non-native speech perception.

Authors:  Bozena Pajak; Roger Levy
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2014-09-01

8.  ERP Response Unveils Effect of Second Language Manipulation on First Language Processing.

Authors:  Elvira Khachatryan; Flavio Camarrone; Wim Fias; Marc M Van Hulle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Plasticity, Variability and Age in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism.

Authors:  David Birdsong
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-12

10.  The effect of simultaneous exposure on the attention selection and integration of segments and lexical tones by Urdu-Cantonese bilingual speakers.

Authors:  Jinghong Ning; Gang Peng; Yi Liu; Yingnan Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.