Literature DB >> 22842678

Monte Carlo modelling of diode detectors for small field MV photon dosimetry: detector model simplification and the sensitivity of correction factors to source parameterization.

G Cranmer-Sargison1, S Weston, J A Evans, N P Sidhu, D I Thwaites.   

Abstract

The goal of this work was to examine the use of simplified diode detector models within a recently proposed Monte Carlo (MC) based small field dosimetry formalism and to investigate the influence of electron source parameterization has on MC calculated correction factors. BEAMnrc was used to model Varian 6 MV jaw-collimated square field sizes down to 0.5 cm. The IBA stereotactic field diode (SFD), PTW T60016 (shielded) and PTW T60017 (un-shielded) diodes were modelled in DOSRZnrc and isocentric output ratios (OR(fclin)(detMC)) calculated at depths of d = 1.5, 5.0 and 10.0 cm. Simplified detector models were then tested by evaluating the percent difference in (OR(fclin)(detMC)) between the simplified and complete detector models. The influence of active volume dimension on simulated output ratio and response factor was also investigated. The sensitivity of each MC calculated replacement correction factor (k(fclin,fmsr)(Qclin,Qmsr)), as a function of electron FWHM between 0.100 and 0.150 cm and energy between 5.5 and 6.5 MeV, was investigated for the same set of small field sizes using the simplified detector models. The SFD diode can be approximated simply as a silicon chip in water, the T60016 shielded diode can be modelled as a chip in water plus the entire shielding geometry and the T60017 unshielded diode as a chip in water plus the filter plate located upstream. The detector-specific (k(fclin,fmsr)(Qclin,Qmsr)), required to correct measured output ratios using the SFD, T60016 and T60017 diode detectors are insensitive to incident electron energy between 5.5 and 6.5 MeV and spot size variation between FWHM = 0.100 and 0.150 cm. Three general conclusions come out of this work: (1) detector models can be simplified to produce OR(fclin)(detMC) to within 1.0% of those calculated using the complete geometry, where typically not only the silicon chip, but also any high density components close to the chip, such as scattering plates or shielding material is necessary to be included in the model, (2) diode detectors of smaller active radius require less of a correction and (3) (k(fclin,fmsr)(Qclin,Qmsr)) is insensitive to the incident the electron energy and spot size variations investigated. Therefore, simplified detector models can be used with acceptable accuracy within the recently proposed small field dosimetry formalism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22842678     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/16/5141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Output factor determination based on Monte Carlo simulation for small cone field in 10-MV photon beam.

Authors:  Kyohei Fukata; Satoru Sugimoto; Chie Kurokawa; Akito Saito; Tatsuya Inoue; Keisuke Sasai
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-04-04

2.  Measurement of percentage dose at the surface for a 6 MV photon beam.

Authors:  O O Galván De la Cruz; M A Rodríguez-Ávila; T Rivera-Montalvo; O A García Garduño
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-10-18

3.  Survey of 5 mm small-field output factor measurements in Australia.

Authors:  Christopher P Oliver; Duncan J Butler; Viliami Takau; Ivan Williams
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Small field detector correction factors: effects of the flattening filter for Elekta and Varian linear accelerators.

Authors:  Madelaine K Tyler; Paul Z Y Liu; Christopher Lee; David R McKenzie; Natalka Suchowerska
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Output factor comparison of Monte Carlo and measurement for Varian TrueBeam 6 MV and 10 MV flattening filter-free stereotactic radiosurgery system.

Authors:  Jason Y Cheng; Holly Ning; Barbara C Arora; Ying Zhuge; Robert W Miller
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Reconstruction of the electron source intensity distribution of a clinical linear accelerator using in-air measurements and a genetic algorithm.

Authors:  Egor Borzov; Alexander Nevelsky; Raquel Bar-Deroma; Itzhak Orion
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-09

7.  Detector-specific correction factors in radiosurgery beams and their impact on dose distribution calculations.

Authors:  Olivia A García-Garduño; Manuel A Rodríguez-Ávila; José M Lárraga-Gutiérrez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.