Literature DB >> 22837868

Critical care rehabilitation - is it the answer for reducing morbidity in ARDS survivors? Regarding "Acute respiratory distress syndrome: A clinical review".

Abraham Samuel Babu1, Lenny T Vasanthan.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22837868      PMCID: PMC3401882          DOI: 10.4103/2045-8932.97643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pulm Circ        ISSN: 2045-8932            Impact factor:   3.017


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, We read with interest the article by Michael Donahoe.[1] He wonderfully reviewed the various aspects of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and its management. ARDS poses an expensive burden on young patients who survived, not recovering completely with regard to physical function even after five years.[2] Intensive care unit (ICU) acquired weakness is an important contributor to long-term function and quality of life (QoL) in ARDS survivors.[3] Critical care rehabilitation has now become a key factor in the continued care of a patient in the ICU. Recent studies have shown that patients who have not received rehabilitation tend to have increased morbidity, with regard to poor QoL and functional impairment at the time of discharge.[4] Rehabilitation interventions begun in the ICU show improved functional outcomes at discharge from hospital. Early mobility in the ICU and critical care rehabilitation has been found to be feasible and safe.[5] Mobilization (namely limb exercises), respiratory and peripheral muscle training, and neuromuscular electrical stimulation are also utilized by physiotherapists in the ICU to help improve functional outcomes.[6] Rehabilitation algorithms are now available to serve as a guide in identifying suitable patients for mobilization and provide appropriate treatment strategies.[7] However, they may require adaptations and modifications to suit each individual patient. Therefore, this active form of rehabilitation, which is safe, should start within the ICU as soon as possible – even while patients are on mechanical ventilation in order to improve function and reduce morbidity, as 57% of patients who are ventilated for more than 48 hours, stand a greater chance for requiring assistance for upto one year.[8] More studies are required to assess how ARDS survivors respond to rehabilitation programs in the short term and long term.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Lung function and quality of life in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Authors:  M Elizabeth Wilcox; Margaret S Herridge
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 1.228

Review 2.  Physiotherapy in critically ill patients.

Authors:  N Ambrosino; N Janah; G Vagheggini
Journal:  Rev Port Pneumol       Date:  2011-07-22

3.  Disability among elderly survivors of mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Amber E Barnato; Steven M Albert; Derek C Angus; Judith R Lave; Howard B Degenholtz
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Early activity is feasible and safe in respiratory failure patients.

Authors:  Polly Bailey; George E Thomsen; Vicki J Spuhler; Robert Blair; James Jewkes; Louise Bezdjian; Kristy Veale; Larissa Rodriquez; Ramona O Hopkins
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  The development of a clinical management algorithm for early physical activity and mobilization of critically ill patients: synthesis of evidence and expert opinion and its translation into practice.

Authors:  Susan Hanekom; Rik Gosselink; Elizabeth Dean; Helena van Aswegen; Ronel Roos; Nicolino Ambrosino; Quinette Louw
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.477

6.  Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Margaret S Herridge; Catherine M Tansey; Andrea Matté; George Tomlinson; Natalia Diaz-Granados; Andrew Cooper; Cameron B Guest; C David Mazer; Sangeeta Mehta; Thomas E Stewart; Paul Kudlow; Deborah Cook; Arthur S Slutsky; Angela M Cheung
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Rehabilitation for hospital-associated deconditioning.

Authors:  Patrick Kortebein
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.159

8.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome: A clinical review.

Authors:  Michael Donahoe
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.017

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  COVID-19 and venous thromboembolism: current insights and prophylactic strategies.

Authors:  Pasquale Ambrosino; Alessandro Di Minno; Mauro Maniscalco; Matteo Nicola Dario Di Minno
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.709

Review 2.  COVID-19 and Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Literature Studies.

Authors:  Alessandro Di Minno; Pasquale Ambrosino; Ilenia Calcaterra; Matteo Nicola Dario Di Minno
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 4.180

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.