Literature DB >> 22837288

Reliable measurement by virtual touch tissue quantification with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: phantom study.

Noriko Yamanaka1, Chie Kaminuma, Ayako Taketomi-Takahashi, Yoshito Tsushima.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors that may affect shear wave velocity (SWV) measurements by using a phantom.
METHODS: The SWVs (meters per second) of 4 phantom targets and background, each of different hardness (Young modulus, 8-80 kPa), were measured in the virtual touch tissue quantification mode. Ten SWV measurements were performed on each target, and the mean SWV and its standard deviation were calculated. To assess the effect of the distance between the probe and region of interest (ROI) settings, mean SWV measurements of the background at 5 to 80 mm in depth were performed with a convex probe and at 5 to 40 mm with a high-frequency linear probe.
RESULTS: The linear correlation between the nominal Young modulus of the phantom and those calculated from the mean SWV was highly significant for the linear probe (y = 0.98x - 0.70; r(2) = 0.99; P = .0007). For the convex probe, the linear correlation between the nominal Young modulus of the phantom and those calculated from the mean SWV was highly significant between 8 and 40 kPa (y =1.26x + 1.01; r(2) = 0.98; P = .011). Measurement variations for the linear probe were little influenced by the distance between the probe and ROI, but those for the convex probe were dependent on the distance.
CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of the mean SWV measurement was dependent on the probe used and the distance between the probe and ROI settings. The linear probe provides accurate measurements throughout its range for all but its deepest limit. Measurements of 40 mm or deeper are better performed with a convex probe. Probe selection should be based on individual lesion depth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22837288     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.8.1239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of shear wave velocities on ultrasound elastography between different machines, transducers, and acquisition depths: a phantom study.

Authors:  Hyun Joo Shin; Myung-Joon Kim; Ha Yan Kim; Yun Ho Roh; Mi-Jung Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Assessment of ultrasound shear wave elastography within muscles using different region of interest sizes, manufacturers, probes and acquisition angles: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Xiuming Wang; Jiaan Zhu; Junxue Gao; Yue Hu; Yiqun Liu; Wenxue Li; Si Chen; Feifei Liu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-06

3.  Diagnostic value of strain elastography for differentiating benign and malignant soft tissue masses.

Authors:  Shilin Li; Lingfang Liu; Guorong Lv
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Preclinical evaluation of acoustic radiation force impulse measurements in regions of heterogeneous elasticity.

Authors:  Katharina Hollerieth; Bernhard Gaßmann; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Philipp Moog; Minh-Truc Vo-Cong; Uwe Heemann; Konrad Friedrich Stock
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2016-07-25

5.  Quality measurement on shear wave speed imaging: diagnostic value in differentiation of thyroid malignancy and the associated factors.

Authors:  Bo-Ji Liu; Chong-Ke Zhao; Hui-Xiong Xu; Yi-Feng Zhang; Jun-Mei Xu; Dan-Dan Li; Xiao-Wan Bo; Xiao-Long Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-17

6.  Measuring shear-wave speed with point shear-wave elastography and MR elastography: a phantom study.

Authors:  Riwa Kishimoto; Mikio Suga; Atsuhisa Koyama; Tokuhiko Omatsu; Yasuhiko Tachibana; Daniel K Ebner; Takayuki Obata
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Does standoff material affect acoustic radiation force impulse elastography? A preclinical study of a modified elastography phantom.

Authors:  Katharina Hollerieth; Bernhard Gaßmann; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Stephan Kemmner; Uwe Heemann; Konrad Friedrich Stock
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2017-07-28

8.  Reproducibility of shear wave elastography among operators, machines, and probes in an elasticity phantom.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Ibrahim Alrashed; Abdulrahman M Alfuraih
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2020-05-09

Review 9.  Evaluation of kidney allograft status using novel ultrasonic technologies.

Authors:  Cheng Yang; Mushuang Hu; Tongyu Zhu; Wanyuan He
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2015-07-06

10.  Value of shear wave arrival time contour display in shear wave elastography for breast masses diagnosis.

Authors:  Bang-Guo Zhou; Dan Wang; Wei-Wei Ren; Xiao-Long Li; Ya-Ping He; Bo-Ji Liu; Qiao Wang; Shi-Gao Chen; Azra Alizad; Hui-Xiong Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.