Literature DB >> 22843769

Small hepatocellular carcinomas: improved sensitivity by combining gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging patterns.

Min Jung Park1, Young Kon Kim, Min Woo Lee, Won Jae Lee, Young-Sun Kim, Seong Hyun Kim, Dongil Choi, Hyunchul Rhim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if the combination of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging helps to increase accuracy and sensitivity in the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) compared with those achieved by using each MR imaging technique alone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed consent. The study included 130 patients (95 men, 35 women) with 179 surgically confirmed small HCCs (≤2.0 cm) and 130 patients with cirrhosis (90 men, 40 women) without HCC who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and DW imaging at 3.0 T between May 2009 and July 2010. Three sets of images were analyzed independently by three observers to detect HCC: a gadoxetic acid set (unenhanced, early dynamic, and hepatobiliary phases), a DW imaging set, and a combined set. Data were analyzed by using alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Diagnostic accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [A(z)]), sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were calculated.
RESULTS: The mean A(z) values for the combined set (0.952) were significantly higher than those for the gadoxetic acid set (A(z) = 0.902) or the DW imaging set alone (A(z) = 0.871) (P ≤ .008). On a per-lesion basis, observers showed higher sensitivity in their analyses of the combined set (range, 91.1%-93.3% [163-167 of 179]) than in those of the gadoxetic acid set (range, 80.5%-82.1% [144-147 of 179]) or the DW imaging set alone (range, 77.7%-79.9% [139-143 of 179]) (P ≤ .003). Positive predictive values and specificity for all observers were equivalent for the three imaging sets.
CONCLUSION: The combination of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and DW imaging yielded better diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity in the detection of small HCCs than each MR imaging technique alone. © RSNA, 2012

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22843769     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  58 in total

1.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Preoperative Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced 3-T MR Imaging for Malignant Liver Lesions by Using Ex Vivo MR Imaging-matched Pathologic Findings as the Reference Standard.

Authors:  Eduardo A C Costa; Guilherme M Cunha; Emmanuil Smorodinsky; Irene Cruite; An Tang; Robert M Marks; Lisa Clark; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony Gamst; Jason K Sicklick; Alan Hemming; Michael R Peterson; Michael S Middleton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepato-biliary phase MR imaging: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paola Erra; Marta Puglia; Alfonso Ragozzino; Simone Maurea; Raffaele Liuzzi; Giuseppe Sabino; Luigi Barbuto; Alberto Cuocolo; Massimo Imbriaco
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update.

Authors:  Masao Omata; Ann-Lii Cheng; Norihiro Kokudo; Masatoshi Kudo; Jeong Min Lee; Jidong Jia; Ryosuke Tateishi; Kwang-Hyub Han; Yoghesh K Chawla; Shuichiro Shiina; Wasim Jafri; Diana Alcantara Payawal; Takamasa Ohki; Sadahisa Ogasawara; Pei-Jer Chen; Cosmas Rinaldi A Lesmana; Laurentius A Lesmana; Rino A Gani; Shuntaro Obi; A Kadir Dokmeci; Shiv Kumar Sarin
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 4.  [CT and MRI of the liver: when, what, why?]

Authors:  J Budjan; S O Schoenberg; U I Attenberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  An Investigation of Transient Severe Motion Related to Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging.

Authors:  Utaroh Motosugi; Peter Bannas; Candice A Bookwalter; Katsuhiro Sano; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Guide for diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Magdy Hamed Attwa; Shahira Aly El-Etreby
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-06-28

7.  Respiratory Motion-Resolved Compressed Sensing Reconstruction of Free-Breathing Radial Acquisition for Dynamic Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Hersh Chandarana; Li Feng; Justin Ream; Annie Wang; James S Babb; Kai Tobias Block; Daniel K Sodickson; Ricardo Otazo
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Normal hepatic parenchyma visibility and ADC quantification on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 T: influence of age, gender, and iron content.

Authors:  Thierry Metens; Kellen Fanstone Ferraresi; Alessandra Farchione; Christophe Moreno; Maria Antonietta Bali; Celso Matos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI as a predictor of recurrence of HCC after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Sunyoung Lee; Kyoung Won Kim; Woo Kyoung Jeong; Myeong-Jin Kim; Gi Hong Choi; Jin Sub Choi; Gi-Won Song; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: techniques and applications.

Authors:  Sara Lewis; Hadrien Dyvorne; Yong Cui; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.