Literature DB >> 22841876

Clinical and procedural outcome of patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead: early results of a prospective multicenter study.

Giovanni B Forleo1, Massimo Mantica, Luigi Di Biase, Germana Panattoni, Domenico G Della Rocca, Lida P Papavasileiou, Matteo Santamaria, Pasquale Santangeli, Andrea Avella, Domenico Sergi, Luca Santini, Claudio Tondo, Andrea Natale, Francesco Romeo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with a quadripolar left ventricular (LV) lead results in low rates of dislocation and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) acutely and at short-term follow-up. Confirmation of these results by long-term observational studies is needed.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term procedural and clinical outcomes of CRT patients implanted with a quadripolar LV lead.
METHODS: A total of 154 consecutive heart failure patients (79% men, age 68 ± 10 years) having CRT implantation attempts with a quadripolar LV lead were included in this observational registry. Demographic and clinical data were preoperatively collected, and patients were followed up for at least 6 months.
RESULTS: The overall implant success rate after coronary sinus cannulation was 97.4%. Mean overall duration and fluoroscopy time of successful procedures was 112 ± 22 and 16 ± 8 minutes, respectively, while 17 ± 13 minutes were necessary for the LV lead placement. After implant, the conventional bipolar configuration was used as the final pacing configuration in 33.3% of the patients. Four lead dislodgments (requiring reoperation) and 9 clinical PNS were reported during follow-up; reprogramming of the device was sufficient to prevent PNS in all patients. Once placed, the LV lead remained stable with excellent pacing thresholds during follow-up (15 ± 5 months). Overall, there were 71.3% CRT responders as assessed by 6-month echocardiography, and 66% improved at least 1 New York Heart Association class.
CONCLUSION: Over the longer term, CRT with the quadripolar LV lead is associated with excellent pacing thresholds, low rates of dislocations, and PNS.
Copyright © 2012 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22841876     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  19 in total

Review 1.  Updates in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Chronic Heart Failure: Review of Multisite Pacing.

Authors:  Antonios P Antoniadis; Ben Sieniewicz; Justin Gould; Bradley Porter; Jessica Webb; Simon Claridge; Jonathan M Behar; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-10

Review 2.  Targeting left ventricular lead placement to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey Liu; Evan Adelstein; Samir Saba
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Improved implant and postoperative lead performance in CRT-D patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. A 6-month follow-up analysis from a multicenter prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Giovanni B Forleo; Luigi Di Biase; Germana Panattoni; Massimo Mantica; Quintino Parisi; Annamaria Martino; Augusto Pappalardo; Domenico Sergi; Manfredi Tesauro; Lida P Papavasileiou; Luca Santini; Leonardo Calò; Claudio Tondo; Andrea Natale; Francesco Romeo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  A Meta-Analysis Of Quadripolar Versus Bipolar Left Ventricular Leads On Post-Procedural Outcomes.

Authors:  Mohit K Turagam; Muhammad R Afzal; Sandia Iskander; Luigi Di Biase; Andrea Natale; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-08-31

Review 5.  Are electronic cardiac devices still evolving?

Authors:  G Carrault; P Mabo
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

Review 6.  Phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Ghassan Moubarak; Abdeslam Bouzeman; Jacky Ollitrault; Frederic Anselme; Serge Cazeau
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Multisite Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Promise and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Antonios P Antoniadis; Jonathan M Behar; Simon Claridge; Tom Jackson; Manav Sohal; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Optimizing CRT - Do We Need More Leads and Delivery Methods.

Authors:  Pieter Martens; Frederik Hendrik Verbrugge; Wilfried Mullens
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30

Review 9.  Exploring the Potential Role of Catheter Ablation in Patients with Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation: Should We Move away from Symptom Relief?

Authors:  Giovanni B Forleo; Luigi Di Biase; Domenico G Della Rocca; Gaetano Fassini; Luca Santini; Andrea Natale; Claudio Tondo
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-10-31

10.  Single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Antonello Vado; Endrj Menardi; Guido Rossetti; Gianpaolo Ballari; Mauro Feola; Marco Bobbio
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.